{"id":4611,"date":"2003-10-08T10:43:59","date_gmt":"2003-10-08T14:43:59","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/formerlyknownas\/2003\/10\/08\/first-thing-lets-quell-all-th"},"modified":"2011-08-05T15:00:37","modified_gmt":"2011-08-05T19:00:37","slug":"first-thing-lets-quell-all-the-liars","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/2003\/10\/08\/first-thing-lets-quell-all-the-liars\/","title":{"rendered":"First Thing . . . Let&#8217;s Quell All the Liars"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a title=\"a328\" name=\"a328\"><\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"font-family: Arial\">&#8220;<em>Lawyers, Liars, Bah!<\/em>&#8221;  That&#8217;s what my immigrant, blue-collar Grandpa said, when I told him thirty years ago I&#8217;d be joining my twin brother as a student at Harvard Law School.   Three words, and he never brought up the subject again. <\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: Arial\">Distrust of lawyers is ancient and widespread, and based on much more than class envy or the sour grapes of a dissatisfied client.  From Sir Thomas More&#8217;s &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikisource.org\/wiki\/Utopia\/Chapter_7\">Utopia<\/a>&#8220;, to Walter Olson&#8217;s <\/span><span style=\"font-family: Arial\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.overlawyered.com\/\">Overlawyered.com<\/a><\/span><span style=\"font-family: Arial\">, and from <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bartleby.com\/66\/98\/50798.html\">Shakespeare<\/a> to <a href=\"http:\/\/www.zazzle.com\/lawyer_dark_mug-168662027945625733\">Shark Mugs<\/a> (and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.zazzle.com\/shark_my_lawyer_can_beat_up_your_lawyer_tshirt-235158488485159707\">t-shirts<\/a>), <\/span><span style=\"font-family: Arial\">lawyers have been universally disrespected, even by (and sometimes especially by) those who know them the best and need them the most. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: Arial\">Why?  Put simply, human beings find it difficult to trust or respect liars &#8212; especially the dissembler who promises protection, disguises motives or parses words.  Like it or not, to the average person, lawyers seem to be in the <em>business of lying<\/em>, their degree being a license to lie &#8212; and steal.  [You&#8217;ll find some all-too-representative quotations and jokes in<\/span> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/Poetic-Justice-Funniest-Meanest-Lawyers\/dp\/0873370724\"><em>Poetic   Justice<\/em><\/a> (edited by Jonathan and Andrew Roth, Nolo Press,  1994) <span style=\"font-family: Arial\">and by clicking on a few results from a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.google.com\/search?hl=en&amp;safe=active&amp;client=firefox-a&amp;hs=iAV&amp;rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&amp;channel=s&amp;q=%22lawyer+jokes%22&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=g10&amp;aql=&amp;oq=&amp;gs_rfai=\">&#8220;lawyer joke&#8221; Google search<\/a>.<\/span><span style=\"font-family: Arial\">] <\/span><span style=\"font-family: Arial\">The causes go far beyond the central role lawyers play in our &#8220;adversarial&#8221; legal system, although that doesn&#8217;t help (&#8220;You see, my dear, both sides present slanted stories and the judge nevertheless figures out what the truth is and renders justice.&#8221;) <\/span><br \/>\n<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone\" title=\"Kill all the Lawyers coffee mug\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/files\/2008\/08\/41arkidei-l_sl500_aa240_.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"52\" height=\"60\" \/> <span style=\"font-family: Arial\">Before the existence of the modern media, the public learned about their local lawyers at the public market, through neighborly gossip, and eventually from newspaper accounts.  There were relatively few attorneys in most communities, and the personal reputation of each lawyer could stand on its own.  Now, Americans and other members of the westernized world mostly see lawyers at work on their television screens, and the picture isn&#8217;t pretty.   It&#8217;s not hard to understand the public&#8217;s disrespect for the profession, when its main images are:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><span style=\"font-family: Arial\">criminal defense lawyers spouting sound bites on courthouse steps, the content of which often strains credulity, blames victims, and has very little to do with the important role of making the government prove its case; <\/span><\/li>\n<li><span style=\"font-family: Arial\">ceaseless tidal waves of personal injury ads, with lawyers promising to be your best friend and to fight selflessly to get you every penny you deserve &#8212; when, in fact, they will not lift a finger for you unless you sign over a third or 40% of <em>your<\/em> claim, no matter how little work or risk is involved for their firm; <\/span><\/li>\n<li><span style=\"font-family: Arial\">heroine and hero lawyers in popular tv shows and movies who have very little problem using deception and ignoring ethical obligations<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: Arial\">Except for real estate closings, the most likely significant personal contact with a lawyer for the average American often comes in the context of a divorce or custody fight &#8212; either their own or that of a close friend.   