{"id":4667,"date":"2004-01-21T18:31:12","date_gmt":"2004-01-21T22:31:12","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/formerlyknownas\/2004\/01\/21\/those-darn-quotations-marks-a"},"modified":"2011-08-05T15:00:30","modified_gmt":"2011-08-05T19:00:30","slug":"those-darn-quotations-marks-around-the-word-blog","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/2004\/01\/21\/those-darn-quotations-marks-around-the-word-blog\/","title":{"rendered":"Those Darn Quotations Marks Around the Word Blog"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a name='a564'><\/a><\/p>\n<p><P><FONT face=\"Geneva,Arial,Sans-Serif\" size=\"2\"><STRONG>Edward Still<\/STRONG> at <A href=\"http:\/\/www.votelaw.com\/blog\/\">VoteLaw<\/A> has been wondering when the &#8220;mainstream press&#8221; is going to start using the term &#8220;blogs&#8221; without quotation marks.&nbsp; Today, he is <A href=\"http:\/\/www.votelaw.com\/blog\/archives\/001652.html\">pleased<\/A> to see&nbsp;that Dan Froomkin used the word &#8220;bloggers&#8221; in&nbsp;a <EM>Washington Post<\/EM> column&nbsp;&#8211; thus presenting me with the opportunity to leave the following Comment at his site:<\/FONT><\/P><br \/>\n<BLOCKQUOTE><br \/>\n<P><FONT face=\"Geneva,Arial,Sans-Serif\" size=\"2\">If &#8220;blog&#8221; sounded like an actual word, the mainstream media and populace would be far more likely to remove the quotation marks.&nbsp; My guess is that Froomkin is willing to use &#8220;bloggers&#8221; without quotation marks, because it looks and sounds a bit more like something other than onomatopoeic slang for vomiting. <\/FONT><\/P><br \/>\n<P><FONT face=\"Geneva,Arial,Sans-Serif\" size=\"2\">The best way to get the quotation marks removed by the mainstream is for &#8220;webloggers&#8221; or &#8220;webjournalists&#8221; to start using nomenclature that communicates meaning to folks outside the clique. Most of the public and press could live with and understand &#8220;weblogs.&#8221; Why not go back to that more meaningful and less revolting terminology?<\/FONT><\/P><\/BLOCKQUOTE><br \/>\n<P dir=\"ltr\"><FONT face=\"Geneva,Arial,Sans-Serif\" size=\"2\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/cyber.law.harvard.edu\/blogs\/static\/ethicalesq\/mouseartiste.gif\" alt=\"mouse artiste\" \/>&nbsp; This is, of course, a pet peeve of mine. See, <A href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/2003\/10\/01#a307 \">Does Blog Jargon Turn Off Outsiders?<\/A>.&nbsp; Say &#8220;weblog&#8221; or &#8220;web journal&#8221; and you&#8217;ll connect with far more people <EM>and<\/EM> make the world a little less ugly.<\/FONT><\/P><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Edward Still at VoteLaw has been wondering when the &#8220;mainstream press&#8221; is going to start using the term &#8220;blogs&#8221; without quotation marks.&nbsp; Today, he is pleased to see&nbsp;that Dan Froomkin used the word &#8220;bloggers&#8221; in&nbsp;a Washington Post column&nbsp;&#8211; thus presenting me with the opportunity to leave the following Comment at his site: If &#8220;blog&#8221; sounded [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":94,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[2926],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4667","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-pre-06-2006"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p6kP1R-1dh","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4667","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/94"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4667"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4667\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":14040,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4667\/revisions\/14040"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4667"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4667"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4667"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}