{"id":185,"date":"2004-01-14T09:10:27","date_gmt":"2004-01-14T13:10:27","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/jaskaran\/2004\/01\/14\/high-court-criticizes-anti-national-"},"modified":"2004-01-14T09:10:27","modified_gmt":"2004-01-14T13:10:27","slug":"high-court-criticizes-anti-national-elements","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/jaskaran\/2004\/01\/14\/high-court-criticizes-anti-national-elements\/","title":{"rendered":"High Court Criticizes &#8220;Anti-National Elements&#8221;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a name='a62'><\/a><\/p>\n<p><P><FONT face=\"Verdana,Geneva,Arial,Helvetica,Sans-Serif\" size=\"2\">The Gujarat High Court has released its <A href=\"http:\/\/www.indianexpress.com\/full_story.php?content_id=39133\">judgment<\/A> explaining its dismissal of the appeal filed in the Best Bakery case.&nbsp; Surprisingly, the Court did not believe Zaheera&#x2019;s own statement that she lied in court because she was threatened by the accused and their supporters.&nbsp; Instead, the Court wrote:<\/FONT><\/P><br \/>\n<BLOCKQUOTE><br \/>\n<P><FONT face=\"Verdana,Geneva,Arial,Helvetica,Sans-Serif\" size=\"2\"><EM>&#x201C;There seems to be a definite design and conspiracy to malign people by misusing this witness&#8230;she can easily fall prey to anyone and play in the dirty hands of anti-socials and anti-national elements.&#x201D;<\/EM><\/FONT><\/P><\/BLOCKQUOTE><br \/>\n<P><FONT face=\"Verdana,Geneva,Arial,Helvetica,Sans-Serif\" size=\"2\">This ignores the history of police intimidation of witnesses in human rights cases, from the cases filed against the accused in the 1984 pogroms against Sikhs, to the <A href=\"http:\/\/www.law.harvard.edu\/students\/orgs\/hrj\/iss15\/kaur.shtml#Heading126\">habeas corpus<\/A> cases filed on behalf of the disappeared in Punjab, among other examples.<\/FONT><\/P><br \/>\n<P><FONT face=\"Verdana,Geneva,Arial,Helvetica,Sans-Serif\" size=\"2\">The Court even criticized NGOs for documenting the abuses that occurred:<\/FONT><\/P><br \/>\n<BLOCKQUOTE><br \/>\n<P><FONT face=\"Verdana,Geneva,Arial,Helvetica,Sans-Serif\" size=\"2\"><EM>&#x2018;&#x2018;It appears that attempt is being made by journalist\/human right activist and advocates Teesta Setalvad and Mihir Desai to have a parallel investigation. We do not know how far it is proper but we can state that it is not permissible under law.&#x2019;&#x2019;<\/EM><\/FONT><\/P><\/BLOCKQUOTE><br \/>\n<P><FONT face=\"Verdana,Geneva,Arial,Helvetica,Sans-Serif\" size=\"2\">The <A href=\"http:\/\/www.indianexpress.com\/print.php?content_id=39151\">Indian Express<\/A> and <A href=\"http:\/\/www.hindustantimes.com\/2004\/Jan\/14\/printedition\/140104\/detEDI02.shtml\">Hindustan Times<\/A> have written editorials against this judgment.&nbsp; The Indian Express listed four reasons why the judgment saddened them:<\/FONT><\/P><br \/>\n<BLOCKQUOTE><br \/>\n<P><FONT face=\"Verdana,Geneva,Arial,Helvetica,Sans-Serif\" size=\"2\"><EM>Two, because this case had exercised not just the apex court, but the National Human Rights Commission, which had first sent a team to Ahmedabad to study it and followed this up with the unprecedented step of filing a special leave petition asking the apex court to set aside the judgment and call for a retrial of the case outside Gujarat. Three, because this case was one of the best documented of all the barbaric incidents that had occurred in post-Godhra Gujarat and if justice is not delivered in this case, it is unlikely that others would fare better.<\/EM><\/FONT><\/P><\/BLOCKQUOTE><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Gujarat High Court has released its judgment explaining its dismissal of the appeal filed in the Best Bakery case.&nbsp; Surprisingly, the Court did not believe Zaheera&#x2019;s own statement that she lied in court because she was threatened by the accused and their supporters.&nbsp; Instead, the Court wrote: &#x201C;There seems to be a definite design [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1193,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-185","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/jaskaran\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/185","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/jaskaran\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/jaskaran\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/jaskaran\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1193"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/jaskaran\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=185"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/jaskaran\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/185\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/jaskaran\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=185"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/jaskaran\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=185"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/jaskaran\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=185"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}