{"id":9988,"date":"2008-09-21T19:34:35","date_gmt":"2008-09-22T00:34:35","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/?p=9988"},"modified":"2011-08-05T14:53:20","modified_gmt":"2011-08-05T18:53:20","slug":"lawyers-eliminating-witnesses-oh-cisco","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/2008\/09\/21\/lawyers-eliminating-witnesses-oh-cisco\/","title":{"rendered":"lawyers eliminating witnesses: oh, Cisco!"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: right\"><a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/files\/2008\/09\/robertsimels_2.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-medium wp-image-9996\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/files\/2008\/09\/robertsimels_2.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"61\" height=\"75\" \/><\/a> . . . . . . <strong>Robert Simels &amp; A. W. Parker<\/strong> . . . . . <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/files\/2008\/09\/istanfordjolley_2.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-medium wp-image-9997\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/files\/2008\/09\/istanfordjolley_2.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"79\" height=\"79\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left\"><em><strong>T<\/strong><\/em>he <em>New York Times<\/em> recently noted that &#8220;The federal complaint against Robert Simels, a well-known New York criminal defense lawyer, reads like a script from an HBO crime drama.&#8221;\u00a0 &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2008\/09\/11\/nyregion\/11arrest.html?_r=2&amp;scp=1&amp;sq=Robert%20Simels&amp;st=cse&amp;oref=slogin&amp;oref=slogin\">Defense Lawyer Charged With Witness Tampering<\/a>&#8221; (Sept. 11, 2008).\u00a0 That&#8217;s because<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;padding-left: 60px\">&#8220;Mr. Simels, who has represented some of New York\u2019s most notorious gangsters and rappers and an assortment of athletes and celebrities, was arrested on Wednesday and charged in what officials said was a plot to \u201cneutralize\u201d witnesses who were willing to testify against one of his clients [Shaheed Khan, an accused drug kingpin with reputed ties to the Guyanese government].&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;padding-left: 30px\">&#8212; Read more about the indictment of Bob Simels at the <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.wsj.com\/law\/2008\/09\/11\/former-prosecutor-charged-with-plot-to-neutralize-witnesses\/\"><em>WSJ Law Blog<\/em><\/a>, and <a href=\"http:\/\/blog.simplejustice.us\/2008\/09\/11\/bob-simels-indicted-in-plot-to-eliminate-witnesses.aspx\"><em>Simple Justice<\/em><\/a>, which links to <a href=\"http:\/\/online.wsj.com\/public\/resources\/documents\/simels.pdf\">this affidavit in support of the arrest warrant<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/Best-Cisco-Kid-35-Episodes\/dp\/B001072DFM\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-medium wp-image-9993\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/files\/2008\/09\/51wybaivhjl_sl500_aa240_.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"62\" height=\"85\" \/><\/a> It may seem like an HBO crime episode, but while I was watching my favorite <a href=\"http:\/\/www.walmart.com\/catalog\/product.do?product_id=9193198\">$5 dvd<\/a> this afternoon, I discovered that the Simels tale also &#8220;reads like a script&#8221; from the classic 1950&#8217;s network tv western <em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.pioneertown.com\/view\/theciscokid.html\">The Cisco Kid<\/a><\/em>.\u00a0 Trying to avoid any serious punditry today, I put a disc from &#8220;<em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/Best-Cisco-Kid-35-Episodes\/dp\/B001072DFM\">The Best of the Cisco Kid<\/a><\/em>&#8221; in my dvd player.\u00a0 The first episode I played, out of the 35 on the 3-disc set, was &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.imdb.com\/title\/tt0541810\/\">Confession for Money<\/a>,&#8221; from the show&#8217;s first season.\u00a0 Unless I was in Mama G&#8217;s lap, at 13 months old, when she watched its original broadcast on January 2, 1951, it was my first time seeing &#8220;Confession for Money.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The story opens with the fictional lawyer A. W. Parker (played by <a href=\"http:\/\/www.imdb.com\/name\/nm0427157\/bio\">I. [Isaac, &#8220;Ike&#8221;] Stanford Jolley<\/a>) visiting his jailed client Tom Tracey.\u00a0 We quickly learn that the Cisco Kid and his sidekick Pancho Gonzales were witnesses to Tracey killing a popular banker and were due in town that morning to identify Tracy for the Sheriff.<\/p>\n<p>Here&#8217;s an outline of the <em>Cisco Kid<\/em>&#8216;s lawyer-gone-bad tale:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/files\/2008\/09\/cisco.