{"id":8671,"date":"2003-09-27T20:35:02","date_gmt":"2003-09-28T01:35:02","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/2003\/09\/27\/20030927a296\/"},"modified":"2011-08-05T15:00:38","modified_gmt":"2011-08-05T19:00:38","slug":"schiltzhappyhealthylawyer","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/2003\/09\/27\/schiltzhappyhealthylawyer\/","title":{"rendered":"Schiltz&#8217;s &#8220;Sermon&#8221; Should Be Mandatory Reading for Everyone Who Cares About Lawyers and the Legal Profession"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"newsItemDesc\">\n<blockquote>\n<blockquote><p><em>Editor&#8217;s Note<\/em>:  Below you will find the opening of a lengthy posting that was inadvertently deleted from the archives of this weblog, and which had summarized or quoted key portions of Professor\/Dean [now federal district judge] Schiltz&#8217;s article,&#8221;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.averyindex.com\/happy_healthy_ethical.php\">On Being a Happy, Healthy, and Ethical Member of an Unhappy, Unhealthy, and Unethical Profession<\/a>,&#8221; 52 Vand. L. Rev. 871 (81 pp pdf).  As argued below, it is well worth reading in its entirety, or &#8212; at the very least &#8212; in the condensed form found in the <em>Bar News<\/em> publication of the Washington State Bar Assn, &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.wsba.org\/media\/publications\/barnews\/archives\/2000\/jan-00-money.htm\">Money and Ethics: The Young Lawyer&#8217;s Conundrum<\/a>&#8221; (January 2000).\u00a0 Also see our post, &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/2006\/03\/29\/do-lawyers-choose-to-be-unhappy\/\">Do lawyers choose to be unhappy<\/a>&#8221; (March 29, 2006).<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: Arial;font-size: x-small\">Today, I&#8217;m preaching (not posting).  It may be four  years old, but the law review <\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/seoulover.blogs.com\/westlaw\/files\/being_a_happy_lawyer.pdf\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial;font-size: x-small\">article<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-family: Arial\"><span style=\"font-size: x-small\"><em><strong> On Being a  Happy, Healthy, and Ethical Member of an Unhappy, Unhealthy, and Unethical  Profession<\/strong><\/em>, 52 Vand. L. Rev. 871, by Professor Patrick J. Schiltz, is a &#8220;must read&#8221; for anyone who truly cares about the well-being of  individual lawyers and about the future of the legal profession &#8212; that should  include <em>every<\/em> law school applicant and student, recent graduate,  professor, school administrator, firm managing partner, bar leader, and  practicing attorney.  (College and high school counselors, parents, spouses, and  significant others, should also take a close look.)  The <em>Schiltz  Article<\/em> provides scholarship, perspective and context to help explain the  recent <em>Boston Globe<\/em>\/LexisOne puff piece <\/span><\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/www.lexisone.com\/balancing\/articles\/b090003a.html\"><em><span style=\"font-family: Arial;font-size: x-small\">Lawyers Questioning, Abandoning Their  Profession<\/span><\/em><\/a><span style=\"font-family: Arial\"><span style=\"font-size: x-small\"><em> <\/em>(by Ralph  Ranalli, Sept. 2003), while underscoring the <em>City Journal<\/em> article  &#8220;<\/span><\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/www.city-journal.org\/html\/7_1_a2.html\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial;font-size: x-small\">My Life As a Law Associate<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-family: Arial;font-size: x-small\">,&#8221; by Jonathan Foreman (Winter, 1997), which was recently cited at <\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/civpro.blogs.com\/civil_procedure\/2003\/09\/a_day_in_the_li.html\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial;font-size: x-small\">Civil Procedure<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-family: Arial;font-size: x-small\"> and <\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/myshingle.com\/article.pl?sid=03\/09\/25\/057225\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial;font-size: x-small\">MyShingle<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-family: Arial;font-size: x-small\">. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: Arial;font-size: x-small\">In many ways, our profession is in such a sorry  state because law schools and firms have adopted and perpetuated [perpetrated?]  lowest-common-denominator values (mostly driven by greed and made worse by  pretension), and because <em>individual<\/em> attorneys have gladly or blindly  embraced those values.   Too many lawyers have then decided to live with, and  made excuses for, the intolerable consequences.   That&#8217;s the bad news.  The good  news is that individuals <em>can choose better values<\/em> in order to give  better career advice, change institutions, or make corrections in their  lives. <\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Editor&#8217;s Note: Below you will find the opening of a lengthy posting that was inadvertently deleted from the archives of this weblog, and which had summarized or quoted key portions of Professor\/Dean [now federal district judge] Schiltz&#8217;s article,&#8221;On Being a Happy, Healthy, and Ethical Member of an Unhappy, Unhealthy, and Unethical Profession,&#8221; 52 Vand. L. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":94,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[2926,900],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-8671","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-pre-06-2006","category-viewpoint"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p6kP1R-2fR","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8671","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/94"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8671"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8671\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":14120,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8671\/revisions\/14120"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8671"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8671"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8671"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}