{"id":5284,"date":"2006-04-26T01:05:48","date_gmt":"2006-04-26T05:05:48","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/formerlyknownas\/2006\/04\/26\/aai-issues-paper-on-amd-v-int"},"modified":"2011-08-05T14:53:58","modified_gmt":"2011-08-05T18:53:58","slug":"aai-issues-paper-on-amd-v-intel-and-will-hold-press-conference","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/2006\/04\/26\/aai-issues-paper-on-amd-v-intel-and-will-hold-press-conference\/","title":{"rendered":"AAI issues Paper on AMD v. Intel and will hold Press Conference"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/a><\/p>\n

\n


\n
As <\/FONT>Vitaly Friedman<\/FONT><\/A> asserted last year, “The stage is set for the biggest tech <\/FONT><\/FONT><\/DIV>
\n
battle in years: the antitrust lawsuit filed by AMD against rival Intel.”  Last week, <\/FONT><\/DIV>
\n
various sources noted that a <\/FONT>Timeline has been set<\/FONT><\/A> for the AMD\/Intel case. (see <\/FONT><\/DIV>
\n
The TechReport<\/FONT><\/A><\/EM>, April, 21, 2006; Slashdot<\/FONT><\/A><\/EM>. April 21, 2006; via Antitrust Review<\/FONT><\/A><\/EM>,<\/FONT><\/DIV>
\n
 April 22, 2006).  TechRepor<\/EM>t noted <\/FONT><\/DIV>
\n

\n
“A protective order designed to limit information disclosure in order <\/FONT><\/DIV>
\n
to protect trade secrets will be submitted on May 22. The parties <\/FONT><\/DIV>
\n
will meet again in September to agree on a trial date, and the cut-<\/FONT><\/DIV>
\n
off for document production will take place on December 31, 2006.”<\/FONT><\/DIV><\/BLOCKQUOTE>
\n
\"NoloSharkSF\" “noloSharkS” <\/FONT><\/DIV>
\n
nolo.com<\/EM><\/FONT><\/A><\/FONT><\/DIV>
\n
<\/FONT> <\/DIV>
\n
While others are reporting on surface issues, the American Antitrust Institute<\/FONT><\/A>‘s <\/FONT><\/DIV>
\n
Senior Fellow, Jonathan Rubin, has prepared an 18-page analysis titled <\/FONT><\/DIV>
\n
“<\/FONT>AMD v. Intel<\/EM>: A Briefing<\/A>  Paper on the Next Landmark Monopolization Case.,”<\/FONT><\/FONT><\/A>, <\/FONT><\/DIV>
\n
(April 25, 2006), which “describes the federal court case of AMD v. Intel<\/EM>, providing <\/FONT><\/DIV>
\n
background on the industry, on the case itself, and on the international context of <\/FONT><\/DIV>
\n
the case and of monopolization doctrine.”<\/FONT><\/DIV>
\n

\n
“The primary purpose of this AAI Briefing Paper is to highlight the signifi-<\/FONT><\/DIV>
\n
cance of AMD v. Intel <\/I>as a case that will affect virtually the entire high-<\/FONT><\/DIV>
\n
technology sector of the global economy while at the same time it will <\/FONT><\/DIV>
\n
have a dramatic effect worldwide on the jurisprudence of the law concerning <\/FONT><\/DIV>
\n
dominant firms. This AAI Briefing Paper provides background both on the <\/FONT><\/DIV>
\n
case itself and on a variety of developments in the monopolization field that <\/FONT><\/DIV>
\n
provide further context.<\/FONT><\/DIV>
\n
<\/FONT> <\/DIV>
\n
“AAImastN”<\/FONT><\/DIV><\/BLOCKQUOTE>
\n
In addition, tomorrow, Thursday (April 27, 2006), Jon Rubin, Bob Lande, and AAI <\/FONT><\/DIV>
\n
President Bert Foer will do a telephonic press conference<\/EM> to summarize the paper <\/FONT><\/DIV>
\n
and take questions from the press<\/EM>.  <\/FONT><\/DIV>
\n
<\/FONT> <\/DIV>
\n
update<\/FONT><\/STRONG><\/EM>: The telephone press conference will be <\/FONT>held: <\/FONT><\/DIV>
\n

\n
11:00 a.m. EDT (8:00 a.m. PDT) on Thursday, April 27th <\/FONT><\/DIV>
\n
  – Dial-in:  (866) 814-8478<\/DIV>
\n
  – Outside the USA: (703) 639-1371 <\/DIV><\/BLOCKQUOTE><\/BLOCKQUOTE>
\n

