{"id":533,"date":"2014-09-24T17:18:15","date_gmt":"2014-09-24T17:18:15","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/lamont\/?p=533"},"modified":"2020-06-20T18:38:19","modified_gmt":"2020-06-20T18:38:19","slug":"twitters-retention-problem","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/lamont\/2014\/09\/24\/twitters-retention-problem\/","title":{"rendered":"Solving the Twitter retention problem"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"Twitter<\/a>This week, I released the second edition of Twitter In 30 Minutes<\/em>. It\u2019s a Twitter book that covers the basics<\/a>, starting with registration and working its way up to more advanced features such as hashtags and lists. In this post, I would like to talk about a surprising research finding about Twitter retention data that I stumbled upon while preparing the latest edition.<\/p>\n

This Wall Street Journal<\/em> blog post from April<\/a> highlighted the Twitter retention data, which had been gathered by Dutch firm Twopcharts:<\/p>\n

A report from Twopcharts<\/a>, a website that monitors Twitter account activity, states that about 44% of the 974 million existing Twitter accounts have never sent a tweet.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

An earlier WSJ blog post based on Twopcharts data noted that only 11% of the Twitter accounts created in 2012 were still tweeting more than a year later. Twitter subsequently restricted Twopcharts\u2019 access to Twitter data, and a senior executive later claimed Twitter was \u201chappy\u201d many users decided not to tweet<\/a> \u2014 in other words, Twitter viewed some of this inactive population as passive consumers of Twitter, rather than active participants.<\/p>\n

Regardless of Twitter\u2019s spin, Twitter has had a problem for years getting people to participate in the service after they\u2019ve signed up. Despite adding tips and constant reminders to tweet and follow other accounts, lots of users have trouble figuring out what to do once they are plunked down in a firehose of short messages, random photos, trending topics, and mysterious Twitter syntax. As the WSJ blogger indicated, millions simply give up.<\/p>\n

Solving the Twitter retention problem, one reader at a time<\/h2>\n

Some of them ended up coming to my Twitter guide. While the first edition of Twitter In 30 Minutes<\/em> targeted totally new users, I found out that many of my readers already had accounts, and had trouble getting the hang of Twitter<\/a>. They used the guide to boost their efforts and figure out the more confusing elements of the service.<\/p>\n

For the second edition of Twitter In 30 Minutes<\/em>, I wanted to make sure that I served these two audiences (totally new users, vs. people who already have an account). I tightened the focus around these three elements:<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. The importance of a good network on Twitter.<\/li>\n
  2. How engagement takes place, using examples from real life.<\/li>\n
  3. Best practices for creating Tweets, posting photos, and participating in discussions<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    I also completely redid the screenshots. Many of the first edition screenshots were rendered obsolete after Twitter updated its interface earlier this year.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    This week, I released the second edition of Twitter In 30 Minutes. It\u2019s a Twitter book that covers the basics, starting with registration and working its way up to more advanced features such as hashtags and lists. In this post, I would like to talk about a surprising research finding about Twitter retention data that […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3864,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[57022],"tags":[99,3261,6208,85149],"class_list":["post-533","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-e-books","tag-business","tag-twitter","tag-ui","tag-ux"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/lamont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/533","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/lamont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/lamont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/lamont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3864"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/lamont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=533"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/lamont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/533\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1194,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/lamont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/533\/revisions\/1194"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/lamont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=533"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/lamont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=533"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/lamont\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=533"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}