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-medium wp-image-9991\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/files\/2008\/09\/cisco.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"116\" height=\"62\" \/><\/a> Lawyer Parker suggests to Tracey that they break him out of the jail and then split the $75,000 take from the bank robbery<\/li>\n<li>Tracey says they don&#8217;t have time, with Cisco arriving soon, and that they instead need to kill the witnesses before they identify him.\u00a0 Parker quickly accedes to his client&#8217;s idea, and sends two bad guys with rifles to ambush and kill Cisco and Pancho.<\/li>\n<li>When the bad guys flub the ambush, Lawyer Parker is mighty irked.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li>Parker then draws up a false confession for a young man who is desperate to get $5000 for an operation for his sick mother (one more skewed decision due to the lack of universal health care coverage).\u00a0 Parker tells the kid they&#8217;ll spring him from jail before trial. The Sheriff lets Tracey go and jails the kid, once he sees the confession.<\/li>\n<li>To make sure the youthful confessor doesn&#8217;t change his mind, Tracey has his gang whip up a lynch mob, but Cisco and Pancho sneak him out of the jail.<\/li>\n<li>Parker joins the lynching posse that chases Cisco and the misguided youth, and they end up in the usual shootout behind really big rocks.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li>The Sheriff arrives and tells the mob to put down their guns.\u00a0 Parker jumps on his horse and heads back to get his papers and split town.\u00a0 Cisco follows and catches Parker in the getaway cabin, but Tracey arrives and Parker takes away Cisco&#8217;s gun, handing it to his client. And, then . . . (see below for the exciting conclusion).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/files\/2008\/09\/robertsimels.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-medium wp-image-9990\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/files\/2008\/09\/robertsimels.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"53\" height=\"67\" \/><\/a> If the ugly allegations against the well-known NYC criminal defense lawyer Bob Simels turn out to be true, life as he has known it will change drastically. Scott at <em>Simple Justice<\/em> tells us:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 60px\">&#8220;Though a bit on the arrogant side (and who isn&#8217;t in this business) and not exactly a warm and fuzzy guy, he&#8217;s smart and well-respected.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Sixty-one-year-old Bob Simels appears to be the sort of Baby Boomer who would have grown up watching <em>The Cisco Kid<\/em>. Had Simels recalled the &#8220;Confession for Money&#8221; episode, he might have just said &#8220;no&#8221; to the whole idea of turning outlaw with his clients.\u00a0 You see:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 60px\"><a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/files\/2008\/09\/istanfordjolley.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-medium wp-image-9989\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/files\/2008\/09\/istanfordjolley.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"52\" height=\"52\" \/><\/a> Lawyer A. W. Parker had planned to split the loot and split the territory with killer Tom Tracey.\u00a0 But, before Cisco could subdue the two of them, Tracey holds up his money satchel and tells his\u00a0 lawyer, &#8220;I was gonna take you with me, Parker, but I just couldn&#8217;t find room for you in my bag.&#8221; He then shoots Parker dead.\u00a0 Of course, Cisco wins the ensuing fistfight with Tracey and brings him back to town to face trial on two counts of murder.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px\">&#8212; By the way, there was a real-life 19th Century New York lawyer who went by the name A. W. Parker.\u00a0 Thanks to the Google digitalization project, I found him representing the appellant in the case of <a href=\"http:\/\/books.google.com\/books?id=0Co8AAAAIAAJ&amp;pg=PA222&amp;lpg=PA222&amp;dq=%22A.+W.+Parker%22+lawyer&amp;source=web&amp;ots=DcfenL77JR&amp;sig=AmTJBRlbBn2vAFqGo7KvT7oX_bg&amp;hl=en&amp;sa=X&amp;oi=book_result&amp;resnum=7&amp;ct=result#PPA221,M1\"><em>Benner v. Atlantic Dredging Co<\/em><\/a>. (NY Ct. of Appeals, 1892).\u00a0 The real Lawyer Parker apparently did negligence defense work.\u00a0 He helped his client reverse a judgment against it for damage that occured to a house that was near a site where the dredging firm was blasting rocks in a harbor for the Army Corps of Engineers.<\/p>\n<p>The <a href=\"http:\/\/www.simelslaw.com\/index.html\">Simels Law Firm website<\/a> is no longer accessible.