{"id":124,"date":"2009-10-19T08:36:23","date_gmt":"2009-10-19T12:36:23","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/jsinger\/?p=124"},"modified":"2009-10-19T08:40:11","modified_gmt":"2009-10-19T12:40:11","slug":"ninth-circuit-holds-rent-control-law-to-constitute-an-unconstitutional-taking-of-property","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/jsinger\/2009\/10\/19\/ninth-circuit-holds-rent-control-law-to-constitute-an-unconstitutional-taking-of-property\/","title":{"rendered":"Ninth Circuit holds rent control law to constitute an unconstitutional taking of property"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The Ninth Circuit ruled in <a href=\"\/\/www.ca9.uscourts.gov\/datastore\/opinions\/2009\/09\/28\/06-56306.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">Guggenheim v. Goleta<\/a> that a rent control law covering mobile homes violated the takings clause because it transferred 90% of the market value of the tenancy from the landlord to the tenants. The court distinguish Yee v. City of Escondido, 503 U.S. 519 (1992) on the ground that <em>Yee<\/em> held that such a law did not effectuate a &#8220;physical taking&#8221; but left open the question of whether the law constituted a regulatory taking under the <em>Penn Central<\/em> ad hoc test.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Ninth Circuit ruled in Guggenheim v. Goleta that a rent control law covering mobile homes violated the takings clause because it transferred 90% of the market value of the tenancy from the landlord to the tenants. The court distinguish Yee v. City of Escondido, 503 U.S. 519 (1992) on the ground that Yee held [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2199,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[13332],"tags":[13318,18757],"class_list":["post-124","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-takings","tag-regulatory-takings","tag-takings"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p5SHi7-20","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/jsinger\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/124","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/jsinger\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/jsinger\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/jsinger\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2199"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/jsinger\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=124"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/jsinger\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/124\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":127,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/jsinger\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/124\/revisions\/127"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/jsinger\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=124"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/jsinger\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=124"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/jsinger\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=124"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}