{"id":4654,"date":"2004-01-13T22:00:32","date_gmt":"2004-01-14T02:00:32","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/formerlyknownas\/2004\/01\/13\/another-great-reason-for-clie"},"modified":"2011-08-05T15:00:32","modified_gmt":"2011-08-05T19:00:32","slug":"another-great-reason-for-clients-to-negotiate-contingency-fee-level","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/2004\/01\/13\/another-great-reason-for-clients-to-negotiate-contingency-fee-level\/","title":{"rendered":"Another Great Reason for Clients to Negotiate Contingency Fee Levels"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a name='a506'><\/a><\/p>\n<p><DIV><FONT face=\"Arial\" size=\"2\">The <EM>New York Law Journal<\/EM> <A href=\"http:\/\/www.law.com\/jsp\/article.jsp?id=1073944805588\">reports<\/A> that &#8220;<FONT face=\"Verdana\">A taxpayer who won a recovery of backpay and paid his attorneys on a contingency fee basis must include the amount of the contingency payment in his gross income for tax purposes, the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Tuesday.<\/FONT>&#8221;&nbsp;&nbsp; <\/FONT><FONT size=\"2\"><FONT face=\"Verdana\">(NYLJ, &#8220;Contingency Payment Considered Part of Taxpayer&#8217;s Gross Income,&#8221; by Mark Hamblett, 01-14-2004):<\/FONT><\/FONT><\/DIV><br \/>\n<BLOCKQUOTE><br \/>\n<DIV><FONT face=\"Verdana\" size=\"2\"><EM>Judge Wesley said that &#8220;it makes little sense to distinguish between circumstances in which an attorney is paid on a hourly basis and those in which the client and attorney have agreed to a contingent fee arrangement.&#8221; <BR><BR>When a client pays an attorney on an hourly basis, the same fund generates gross income for each; the fund simply passes through the client&#8217;s hands first, he said. &#8220;There seems no reason to treat contingent fee arrangements differently.&#8221; <\/EM><\/FONT><FONT size=\"+0\"><FONT face=\"Verdana\"><\/DIV><\/BLOCKQUOTE><br \/>\n<DIV><FONT face=\"Arial\" size=\"2\">&#8220;piggy broken&#8221;&nbsp; Are p\/i lawyers and others using contingency fees telling their clients about the income tax liability?&nbsp; They certainly should be.&nbsp; &#8216;Nuff said. &nbsp;(<A href=\"http:\/\/appellateblog.blogspot.com\/2004_01_01_appellateblog_archive.html#107402743592029809\">How Appealing noted<\/A>&nbsp; the&nbsp;decision&nbsp;earlier today, and provided a <A href=\"http:\/\/www.ca2.uscourts.gov:81\/isysnative\/RDpcT3BpbnNcT1BOXDAzLTYwMzdfb3BuLnBkZg==\/03-6037_opn.pdf#xml=http:\/\/10.213.23.111:81\/isysquery\/irl4eb6\/2\/hilite\">link<\/A>.)<\/FONT><\/DIV><\/FONT><\/FONT><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The New York Law Journal reports that &#8220;A taxpayer who won a recovery of backpay and paid his attorneys on a contingency fee basis must include the amount of the contingency payment in his gross income for tax purposes, the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Tuesday.&#8221;&nbsp;&nbsp; (NYLJ, &#8220;Contingency Payment Considered Part of Taxpayer&#8217;s [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":94,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[2926],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4654","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-pre-06-2006"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p6kP1R-1d4","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4654","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/94"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4654"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4654\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":14055,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4654\/revisions\/14055"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4654"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4654"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4654"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}