{"id":6,"date":"2005-01-13T14:06:18","date_gmt":"2005-01-13T18:06:18","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/globalfund\/hu-lost-france\/"},"modified":"2006-07-24T09:28:54","modified_gmt":"2006-07-24T13:28:54","slug":"hu-lost-france","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/globalfund\/2005\/01\/13\/hu-lost-france\/","title":{"rendered":"Hu lost France?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a name=\"a11\"><\/a>  <font size=\"4\"><span style=\"font-family: times new roman\">Today the <\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/news.ft.com\/cms\/s\/9722235c-64c3-11d9-9f8b-00000e2511c8.html\">Financial Times<\/a><span style=\"font-family: times new roman\"> reports on a new survey commissioned by the <\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/www.committee100.org\">Committee of 100<\/a><span style=\"font-family: times new roman\">, which describes itself as a &#8220;<\/span><\/font><font size=\"4\" face=\"Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif\" color=\"#333333\">non-partisan organization         composed of prominent American citizens of Chinese descent.&#8221;  The Times&#8217; headline proclaims <\/font><span style=\"font-family: times new roman\"><font size=\"4\"><span style=\"font-style: italic\">Chinese imports valued over US jobs<\/span>, but the published <a href=\"http:\/\/www.committee100.org\/Published\/survey\/20050113ExecutiveSummary.pdf\">results <\/a>don&#8217;t back it up. The only pieces of evidence are that <\/font><font size=\"4\">&#8230; <span style=\"font-style: italic\">over 60% &#8230; including union members, consider low <\/span><span style=\"font-style: italic\">cost goods from China as a benefit to the American consumer.  <\/span><span style=\"font-style: italic\">Over 70% <\/span>&#8230; <span style=\"font-style: italic\">consider economic trade with China as <\/span><span style=\"font-style: italic\">beneficial to the US.<\/span><\/font><br \/>\n<font size=\"4\"><br \/>\n<\/font><\/span><font size=\"4\"><span style=\"font-family: times new roman\">So? Cheap goods and brisk commerce are good in themselves, but the question is: how much of them will you trade for your neighbor&#8217;s job, and your own? We hope that the head of the polling firm is wrong when he says of the survey that <\/span><span style=\"font-style: italic; font-family: times new roman\">Americans are consumers first. <\/span><span style=\"font-family: times new roman\">Alas, it may be true, but there are some signs to the contrary: <\/span><span style=\"font-style: italic; font-family: times new roman\">64% of Opinion Leaders <\/span><span style=\"font-family: times new roman\">[and]<\/span><span style=\"font-style: italic; font-family: times new roman\"> 46% of the General Public <\/span><span style=\"font-family: times new roman\">&#8230;<\/span><span style=\"font-style: italic; font-family: times new roman\"> advocate linking China\u2019s trading status to its human rights record <\/span><span style=\"font-family: times new roman\">&#8230; and there are strong feelings in both groups against the country&#8217;s  military threat, degradation of the environment, etc.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: times new roman\"> In any event, we can&#8217;t take too seriously a poll financed by a committee of 100 China boosters.  Let&#8217;s<\/span><span style=\"font-family: times new roman\"> simply marvel that <\/span><span style=\"font-style: italic; font-family: times new roman\">Both Opinion Leader and General Public groups see China as an ally of the United States ranking above Saudi Arabia and France. <\/span><span style=\"font-family: times new roman\">And that<\/span><\/font> <span style=\"font-style: italic; font-family: times new roman\"><font size=\"4\"> Twenty three percent of Americans say that they have a friend or family member that adopted a Chinese baby.<br \/>\n<\/font><br \/>\n<\/span><font size=\"4\"><span style=\"font-family: times new roman\">To paraphrase Godfather Michael Corleone, I&#8217;m going to find out who the Chinese baby in my family is.<\/span><\/font><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Today the Financial Times reports on a new survey commissioned by the Committee of 100, which describes itself as a &#8220;non-partisan organization composed of prominent American citizens of Chinese descent.&#8221; The Times&#8217; headline proclaims Chinese imports valued over US jobs, but the published results don&#8217;t back it up. The only pieces of evidence are that [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":359,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[780],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-globalization"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/globalfund\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/globalfund\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/globalfund\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/globalfund\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/359"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/globalfund\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/globalfund\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/globalfund\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/globalfund\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/globalfund\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}