{"id":94,"date":"2014-05-08T14:27:44","date_gmt":"2014-05-08T14:27:44","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/kmckenna\/?p=94"},"modified":"2014-05-09T04:52:49","modified_gmt":"2014-05-09T04:52:49","slug":"week-11","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/kmckenna\/2014\/05\/08\/week-11\/","title":{"rendered":"Week 11: Complaint, Answered"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\"><a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/kmckenna\/files\/2014\/05\/IMG_4118-e1399559256849.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-95\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/kmckenna\/files\/2014\/05\/IMG_4118-e1399559256849-768x1024.jpg\" alt=\"IMG_4118\" width=\"584\" height=\"778\" srcset=\"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/kmckenna\/files\/2014\/05\/IMG_4118-e1399559256849-768x1024.jpg 768w, https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/kmckenna\/files\/2014\/05\/IMG_4118-e1399559256849-225x300.jpg 225w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 584px) 100vw, 584px\" \/><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\">Medium: watercolor<\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">Muhammad Iqbal\u2019s <i>Shikwa <\/i>and <i>Jawad e Shikwa <\/i>together comprise a fascinating commentary on the themes of declining Islamic power and the variations in Muslim identity. In <i>Shikwa<\/i>, or \u201cComplaint,\u201d Iqbal writes as a group of Muslims explaining their own religious virtues, lamenting the fall of the Islamic empire, and requesting that God remedy their problems. I found particularly amusing the rather strong language that was used in the <i>Shikwa. <\/i>Two of my favorite couplets are below:<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Now no more for us Thy favors Thy old benevolence<br \/>\nHow and wherefore is Thy pristine kindliness departed hence? (18)<\/p>\n<p>All we have is jeers from strangers, public shame, and poverty\u2014<br \/>\nIs disgrace our recompense for laying down our lives for Thee? (19)<\/p>\n<p class=\"p2\">The melodramatic language of the <i>Shikwa <\/i>has an especially satisfying foil in one of the opening scenes of the <i>Jawad e Shikwa<\/i>, or \u201cResponse to the The Complaint.\u201d After an introductory stanza, Iqbal includes a brief conversation between planets wondering aloud how the humans on earth had mustered the gall to sincerely voice complaints to the heavens:<\/p>\n<p class=\"p2\">Listening, the ancient Sphere said, \u201cSomeone seems to be about;\u201d<br \/>\nCried the planets, \u201cThere <i>is <\/i>someone, in the upper ether pure;\u201d<br \/>\n\u201cNot so lofty,\u201d called the Moon. \u201cDown on the earth there, not a doubt;\u201d<br \/>\n\u201cNo,\u201d the Milky Way retorted. \u201cHe is hiding here, for sure.\u201d<br \/>\nGuardian Rizwan, he if any, my complaint distinctly heard;<br \/>\n\u201cHe is man, just newly driven out of Eden,\u201d he averred. (38)<\/p>\n<p>All the angels in amazement shouted, \u201cWhy, whose voice is it?\u201d<br \/>\nDwellers in the firmament were baffled by the mystery.<br \/>\n\u201cShall a mortal man aspire in our high firmament to sit?<br \/>\nCan that little speck of dust take wings, and soar so loftily?<br \/>\nThey have clean forgot their manners, those inhabitants of earth;<br \/>\nWhat effrontery, what rudeness for such things of lowly birth!\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"p2\">I found this image to be an entertainingly snide response; it was quite effective in communicating the author\u2019s frustration with the tone of the <i>Shikwa<\/i>, and likely also with the tone of complaints Iqbal had heard in his own life. Dramatically demonstrating the beautiful insignificance of human life by describing planets unable to even confidently discern humans living on earth is quite bold. This boldness inspired me to focus on this image for this week\u2019s blog post. I interpreted the \u201cancient Sphere\u201d to be the sun. I drew just two planets in order to leave room for the majority of the painting to represent the empty space, in order to highlight the distance. I think part of the appeal of the image that the poem conjured was how unrealistic it was to imagine a conference of space items of drastically different locations and sizes. In order to carry this into the painting, I tried to arrange the four space items in a position that would be reminiscent of a meeting and tried to paint the space objects in a way that would highlight the absurdity of their placement and sizing.<\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">Although this image was interesting and well-placed within <i>Shikwa <\/i>and <i>Jawad e Shikwa<\/i>, I found it worthy of further thought because it highlights how views on religion and faith can vary so fundamentally. The politicization of different aspects of Islamic life (i.e. headscarves, apparel, calls to prayer, etc.) arises from discrepancy in views about religious practice. Here we see a great example of why these issues are so incredibly complicated and multilayered: If the relationship between God and humans can vary so drastically (the <i>Shikwa<\/i> alludes to a very close-watching God that is in major contrast to the image from the <i>Jawad e Shikwa<\/i> that I depicted in my painting), then naturally ideas about how to best serve or show allegiance to God will vary drastically.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p2\">Muhammad Iqbal, <i>Complaint and Answer<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Medium: watercolor Muhammad Iqbal\u2019s Shikwa and Jawad e Shikwa together comprise a fascinating commentary on the themes of declining Islamic power and the variations in Muslim identity. In Shikwa, or \u201cComplaint,\u201d Iqbal writes as a group of Muslims explaining their &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/kmckenna\/2014\/05\/08\/week-11\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6332,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[121917],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-94","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-creative-responses"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/kmckenna\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/94","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/kmckenna\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/kmckenna\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/kmckenna\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6332"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/kmckenna\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=94"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/kmckenna\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/94\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":108,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/kmckenna\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/94\/revisions\/108"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/kmckenna\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=94"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/kmckenna\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=94"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/kmckenna\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=94"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}