7 APRIL 2009, TUESDAY, DUSSELDORF, GERMANY<\/p>\n
The Technical University of Munich* \u2013 Bitter Struggle over Funding \u2013 4 (To be continued)<\/p>\n Source: Schultz, T., \u201cHochschulpakt \u2013 Erbitterter Verteilungskampf,\u201d Sueddeutsche Zeitung, 1 April 2009<\/p>\n *The Technical University of Munich, officially recognized by the German government as an \u201celite university,\u201d is ranked 67 among the world\u2019s universities. That is, for example, sixteen places below Seoul National University of South Korea. (The Times of London, Higher Education Supplement [THES], World University Rankings, 2007) And what about Germany?<\/em><\/p>\n Novel: http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/revision<\/p>\n \u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014-<\/p>\n 7 APRIL 2009, DIENSTAG, D\u00dcSSELDORF, DEUTSCHLAND<\/p>\n Die Technische Universit\u00e4t M\u00fcnchen* \u2013 Erbitterter Verteilungskampf \u2013 4 (Fortsetzung folgt.)<\/p>\n Quelle: Schultz, T., \u201eHochschulpakt \u2013 Erbitterter Verteilungskampf\u201c, S\u00fcddeutsche Zeitung, 01.04.2009<\/p>\n *Die Technische Universit\u00e4t M\u00fcnchen, eine durch die deutsche Regierung anerkannte \u201eElite-Universit\u00e4t\u201c, steht an der 67. Stelle in der Welt; d.h., zum Beispiel, 16 Stellen unter der Seoul National University von S\u00fcdkorea. (The Times of London, Higher Education Supplement [THES], World University Rankings, 2007) Und was ist mit Deutschland?<\/em><\/p>\n Novel: http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/revision\/ 7 APRIL 2009, TUESDAY, DUSSELDORF, GERMANY The Technical University of Munich* \u2013 Bitter Struggle over Funding \u2013 4 Three programs are included in a research and education package that totals 16 billion euros for German universities and various university-related institutes. The major disagreement is running along party lines and centers on the question of how […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":165,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[383],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1558","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-tu-munich"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/germany2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1558","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/germany2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/germany2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/germany2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/165"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/germany2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1558"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/germany2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1558\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/germany2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1558"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/germany2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1558"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/germany2\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1558"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
\n
\nThree programs are included in a research and education package that totals 16 billion euros for German universities and various university-related institutes. The major disagreement is running along party lines and centers on the question of how federal subsidies for expanding the number of university students should be distributed. A planned nationwide increase of space for an additional 275,000 students between 2011 and 2015 is especially controversial. Around seven billion euros is supposed to be invested in university construction and personnel, with the federal government paying half, and the rest coming from the states.<\/strong><\/p>\n
\n
\n\u201cWhile the traditional study-abroad sites for Americans \u2014 Britain, Italy, Spain and France \u2014 still attract more students from the United States, the report found that China is now the fifth-most-popular destination.\u201d \u2013 The New York Times, 17 November 2008<\/p>\n
\n
\nBei den drei Programmen geht es um insgesamt etwa 16 Milliarden Euro f\u00fcr die Hochschulen und au\u00dferuniversit\u00e4ren Institute. Der Streit verl\u00e4uft entlang den Parteilinien und entz\u00fcndet sich an der Frage, wie Bundeszusch\u00fcsse f\u00fcr neue Studienpl\u00e4tze verteilt werden sollen. Unstrittig ist, dass zwischen 2011 und 2015 bundesweit 275.000 zus\u00e4tzliche Studienpl\u00e4tze entstehen sollen. Etwa sieben Milliarden Euro sollen deshalb in den Ausbau und das Personal der Hochschulen investiert werden, je zur H\u00e4lfte finanziert von Bund und L\u00e4ndern.<\/strong><\/p>\n
\n
\n\u201eUnter Amerikanern, die im Ausland studieren, sind die beliebtesten L\u00e4nder Gro\u00dfbritannien, Italien, Spanien, Frankreich und China.\u201c \u2013 The New York Times, 17.11.2008.<\/p>\n
\n===========================================<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"