In that setting, lawyers consistently make claims about the opposing client that are willful distortions of the truth, used for posturing or leverage.   In pleadings and during negotiations, for example, baseless or trumped-up charges of parental unfitness and spousal cruelty are routinely made, and frequently considered to be skillful lawyering.  The resulting scars <\/span><span style=\"font-family: Arial\">and resentment of lawyers tend to last a lifetime.<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"font-family: Arial\"> <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: Arial\">. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: Arial\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone\" title=\"coffee mug saying Kill All the Lawyers\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/files\/2008\/04\/41arkidei-l_sl500_aa240_.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"57\" height=\"66\" \/> A major study released last year for the ABA Section of Litigation on &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.abanet.org\/litigation\/lawyers\/\">Public Perceptions of Lawyers<\/a>&#8220;<\/span><span style=\"font-family: Arial\"> (June 2002) merely confirmed the public&#8217;s lack of confidence in the profession.   Instead of getting to the root of the problem, the organized bar <span style=\"font-family: Arial\">combats millennia of ill will and bad press with canned speeches and a barrel of &#8220;mugs, magnets, t-shirts, hats, mousepads, buttons, stickers &amp; more&#8221; straight from the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.abanet.org\/publiced\/lawday\/ldstore.html\">Law Day Store<\/a>. <\/span><span style=\"font-family: Arial\"> The profession acts <strong>as if it only has an image problem<\/strong> and not a fundamental crisis. <\/span><\/span><br \/>\n.<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: Arial\">Therefore, whenever bar leaders are published on the op\/ed pages of the media, or quoted on the news pages, we only hear that the profession holds itself to &#8220;the highest ethical standards,&#8221; and is working hard to improve its civility and protect its clients (when, in fact, it is usually protecting clients &#8212; and therefore lawyers &#8212; from competition and choice).   Their detractors are painted as opportunists with political or economic agendas.   And, lawyer jokes are depicted as the cause rather than the result of the public&#8217;s distrust. <\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><span style=\"font-family: Arial\">My message to the legal profession:  <strong>You <em>do<\/em> need more PR, but it must be Professional Responsibility, not Public Relations<\/strong>.   Image crafting only sounds like more deception to the average (and above-average) American.  Like more lies.   Lost trust has to be earned the hard way &#8212; client by client, case by case, with the focus on competence, diligence, and loyalty toward the client; on responsibility toward society rather than toward guild and gelt; on vigorous overseeing rather than overlooking of ethical rules; and on service rather than self-importance. <\/span><\/li>\n<li><span style=\"font-family: Arial\">Legal consumers can&#8217;t merely be <em>told<\/em> that the client comes first.  They have to see it and feel it.  Until then, the equation &#8220;lawyer = liar&#8221; will remain a truism in the mind of the common man, not just a humorous pun. <\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: Arial\"><strong><em><span style=\"color: darkblue\"><span style=\"color: red\">Doing Right by Shakespeare:<\/span> <\/span><\/em><\/strong>Before I sign off, please allow me to sound-off about a particularly dastardly example of lawyer disinformation &#8212; the party line propaganda used to combat the ubiquitous quotation from Shakespeare, which I paraphrased in the headline above, and set forth here:<\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>&#8220;<strong>First thing we do, let&#8217;s kill all the lawyers.<\/strong>&#8221;<br \/>\n<em><span style=\"font-family: Arial\"><strong> <\/strong>&#8211;Shakespeare, King Henry VI, Part II, IV, ii<strong> <\/strong><\/span><\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p dir=\"ltr\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial\">The classiest response by the Bar to those nine little words by the Bard, would be to ignore them and merely smile at all the notepads, t-shirts, bumper stickers, and baseball caps upon which they appear.   Another dignified option would be making a professional, non-defensive response; s<\/span><span style=\"font-family: Arial\">omething like:  &#8220;Hey, it&#8217;s just one line from a 400-year-old play.  No one can say whether a particular character is echoing an author&#8217;s beliefs.  Even though Shakespeare often uses his comedic characters to make barbs at society&#8217;s ills and injustices, we can&#8217;t know if that was his purpose here.  Shakespeare was an entertainer and many of the rabble in the audience almost certainly enjoyed hearing such populist sentiments.&#8221;<\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-family: Arial\"><br \/>\n<\/span><span style=\"font-family: Arial\"> <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: Arial\"><br \/>\n<\/span><span style=\"font-family: Arial\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial\">However, instead of taking such a reasonable approach, the Bar has decided to put down its lawyers license and engage in artistic license and fiction writing.   