\n

\n

\n
For more information, contract <\/FONT><\/DIV>
\n

\n
Jonathan Rubin, author of the Briefing Paper<\/FONT><\/DIV>
\n
JRubin@antitrustinstitute.org<\/A><\/FONT> <\/FONT><\/DIV>
\n
(202) 415-0616<\/FONT><\/DIV>
\n
<\/FONT> <\/DIV>
\n
Bert Foer, AAI President  <\/FONT><\/DIV>
\n
BFoer@antitrustinstitute.org<\/FONT><\/A>, <\/FONT><\/DIV>
\n
phone  (202) 276-6002 <\/FONT><\/DIV>
\n
<\/FONT> <\/DIV>
\n
or Prof. Robert H. Lande (U. Balt. Law) <\/FONT><\/DIV>
\n
RLande@antitrustinstitute.org<\/FONT><\/A> <\/FONT><\/DIV>
\n
(301) 585-5229<\/FONT><\/DIV>
\n
<\/FONT> <\/DIV><\/BLOCKQUOTE><\/BLOCKQUOTE><\/BLOCKQUOTE>
\n
   <\/FONT><\/FONT><\/DIV>
\n
                                                                               \"NoloSharkSFN\"   “noloSharkSN”<\/FONT><\/DIV>
\n
<\/FONT> <\/DIV>
\n
 <\/DIV>
\n
<\/FONT> <\/DIV>
\n
a battle royal
with radishes…
children<\/FONT><\/DIV>
\n
<\/FONT> <\/DIV>
\n
<\/FONT> <\/DIV>
\n

\n

\n

\n
scrawny frog, fight on!
Issa
to the rescue<\/FONT><\/DIV>
\n
<\/FONT> <\/DIV>
\n
<\/FONT> <\/DIV>
\n
<\/FONT> <\/DIV>
\n
<\/FONT> <\/DIV>
\n
<\/FONT> <\/DIV><\/BLOCKQUOTE>
\n
in plum blossom scent
they stop fighting…
crows
<\/FONT><\/DIV>
\n

\n
<\/FONT> <\/DIV>
\n
<\/FONT> <\/DIV>
\n
<\/FONT> <\/DIV>
\n

\n

\n

\n
in plum blossom scent
they stop fighting…
crows<\/FONT><\/DIV>
\n
<\/FONT> <\/DIV>
\n
<\/FONT> <\/DIV>
\n
<\/FONT> <\/DIV>
\n
<\/FONT> <\/DIV>
\n
<\/FONT> <\/DIV>
\n
<\/FONT> <\/DIV><\/BLOCKQUOTE><\/BLOCKQUOTE><\/BLOCKQUOTE><\/BLOCKQUOTE>
\n
liesure time–
in cherry blossom shade
picking fights<\/FONT><\/DIV>
\n
<\/FONT> <\/DIV>
\n
<\/FONT> <\/DIV>
\n
<\/FONT> <\/DIV>
\n

\n

\n

\n
fighting the mountain wind
on foot…
a wren<\/FONT><\/DIV><\/BLOCKQUOTE><\/BLOCKQUOTE><\/BLOCKQUOTE><\/BLOCKQUOTE>
\n
    
\n
Kobayashi Issa<\/STRONG><\/FONT><\/A><\/DIV>
\n
translated by <\/FONT>David G.Lanoue<\/STRONG><\/FONT><\/A>   <\/DIV>
\n
                                                                                       <\/FONT> \"microphoneF\"<\/FONT><\/DIV><\/DIV>
\n
<\/FONT> <\/DIV>
\n
 <\/DIV><\/BLOCKQUOTE><\/BLOCKQUOTE><\/BLOCKQUOTE><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

As Vitaly Friedman asserted last year, “The stage is set for the biggest tech battle in years: the antitrust lawsuit filed by AMD against rival Intel.”  Last week, various sources noted that a Timeline has been set for the AMD\/Intel case. (see The TechReport, April, 21, 2006; Slashdot. April 21, 2006; via Antitrust Review,  April 22, 2006).  TechReport noted […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":94,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[2926],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5284","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-pre-06-2006"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p6kP1R-1ne","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5284","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/94"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5284"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5284\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":12672,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5284\/revisions\/12672"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5284"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5284"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5284"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}