{"id":4629,"date":"2003-12-17T08:57:29","date_gmt":"2003-12-17T12:57:29","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/formerlyknownas\/2003\/12\/17\/stop-blaming-your-lawyers-mr-"},"modified":"2011-08-05T15:00:35","modified_gmt":"2011-08-05T19:00:35","slug":"stop-blaming-your-lawyers-mr-rumsfeld","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/2003\/12\/17\/stop-blaming-your-lawyers-mr-rumsfeld\/","title":{"rendered":"Stop Blaming Your Lawyers, Mr. Rumsfeld"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a name='a391'><\/a><\/p>\n<p><DIV><FONT face=\"Arial\" size=\"2\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/cyber.law.harvard.edu\/blogs\/static\/ethicalesq\/dumptruck.gif\" alt=\"dunptruck\" \/>&nbsp; &#8220;My lawyer won&#8217;t let me&#8221;&nbsp;and &#8220;My lawyer said I could&#8221; are rarely convincing justifications when uttered by Joe Client.&nbsp; They totally fail to ring true when coming from high government officials who have armies of lawyers employed for the primary purpose of providing excuses for political decisions.<\/FONT><\/DIV><br \/>\n<DIV><FONT face=\"Arial\" size=\"2\"><\/FONT>&nbsp;<\/DIV><br \/>\n<DIV><FONT face=\"Arial\" size=\"2\">We don&#8217;t get into politics here at <EM>e&amp;h<\/EM>, but we&#8217;ve been quite annoyed by the frequent suggestions lately&nbsp;by Defense Department Secretary Ronald Rumsfeld that government lawyers will be the ones deciding how Saddam Hussein will be treated.&nbsp; For example, when asked by Lesley Stahl on CBS&#8217;s &#8220;60 Minutes&#8221; on Sunday (12-14-03) whether the Red Cross would be allowed to see Saddam soon, <A href=\"http:\/\/www.cbsnews.com\/stories\/2003\/12\/14\/60minutes\/main588518.shtml\">Mr. Rumsfeld replied<\/A> &#8220;Those are judgments that will be made by the lawyers as we go along.&#8221;&nbsp; <\/FONT><\/DIV><br \/>\n<DIV><FONT face=\"Arial\" size=\"2\"><\/FONT>&nbsp;<\/DIV><br \/>\n<DIV><FONT face=\"Arial\" size=\"2\">The client is the Boss &#8212; especially when the client is Big Government, and even more so when the issue is whether or not to perform or permit a discretionary action.&nbsp;&nbsp; Suggesting here that lawyers will decide on how Saddam is treated (other than by indicating&nbsp;to their client the minimal safeguards and standards of treatment that he must be allowed) makes lawyers and clients look bad.&nbsp;&nbsp;The Client is the&nbsp;Boss and the buck stops with the boss.&nbsp; <\/FONT><\/DIV><br \/>\n<P align=\"center\"><STRONG><FONT face=\"Times New Roman,Times,Serif\" size=\"2\">-e&amp;h thanks-<\/FONT><\/STRONG><\/P><br \/>\n<P align=\"center\"><FONT face=\"Times New Roman\" size=\"2\">to <A href=\"http:\/\/www.ernietheattorney.net\/ernie_the_attorney\/2003\/12\/weekly_law_blog_1.html\">Ernie<\/A> for noting the noteworthiness of this most humble weblog.&nbsp; What could be better than legal ethics and haiku?&nbsp; A daily dose of vitamin Ernie, of course.<\/FONT><\/P><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&nbsp; &#8220;My lawyer won&#8217;t let me&#8221;&nbsp;and &#8220;My lawyer said I could&#8221; are rarely convincing justifications when uttered by Joe Client.&nbsp; They totally fail to ring true when coming from high government officials who have armies of lawyers employed for the primary purpose of providing excuses for political decisions. &nbsp; We don&#8217;t get into politics here [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":94,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[2926],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4629","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-pre-06-2006"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p6kP1R-1cF","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4629","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/94"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4629"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4629\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":14084,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4629\/revisions\/14084"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4629"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4629"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4629"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}