{"id":5192,"date":"2004-12-13T23:57:57","date_gmt":"2004-12-14T03:57:57","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/formerlyknownas\/2004\/12\/13\/lani-guinier-could-clear-this"},"modified":"2011-08-05T14:58:08","modified_gmt":"2011-08-05T18:58:08","slug":"lani-guinier-could-clear-this-up","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/2004\/12\/13\/lani-guinier-could-clear-this-up\/","title":{"rendered":"lani guinier could clear this up"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

Earlier today, <\/FONT>Eugene Volokh<\/FONT><\/A> echoed <\/FONT>David Kravitz<\/FONT><\/A>‘s complaint that the “mainstream press”<\/FONT><\/FONT><\/DIV>
\n
has apparently falsely <\/FONT>accused<\/FONT><\/A> Harvard Law Prof. <\/FONT>Lani Guinier<\/FONT><\/A> of failing to pay Social Security<\/FONT><\/DIV>
\n
taxes for a domestic worker in her employ.  They decry the irresponsible, sloppy journalism and<\/FONT><\/DIV>
\n
suggest it means the mainstream press can’t be trusted on other issues.   Both cover their butts<\/FONT><\/DIV>
\n
by asking to be corrected, if they are wrong about the facts from 1993.<\/FONT><\/DIV>
\n
<\/FONT> <\/DIV>
\n
\"journalist\" A few things bother me about this: <\/FONT><\/DIV>
\n