{"id":4826,"date":"2004-05-10T23:49:22","date_gmt":"2004-05-11T03:49:22","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/formerlyknownas\/2004\/05\/10\/shameless-public-defender-dis"},"modified":"2011-08-05T14:58:47","modified_gmt":"2011-08-05T18:58:47","slug":"shameless-public-defender-disbarred","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/2004\/05\/10\/shameless-public-defender-disbarred\/","title":{"rendered":"Shameless Public Defender Disbarred"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a name='a1471'><\/a><\/p>\n<p><DIV dir=\"ltr\"><SPAN><FONT face=\"Arial\" size=\"2\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/cyber.law.harvard.edu\/blogs\/static\/ethicalesq\/JailBirdneg.jpg\" alt=\"jailbird neg\" \/>&nbsp; We try not to be too preachy&nbsp;these days, but the conduct of Grant County, WA, public defender <STRONG>Thomas J. Earl<\/STRONG> is simply shameful.&nbsp; He was disbarred last week by the Washington State Supreme Court for, among other things,&nbsp;soliciting thousands of dollars each from indigent defendants for work already paid for by the County.&nbsp; (See law.com NewsWire, <A href=\"http:\/\/www.law.com\/jsp\/article.jsp?id=1083979591949&amp;specArtType=newsInBrief\"><FONT face=\"Arial\" size=\"2\">Private Billing Public Defender<\/FONT><\/A><FONT face=\"Arial\" size=\"2\">, 05-11-04)<\/FONT><\/FONT><\/SPAN><\/DIV><br \/>\n<DIV dir=\"ltr\"><SPAN><FONT face=\"Arial\" size=\"2\"><\/FONT><\/SPAN>&nbsp;<\/DIV><br \/>\n<DIV dir=\"ltr\"><SPAN><FONT face=\"Arial\" size=\"2\">As the <A href=\"http:\/\/seattletimes.nwsource.com\/html\/localnews\/2001923295_earl08m.html\"><EM>Seattle Times<\/EM> reported<\/A> on Saturday:<\/FONT><\/SPAN><\/DIV><br \/>\n<BLOCKQUOTE><br \/>\n<DIV dir=\"ltr\"><SPAN><br \/>\n<P><FONT face=\"Arial\" size=\"2\">&#8220;Earl defended thousands of accused felons in 18 years of public-defense work and previously handled or farmed out all court-appointed work in Grant County Superior Court under a $500,000-a-year contract.&nbsp; . . . <\/FONT><br \/>\n<P><FONT face=\"Arial\" size=\"2\">&#8220;By carrying a crushing caseload that eclipsed limits recommended by bar groups, Earl maximized his income while leaving little time for each client. Over the years, his income for public-defense work climbed from $40,000 to $80,000 to six figures. In 2002, he retained about $255,000 after paying other public defenders, The Seattle Times found. &#8220;<\/FONT><\/SPAN><\/P><\/DIV><\/BLOCKQUOTE><br \/>\n<DIV dir=\"ltr\"><SPAN><FONT size=\"+0\"><FONT face=\"Arial\" size=\"2\">Earl handled over 400 felony cases in 2003.&nbsp; The state bar guidelines advise a limit of 150 felonies per year.<\/FONT><\/FONT><\/SPAN><\/DIV><br \/>\n<UL><br \/>\n<LI><br \/>\n<DIV><SPAN><FONT size=\"+0\"><FONT face=\"Arial\" size=\"2\">If it took a <EM>Seattle Times<\/EM> expose&#8217; to get disciplinary action started, the Washington Bar should be ashamed, too.<\/FONT><\/FONT><\/SPAN><\/DIV><\/LI><\/UL><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&nbsp; We try not to be too preachy&nbsp;these days, but the conduct of Grant County, WA, public defender Thomas J. Earl is simply shameful.&nbsp; He was disbarred last week by the Washington State Supreme Court for, among other things,&nbsp;soliciting thousands of dollars each from indigent defendants for work already paid for by the County.&nbsp; (See [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":94,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[2926],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4826","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-pre-06-2006"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p6kP1R-1fQ","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4826","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/94"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4826"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4826\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":13833,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4826\/revisions\/13833"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4826"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4826"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4826"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}