\u00a0 According to <a href=\"http:\/\/propagandapress.wordpress.com\/2008\/09\/11\/welcome-to-the-robert-m-simels-pc-website\/\">Propaganda Press<\/a>, however, the Welcome Page at the Robert Simels firm contains this perhaps ironic paragraph (emphasis added):<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px\">&#8220;I have handled many high-profile cases, with an outstanding success rate across a broad range of issues. <em>The key to our many acquittals in criminal cases and multimillion dollar verdicts for our clients is preparation and complete participation by our clients<\/em> which result in highly effective and compelling cases in the courtroom.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>You can find much more about Robert Simels and his career, in <a href=\"http:\/\/www.acorn-online.com\/joomla15\/index.php?option=com_content&amp;view=article&amp;id=8534:waccabuc-resident-arrested-for-witness-tampering&amp;catid=19:lewisboro-news&amp;Itemid=79\">this Sept. 11 article<\/a> from his hometown newspaper, the <em>Lewisboro Ledger<\/em>.\u00a0 As you surely know by now, the <em>f\/k\/a<\/em> Gang doesn&#8217;t go for cheap, obvious jokes.\u00a0 But, we&#8217;re really surprised that other, less classy weblogs, haven&#8217;t pointed out the town where he resides &#8212;\u00a0 <a href=\"http:\/\/newyork.hometownlocator.com\/NY\/Westchester\/Waccabuc.cfm\">Waccabuc<\/a>, which is a hamlet in Lewisboro, Westchester County, New York.\u00a0 Fortunately, neither Cisco and Pancho, nor most lawyers I&#8217;ve known, would whack a witness for a buck, or a laugh.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px\"><a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/files\/2008\/09\/51wybaivhjl_sl500_aa240__2.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-medium wp-image-9992\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/files\/2008\/09\/51wybaivhjl_sl500_aa240__2.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"73\" height=\"70\" \/><\/a><strong><em> p.s.<\/em><\/strong> I think even our toughest critics will agree that this lengthy, time-consuming detour into Witness Elimination Lore was a highly successful piece of Procrastination Punditry.\u00a0 It certainly has left us with no energy nor inclination to write any serious commentary this evening.\u00a0 In honor of the many hours I will surely devote to watching the Cisco and Pancho in days to come, I inaugurated a new posting category today called &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/category\/procrastination-punditry\/\">Procrastination Punditry<\/a>.&#8221;\u00a0 We&#8217;ll be using it whenever there is virtually no excuse for a post other than our avoiding doing something more pressing and important.<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>high noon<br \/>\nthe boys refill<br \/>\ntheir water pistols<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 90px\">\u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026 by <a href=\"..\/tom-painting-archive\/\">Tom Painting<\/a> &#8211;  July Selection, Snapshot Press 2005 Haiku Calendar<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: center\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/files\/2008\/01\/morningshadowshaigaonlines.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"85\" height=\"97\" \/><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: center\">morning shadows\u2014<br \/>\nthe gunslingers wait<br \/>\nfor high noon<\/p>\n<p>\u2026\u2026.. by <a href=\"..\/dagosans-archives\/\">David Giacalone<\/a>, <em>Legal Studies Forum <\/em>(Vol. XXXII, No. 1. 2008). Click for the original haiga (photo with poem) <a href=\"http:\/\/www.haigaonline.com\/issue7-2\/dg-ag\/01.htm\">at <em>HaigaOnline<\/em><\/a>, Issue 7-2 (Autumn-Winter 2006), photo by Arthur Giacalone, JD.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>. . . . . . Robert Simels &amp; A. W. Parker . . . . . The New York Times recently noted that &#8220;The federal complaint against Robert Simels, a well-known New York criminal defense lawyer, reads like a script from an HBO crime drama.&#8221;\u00a0 &#8220;Defense Lawyer Charged With Witness Tampering&#8221; (Sept. 11, 2008).\u00a0 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":94,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[3513,3097],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-9988","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-lawyer-news-or-ethics","category-procrastination-punditry"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p6kP1R-2B6","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9988","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/94"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9988"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9988\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":12173,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9988\/revisions\/12173"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9988"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9988"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9988"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}