{"id":34,"date":"2005-06-23T11:48:34","date_gmt":"2005-06-23T15:48:34","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/fensterm\/2005\/06\/23\/is-this-dotart-ii\/"},"modified":"2005-06-23T11:48:34","modified_gmt":"2005-06-23T15:48:34","slug":"is-this-dotart-ii","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/fensterm\/2005\/06\/23\/is-this-dotart-ii\/","title":{"rendered":"Is this DotArt? II"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a name='a89'><\/a><\/p>\n<p>On comparative economic systems. Young Dr. Rainer thinks he knows what I think. He is probably wrong.<br \/>\nI will not presume to deny the barbarism that his relatives may have<br \/>\nsuffered due to Joseph Stalin. I am <span style=\"text-decoration: line-through;\">in general<\/span><br \/>\nunequivocally opposed to denying<br \/>\nholocausts. However, capitalism as currently configured does need more<br \/>\nthan a light rinse. The Russian economy, however, is a problem. If<br \/>\nProf. Cohen is right, that it cannot be considered capitalism by any<br \/>\nreasonable standard, is it an outlier? Millions of peoples lives<br \/>\nreduced to a dot that the &#8220;rational mind&#8221; should ignore. Weird<br \/>\n&#8220;science&#8221;. Worse than <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Dismal_science\">dismal<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/media-cyber.law.harvard.edu\/blogs\/static\/fensterm\/rinse.jpg\" height=\"480\" width=\"640\" border=\"0\">&#8220;&gt;<\/p>\n<p>Perhaps something like this will make a cleaner wash.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/media-cyber.law.harvard.edu\/blogs\/static\/fensterm\/windmill.jpg\" height=\"480\" width=\"640\" border=\"0\">&#8220;&gt;<\/p>\n<p>further, this is being done by the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ibew.org\/stories\/03journal\/0305\/p12.htm\">International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers<\/a>. [I&#8217;ll look into the treatment of the Electrical Sisters.] This <a href=\"http:\/\/www.boston.com\/news\/local\/articles\/2005\/05\/06\/for_commuters_a_primer_on_harnessing_wind\/\">windmill<\/a> is in Dorchester at the Freeport Street headquarters of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ibew103.com\/\">Local 103<\/a>. [And management says labor is <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Luddite\">Luddite<\/a>!<br \/>\nPishtosh I say! ] So bravo for the Brothers and Sisters. But are the<br \/>\nrest of us moving fast enough to avoid the further ravages of peak<br \/>\noil?&nbsp; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.hubbertpeak.com\/hubbert\/\">Dr. Hubbert<\/a> turned out to be right about U.S. oil production and predicted a similar phenomenon for world oil production. I can <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">prove<\/span> his theory. It was mentioned in an episode of the West Wing. Qued Erat Demonstrandum. I&#8217;m betting with him.<\/p>\n<p>Like everything else in my life, this is a work in progress. I need to<br \/>\nsee what fraction of GDP goes into the financial services sector before<br \/>\ndeciding if the &#8220;free market&#8221; is really a costless allocator of<br \/>\ncapital. The &#8220;empiricists&#8221; are loathe to consider this. Also, I need to<br \/>\nconsider whether the $0.3 Trillion &#8220;incursion&#8221; in Iraq can be ignored<br \/>\nas a perturbation or be renormalized away, before I decide if the &#8220;free<br \/>\nmarket&#8221; is unconstrained. The answer from upstairs so far, &#8220;That was<br \/>\ndone by another department.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;Dr. Hubbert was not an economist, but a geophysicist. But he had an interesting idea about the interaction between <a href=\"http:\/\/www.hubbertpeak.com\/hubbert\/monetary.htm\">physics and economics<\/a><br \/>\nor more correctly matter-energy and money.&nbsp; Matter-energy, of<br \/>\ncourse, is conserved. Money presumably is tied to real physical wealth,<br \/>\nbut the events of late 2001 clearly show how elastic that connection<br \/>\nis. Growth is assumed to be unbounded. [I guess we all agree that the<br \/>\nfirst derivative is bounded.] I think Dr. Hubbert is onto something,<br \/>\nbut should really factor in labor. Marx had to exist, because Smith<br \/>\nunderstood the power of the division of labor, but not the power of<br \/>\nwhat was being divided up. This will, of course, get you a job as an<br \/>\neconomist, but does it really lead to maximum productivity? <\/p>\n<p>In the U.S. economy over the last three and a half decades wealth has<br \/>\nmoved into fewer and fewer hands near the top of the distribution.<br \/>\n[There was a brief uptick in the Gini just before the crash of &#8217;01. The<br \/>\nundergraduate who argued that this was proof of &#8220;all boats being<br \/>\nlifted&#8221; never came back for re-examination. \ud83d\ude42 ] This may have<br \/>\nsupported the illusion among the movers and shakers that growth is some<br \/>\nkind of magic that is immune to physics. There is something special<br \/>\nabout life that it can appear to violate the 2nd Law [entropy]. But,<br \/>\nthat is only apparent. And we can no longer afford the illusion.<\/p>\n<p>[Tired. Later.]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>On comparative economic systems. Young Dr. Rainer thinks he knows what I think. He is probably wrong. I will not presume to deny the barbarism that his relatives may have suffered due to Joseph Stalin. I am in general unequivocally opposed to denying holocausts. However, capitalism as currently configured does need more than a light [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":168,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-34","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/fensterm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/34","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/fensterm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/fensterm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/fensterm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/168"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/fensterm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=34"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/fensterm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/34\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/fensterm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=34"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/fensterm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=34"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/fensterm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=34"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}