{"id":108,"date":"2003-10-27T16:19:38","date_gmt":"2003-10-27T20:19:38","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/lydondev\/2003\/10\/27\/blog-politics-stirling-newberry-the-"},"modified":"2012-05-04T00:06:23","modified_gmt":"2012-05-04T04:06:23","slug":"blog-politics-stirling-newberry-the-clark-campaign","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/lydondev\/2003\/10\/27\/blog-politics-stirling-newberry-the-clark-campaign\/","title":{"rendered":"Blog Politics: Stirling Newberry &amp; the Clark Campaign"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a name='a397'><\/a><\/p>\n<p><P><FONT face=\"Times New Roman,Times,Serif\" size=\"4\">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Stirling Newberry speaks <A href=\"http:\/\/media.skybuilders.com\/lydon\/Newberry.One.mp3\">here<\/A> about a telltale struggle with the Wesley Clark campaign which he helped create.&nbsp; He is the blogger who wrote earlier this month: &#8220;By the time you read these words the bell will be tolling for Wesley Clark&#8217;s candidacy.&#8221;&nbsp;&nbsp;<IMG hspace=\"10\" src=\"http:\/\/media.skybuilders.com\/Lydon\/images\/newberry.jpg\" align=\"right\" vspace=\"10\">And thus he crystallized&nbsp;a contest between people who drafted Clark and those who manage him; between analog and digital politics; between the Pyramid and the Sphere, as Newberry likes to illustrate it.&nbsp; It&#8217;s a contest that isn&#8217;t over between Internetizens and the Clinton alumni, between blog spirit and Democratic memory.&nbsp; Because Newberry remains a fierce Clark loyalist (to the candidacy if not the campaign) and because he is still blogging regularly to the <A href=\"http:\/\/www.theclarksphere.com\/\">Clarksphere<\/A>, the fight&nbsp;defines a nice puzzle&nbsp;about politics in the Internet era: can dissension actually promote a campaign when it&#8217;s an exercise of independent initiative on the wide-open Web?&nbsp; My guess is: yes.<\/FONT><\/P><br \/>\n<P><FONT face=\"Times New Roman\" size=\"4\">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <A href=\"http:\/\/www.theclarksphere.com\/\">Stirling Newberry<\/A>, I discover, is a musician as well as a programmer, a history buff as well as a politico.&nbsp; As persuasively as anybody I&#8217;ve met, he grasps and elaborates what feels so extraordinary about this moment, including: the Linux vs. Microsoft modeling of&nbsp;the new&nbsp;&#8220;open source&#8221; politics; the transition from campaign organization to electronic networking; the arrival of Internet time in politics; the convergence of &#8220;influentials&#8221; in the blogosphere; the link between rock &#8216;n&#8217; roll and blogging; the Iraq&nbsp;War trigger on the blog surge, and the <A href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/lydon\/2003\/06\/21\">Ralph Waldo Emerson<\/A> connection.&nbsp; This <A href=\"http:\/\/media.skybuilders.com\/lydon\/Newberry.One.mp3\">first half of a longer conversation<\/A> addresses Wesley Clark&#8217;s missed opportunity to develop his Net roots.&nbsp; Stirling Newberry would have urged Clark, for example, not to concede or abandon the Iowa caucuses but to turn them over to his bloggers, &#8220;make Iowa the test cast of the new politics,&#8221; an independent&nbsp;sort of seminar in self-organization on the Web.&nbsp; In the second half of the conversation, which I will post tomorrow, Newberry takes a crack at the new &#8220;master narrative&#8221; of American politics.&nbsp; Listen <A href=\"http:\/\/media.skybuilders.com\/lydon\/Newberry.One.mp3\">here<\/A>.<\/FONT><\/P><br \/>\n<P><FONT face=\"Times New Roman\" size=\"4\">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <\/FONT><\/P><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Stirling Newberry speaks here about a telltale struggle with the Wesley Clark campaign which he helped create.&nbsp; He is the blogger who wrote earlier this month: &#8220;By the time you read these words the bell will be tolling for Wesley Clark&#8217;s candidacy.&#8221;&nbsp;&nbsp;And thus he crystallized&nbsp;a contest between people who drafted Clark and those who [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1340,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-108","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/lydondev\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/108","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/lydondev\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/lydondev\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/lydondev\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1340"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/lydondev\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=108"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/lydondev\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/108\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":212,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/lydondev\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/108\/revisions\/212"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/lydondev\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=108"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/lydondev\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=108"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/lydondev\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=108"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}