In the name of setting the record straight, they have decided to <strong>misinform the public about the meaning and context of Shakespeare&#8217;s famous line<\/strong>.  The party line is, therefore, that the sentence demonstrates Shakespeare&#8217;s unshakable recognition of the important role lawyers play in maintaining the rule of law and the fruits of civilization.   The phrase is [the lawyers insist] a <em>tribute to lawyers<\/em>.  See, for example the assertions <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scu.edu\/law\/FacWebPage\/Peterson\/Links\/shakespeare\/shakespeare.html\">here<\/a>, <\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-family: Arial\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial\"><a href=\"http:\/\/firms.findlaw.com\/UWLAlawreview\/memo21.htm\">here<\/a>, and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.jfrlaw.com\/shake.htm\">here<\/a>.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: Arial\"> <\/span><\/p>\n<p dir=\"ltr\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial\">As attorney and mediator Linda C. Fritz, Esq., <a href=\"http:\/\/www.conflictresolution.com\/\">declares<\/a>, quoting an ABA President: <\/span><span style=\"font-family: Arial\"> <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: Arial\"> <\/span><\/p>\n<p dir=\"ltr\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial\"><strong><span style=\"font-family: Arial;color: black\"><em>The truth about &#8220;Let&#8217;s kill all the lawyers&#8221;!<\/em><\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"font-family: Arial\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial\">&#8220;Service to others is a worthy goal for an aspiring professional and the best response all lawyers can make to our critics.  We might also urge the bashers to read their Shakespeare more carefully.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: Arial\"> <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: Arial\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial\">The words, &#8216;Let&#8217;s kill all the lawyers,&#8217; were not spoken by a disgruntled litigant (or even by Henry VI&#8217;s press secretary). They were uttered by the conspirators in <em>Cade&#8217;s Rebellion,<strong> <\/strong><\/em>who<strong><em> <\/em><\/strong>planned to overthrow the English government, destroy the ancient rights of English men and women, [<em>as such &#8220;rights&#8221; were available to women at that time<\/em>], and establish a virtual dictatorship.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: Arial\"> <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: Arial\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial\">Through the rebels&#8217; threat, Shakespeare reminds the groundlings that lawyers, as protectors of that system of ordered liberty, are as much an obstacle to a rebellion that would curtail liberty as any garrisoned castle.  Thus, Cade&#8217;s<strong> <\/strong>path to oppression leads inevitably over their bodies&#8230;&#8221;. &#8212; <em>J<\/em>o<em>hn J. Curtin, Jr., Esq., President, American Bar Association, published in the ABA Journal, September, 1990.<\/em><\/span><\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: Arial\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial\">No less a luminary that the venerable <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.fetzer.org\/programs\/prog_Dlink.htm\">Dean David T. Link<\/a><\/strong> makes the same argument:<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"font-family: Arial\">In fact, <strong>the famous quote from Shakespeare is not a criticism of lawyers, but actually is the greatest possible compliment<\/strong>. The scene from &#8220;Henry VI&#8221; (Part II) concerns the planning of an evil revolution&#8211;a takeover of power by Cades and his companion, Dick the Butcher, for their own greedy purposes. Dick the Butcher, recognizing the one group of people that might save the citizenries&#8217; property and rights, says: &#8220;The first thing we do, let&#8217;s kill all the lawyers.&#8221; The lawyers, in other words, were the potential enemies of the despots.<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: Arial\"> <\/span><\/p>\n<p dir=\"ltr\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial\">This propaganda has been repeated so often that even an astute observer and skeptic like <em>St. Petersburg Times<\/em> columnist Howard Troxler, has <a href=\"http:\/\/www.sptimes.com\/2002\/07\/10\/Columns\/Don_t_kill_the_lawyer.shtml\">accepted it<\/a> <\/span><span style=\"font-family: Arial\">(&#8220;Don&#8217;t kill the lawyers, just the frivolous lawsuits,&#8221; July 10 2002):<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"font-family: Arial\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial\">Lastly, for the record, so lawyers will quit accusing me of being ignorant, I am perfectly aware of the context of the original &#8220;kill the lawyers&#8221; quote. It comes from Shakespeare (2 Henry VI, Act IV, Scene 2), in which there is a conspiracy to establish a dictatorship. <\/span><br \/>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: Arial\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial\">The plotters are boasting about how they will make everybody bow down to them. That is when one of the conspirators chimes in, &#8220;The first thing we do, let&#8217;s kill all the lawyers.