{"id":390,"date":"2003-06-20T14:56:33","date_gmt":"2003-06-20T18:56:33","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/longestnow\/2003\/06\/20\/drafting-clark-for-prez\/"},"modified":"2003-06-20T14:56:33","modified_gmt":"2003-06-20T18:56:33","slug":"drafting-clark-for-prez","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/longestnow\/2003\/06\/20\/drafting-clark-for-prez\/","title":{"rendered":"Drafting Clark for Prez"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/a><\/p>\n

(10\/18<\/B>: There is now a separate Wesley Clark story<\/A> for future updates)
\n

  I’m not particularly curious about most of the presidential candidates<\/STRONG> out there.  Their motives are clear; their platforms and supporters and reasons for running, straightforward (and mostly uninteresting).  I respect Dean<\/A><\/STRONG>; it’s natural for him to have a groundswell of support considering his great success in an explosively grass-roots state and his supporters’ avid<\/A> blogging<\/A>; I want him to succeed.  But I’m not (yet) curious<\/STRONG> about him or his candidacy.  
      General Wesley Clark<\/STRONG><\/A> makes me very<\/EM> curious.<\/P>
\n

Current sites<\/FONT><\/P>
\n