{"id":5178,"date":"2004-12-07T13:46:16","date_gmt":"2004-12-07T17:46:16","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/formerlyknownas\/2004\/12\/07\/nonymously-yours\/"},"modified":"2011-08-05T14:58:09","modified_gmt":"2011-08-05T18:58:09","slug":"nonymously-yours","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/2004\/12\/07\/nonymously-yours\/","title":{"rendered":"nonymously yours"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

Two of the most enjoyable weblogs around are the “famous” <\/FONT>Anonymous Lawyer<\/FONT><\/A> and   \"thesaurus\"<\/FONT><\/DIV>
\n
the new <\/FONT>Anonymous Law Professor<\/FONT><\/A>.  What I can’t understand, though, is why such<\/FONT><\/DIV>
\n
creative people can’t use more interesting synonyms for the overused “anonymous.”<\/FONT><\/DIV>
\n
Wouldn’t names like Professor Incognito<\/EM> or the Unsub Lawyer<\/EM> be more fun and helpful?  <\/FONT><\/DIV>
\n
If necessary, try the <\/FONT>Merriam-Webster online <\/FONT><\/FONT>thesaurus<\/FONT><\/A> for starters<\/FONT>, if you’re contemplating <\/FONT><\/DIV>
\n
starting a weblog <\/FONT>with identity undisclosed.<\/FONT><\/DIV>
\n