{"id":185,"date":"2006-07-21T05:46:54","date_gmt":"2006-07-21T09:46:54","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/fensterm\/2006\/07\/21\/its-time-to-think-the-unthinkable\/"},"modified":"2006-07-21T10:04:16","modified_gmt":"2006-07-21T14:04:16","slug":"its-time-to-think-the-unthinkable","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/fensterm\/2006\/07\/21\/its-time-to-think-the-unthinkable\/","title":{"rendered":"It&#8217;s Time to Think the Unthinkable"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"Cartoon of the vultures threatening the votingRights Actof 1965\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/fensterm\/files\/2006\/07\/191_cartoon_large.jpg\" \/>For me, &#8216;unthinkable&#8221; usually means thermonuclear war, but for the <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.blackcommentator.com\/191\/191_cover_voting_rights_dixon.html\">Black Commentator<\/a> it refers to the threat to the Voting Rights Act of 1965.<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<\/p>\n<p>The unpleasant truths of this political moment are:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 0.5in; text-indent: -0.25in\">1. Renewable portions of the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Voting_Rights_Act\">Voting Rights Act of 1965<\/a>                (VRA) seem increasingly likely to die in the Congress this session.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 0.5in; text-indent: -0.25in\">2. Recent Supreme Court decisions indicate the court is inclined                to \u201c<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.prospect.org\/web\/page.ww?section=root&amp;name=ViewWeb&amp;articleId=11688\">interpret<\/a>\u201d                permanent provisions of the Voting Rights Act into meaninglessness.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 0.5in; text-indent: -0.25in\">3. Democrats in the US. House and Senate seem disinclined to fight very hard for the voting rights of blacks, and;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 0.5in; text-indent: -0.25in\">4. With no superpower rival on the international scene and the domestic mass movement disbanded and sent home a generation ago, the powers that be face little or no meaningful consequences at home or abroad for killing the VRA.<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;&#8212;-<\/p>\n<p>The <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.blackcommentator.com\/191\/191_cover_voting_rights_dixon.html\">full article<\/a> includes a brief and cogent history of voter disenfranchisement in the south. The Associated Press reports that the <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/news.yahoo.com\/s\/ap\/20060721\/ap_on_go_co\/voting_rights_12\">Senate passed renewal of the Act  98-0<\/a>. Last week the House passed renewal 390-33. Bush vowed to sign it in his speech before the NAACP. I can&#8217;t tell exactly how intact the Act is and how significant it is. The AP report mentions that the &#8220;preclearance&#8221; by the Department of Justice of changes to voting procedures in specified southern states has survived challenge by sourthern lawmakers. But with the current DOJ [under <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/articles\/A48446-2005Jan4.html\">Alberto &#8216;torture guy&#8217; Gonzales<\/a>], how much protection is this? On the other hand, the renewal has a life of 25 years and might mean more down the road.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>For me, &#8216;unthinkable&#8221; usually means thermonuclear war, but for the Black Commentator it refers to the threat to the Voting Rights Act of 1965. &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212; The unpleasant truths of this political moment are: 1. Renewable portions of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (VRA) seem increasingly likely to die in the Congress this session. 2. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":168,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-185","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/fensterm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/185","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/fensterm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/fensterm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/fensterm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/168"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/fensterm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=185"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/fensterm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/185\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/fensterm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=185"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/fensterm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=185"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/fensterm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=185"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}