{"id":763,"date":"2014-06-21T15:58:53","date_gmt":"2014-06-21T19:58:53","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/jsinger\/?p=763"},"modified":"2014-06-21T15:58:53","modified_gmt":"2014-06-21T19:58:53","slug":"trademark-trial-and-appeal-board-cancels-trademark-for-washington-pro-football-team-name","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/jsinger\/2014\/06\/21\/trademark-trial-and-appeal-board-cancels-trademark-for-washington-pro-football-team-name\/","title":{"rendered":"Trademark Trial and Appeal Board cancels trademark for Washington pro football team name"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In another case in a long-running saga, the Patent and Trademark Office cancelled the federal registration for the &#8220;Washington Redskins&#8221; on the ground that the name is disparaging in violation of Section 2(a) of the Trademark Act of 1946, 15 U.S.C. \u00a71052(a). <a href=\"http:\/\/ttabvue.uspto.gov\/ttabvue\/v?pno=92046185&amp;pty=CAN&amp;eno=199\" target=\"_blank\">Blackhorse v. Pro-Football, <\/a>Inc., U.S. P.T.O. Canc. No. 92046185 (June 18, 2014).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In another case in a long-running saga, the Patent and Trademark Office cancelled the federal registration for the &#8220;Washington Redskins&#8221; on the ground that the name is disparaging in violation of Section 2(a) of the Trademark Act of 1946, 15 U.S.C. \u00a71052(a). Blackhorse v. Pro-Football, Inc., U.S. P.T.O. Canc. No. 92046185 (June 18, 2014).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2199,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[13476,28,14109],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-763","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-antidiscrimination-law","category-intellectual-property","category-tribal-property-2"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p5SHi7-cj","jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/jsinger\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/763","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/jsinger\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/jsinger\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/jsinger\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2199"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/jsinger\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=763"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/jsinger\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/763\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":764,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/jsinger\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/763\/revisions\/764"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/jsinger\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=763"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/jsinger\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=763"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/jsinger\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=763"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}