{"id":6431,"date":"2004-01-15T22:59:15","date_gmt":"2004-01-16T02:59:15","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/formerlyknownas\/2004\/01\/15\/curbing-multiple-billing-in-s"},"modified":"2011-08-05T15:00:31","modified_gmt":"2011-08-05T19:00:31","slug":"curbing-multiple-billing-in-san-jose-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/2004\/01\/15\/curbing-multiple-billing-in-san-jose-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Curbing Multiple Billing in San Jose"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/a><\/p>\n

\"trashman\"  California District Court Judge Gregory Ward will soon have to decide whether the City of San Jose must pay a $841,000 bill for legal services performed by 79-year-old attorney Robert Mezzetti Sr., in a condemnation case the City lost.  If Judge Ward needs any help, I’d be pleased to assist in tossing the bill into the trash and carrying it to the curb.<\/FONT><\/P>
\n

You see, when Mezzetti’s firm did an hour of work on the case, it billed multiple tenants $300 each per hour — fourteen separate clients<\/STRONG>.   When the Mazzetti firm did four hours of work, therefore, it billed each of the fourteen clients $1200 ($16,800 for a half day of work).  Mazzetti says: “The way things are done depends completely on the fee arrangement and the agreement with the parties.”   Well, each of his clients might be dying to pay him for his success in stopping the mall condemndation, but the City (and its taxpayers) certainly should not have to be so generous.   After closely looking at the hours submitted, and the reasonableness of the $300 per hour fee, I’d suggest that Judge Ward multiply the approved number of actual <\/EM>hours by the approved hourly rate.<\/FONT><\/P>
\n

The reporter states in the article that:<\/FONT><\/P>
\n


\n

“Legal ethics experts say the practice of multiple billing is not unheard of — but is generally frowned upon. A 1993 American Bar Association ethics opinion said that absent a contrary understanding, a lawyer should not bill more time than he or she spends on a matter. “A lawyer who spends four hours of time on behalf of three clients has not earned 12 billable hours,” the opinion says.”<\/FONT><\/P><\/BLOCKQUOTE>
\n

Meanwhile, the responsibile persons might want to check out California’s rules of attorney conduct to see how lawyer Mazzetti’s multiple billing shapes up under Rule 4-200<\/A>.   Among the factors to include, when deciding the “conscionability of a fee” are:<\/FONT><\/DIV>
\n