{"id":1021,"date":"2010-09-03T14:26:01","date_gmt":"2010-09-03T18:26:01","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/kotrc\/?p=1021"},"modified":"2010-09-03T14:47:53","modified_gmt":"2010-09-03T18:47:53","slug":"cracking-the-3-timer-statistic","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/kotrc\/2010\/09\/03\/cracking-the-3-timer-statistic\/","title":{"rendered":"Cracking the 3-Timer Statistic"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Another spectacularly late start to the day. Whatever it is that&#8217;s making me this tired (the heat? visitor fatigue?), I hope I&#8217;m able to shake it this weekend. Although we do have more visitors coming. Ah well.<\/p>\n<p>At the end of the day, it&#8217;s productivity that counts, not hours, so time to shake the guilt over being late and time to get down to it. The next tractable task on my Gmail to-do list is plotting up the &#8216;three-timer&#8217; preservation statistic for diatoms. I had completed the code for this the last time I worked on it (whenever that was\u2014curiously, I don&#8217;t seem to have written about it on this blog), but couldn&#8217;t get it to work. So, debugging time it is.<\/p>\n<p>I got the code to work reasonably well\u2014I think!\u2014although the result was not at all what I expected. It looks like preservation, as reported by this measure of the occurrence data itself, is fairly constant over time. This is quite surprising, because there is a discrepancy between the sampled in-bin and the range-through diversity curves, and the discrepancy (a similar, though not identical, quantity to the three-timer statistic) varies over time.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center\"><a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/kotrc\/files\/2010\/09\/DiatomPreservation3T.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-medium wp-image-1026\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/kotrc\/files\/2010\/09\/DiatomPreservation3T-300x171.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"171\" srcset=\"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/kotrc\/files\/2010\/09\/DiatomPreservation3T-300x171.png 300w, https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/kotrc\/files\/2010\/09\/DiatomPreservation3T-1024x585.png 1024w, https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/kotrc\/files\/2010\/09\/DiatomPreservation3T.png 1050w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Here, for comparison, the preservation as recorded qualitatively in the Neptune database (as good [2], moderate [1] or poor [0]):<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center\"><a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/kotrc\/files\/2010\/08\/DiatomPreservation.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-medium wp-image-927\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/kotrc\/files\/2010\/08\/DiatomPreservation-300x171.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"171\" srcset=\"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/kotrc\/files\/2010\/08\/DiatomPreservation-300x171.png 300w, https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/kotrc\/files\/2010\/08\/DiatomPreservation-1024x585.png 1024w, https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/kotrc\/files\/2010\/08\/DiatomPreservation.png 1050w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left\">What exactly to make of this, I don&#8217;t know. Is the objective preservation data bogus? Have I made a mistake in calculating the three-timer statistic? Here&#8217;s the SIB\/RT ratio, for comparison, which should be similar to the three-timer statistic, with the only exception (that I can think of) that SIB and RT also count 1- and 2-timers. But somehow they ought to be qualitatively similar. The fact that this graph is all over the place makes me think I might have done something wrong with the three-timer function:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center\"><a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/kotrc\/files\/2010\/09\/DiatomPresSIBRT.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-medium wp-image-1031\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/kotrc\/files\/2010\/09\/DiatomPresSIBRT-300x171.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"171\" srcset=\"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/kotrc\/files\/2010\/09\/DiatomPresSIBRT-300x171.png 300w, https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/kotrc\/files\/2010\/09\/DiatomPresSIBRT-1024x585.png 1024w, https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/kotrc\/files\/2010\/09\/DiatomPresSIBRT.png 1050w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left\">Of course, the first-order shape of this graph (above) is a U, which is what&#8217;s expected even if preservation is uniform (but imperfect) through time. Because there&#8217;s more time either side of the middle, you&#8217;re more likely to identify missing taxa there. At the end points of the time series, you don&#8217;t know what taxa came before (at the beginning) or after (at the end), and so\u2014by definition\u2014your RT count is the same as your SIB count.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left\">\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Another spectacularly late start to the day. Whatever it is that&#8217;s making me this tired (the heat? visitor fatigue?), I hope I&#8217;m able to shake it this weekend. Although we do have more visitors coming. Ah well. At the end of the day, it&#8217;s productivity that counts, not hours, so time to shake the guilt [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2222,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[14607,13584],"tags":[16272],"class_list":["post-1021","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-research-journal","category-timekeeping","tag-diversitye-o"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/kotrc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1021","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/kotrc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/kotrc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/kotrc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2222"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/kotrc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1021"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/kotrc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1021\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1029,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/kotrc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1021\/revisions\/1029"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/kotrc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1021"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/kotrc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1021"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/kotrc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1021"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}