&#8221; His goal was to destroy the law, so that the citizens would have no legal protection. I admit this freely. You will notice, however, that Shakespeare was silent on the question of a less drastic reform. <\/span><\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: Arial\"><strong>There&#8217;s one problem, neither the play itself nor English history support the legal profession&#8217;s interpretation of Shakespeare<\/strong>.   First, the conversation between Jack Cade and Dick the Butcher is <em>not<\/em> a discussion on how to plot to win a rebellion against lawful government.  Quite the opposite, Cade is proclaiming what he will do &#8220;when I am king, &#8212; as king I will be.&#8221;   When Butcher yells out that the first thing he wants done is to kill all the lawyers, Cade responds, &#8220;Nay, that I mean to do,&#8221; and laments &#8220;I was never mine own man&#8221; since signing a contract [&#8220;scribbled&#8221; on parchment by a lawyer and sealed with bee&#8217;s wax].  The full conversation that contains the line can be read <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/stories\/storyReader$332\">here<\/a>.<\/span><span style=\"font-family: Arial\"><br \/>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<p dir=\"ltr\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial\"> <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: Arial\"><br \/>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<p dir=\"ltr\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial\">This rings true, from a historical perspective, as a proposal to kill all lawyers was a central feature of the earlier rebellion led by Wat Tyler in 1381, and Shakespeare (never a strict historian) appears to meld the Tyler and Cade uprisings together.   As one <a href=\"http:\/\/www.swuklink.com\/BAAAGDDS.php\">source<\/a> has explained, lawyers were targeted in Tyler&#8217;s Peasants Revolt, because they &#8220;enabled landlords to force many labourers to return to the old conditions by finding faults in deeds of manumission &#8221;  [That is, peasants who had been freed from servitude or serfdom by their masters were returned to bondage, when lawyers found loopholes in the documents that had purportedly freed them.] <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: Arial\"> <\/span><\/p>\n<p dir=\"ltr\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial\"> <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: Arial\"><br \/>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<p dir=\"ltr\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial\">The English do not view Cade and Tyler as mere riff-raff in revolt against a benign government, as the lawyer propagandists insist.  <span style=\"font-family: Arial\">Here&#8217;s a description of the Cade Rebellion on the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bbc.co.uk\/dna\/h2g2\/A791101\">bbc<\/a> website:<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"font-family: Arial\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial;color: black;font-size: x-small\"><strong>Jack Cade&#8217;s rebellion<\/strong><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: Arial\"> <\/span><span style=\"font-family: Arial\"><span style=\"font-size: x-small\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial\">Henry VI was an <strong>unpopular king<\/strong>, who imposed crippling taxes resulting in poverty for the people, whilst being <strong>accused of extravagant living and corruption in his own court<\/strong>.  John Mortimer, an Irishman living in Kent and calling himself Jack Cade, led <strong>a rebellion to protest about laws, taxes and extortion of food and goods which kept them poor<\/strong>. The rebels wanted justice and claimed that the King was not keeping to the solemn oaths he had sworn to abide by. One demand was that Richard Plantagenet, the Duke of York, (whom Cade claimed as a Mortimer cousin) should be recalled from exile in Ireland<\/span><span style=\"font-family: Arial\"> and made King instead. <\/span><span style=\"font-family: Arial\">Unusually, Cade&#8217;s followers were not only peasants but also landowners and gentry. <\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: Arial\"> <\/span><\/p>\n<p dir=\"ltr\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial\"><span style=\"font-size: x-small\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial\">Similarly, here is the History of the Peasants&#8217; Revolt found at <a href=\"http:\/\/www.britannia.com\/history\/articles\/peasantsrevolt.html\">Britannia.com<\/a> <\/span><span style=\"font-family: Arial;color: #000000\">(written by Jeff Hobbs):<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"font-family: Arial\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial;font-size: x-small\">The targets that the peasants attacked, plus the demands that they made to the King, show the pressures they faced at the time. The immediate cause of the revolt was the <strong>unprecedented amount of taxation the peasantry faced <\/strong>from the Government. The poll tax of 1380 was three times higher than that of the previous year and, unlike its predecessor, taxed rich and poor at the same rate. Hence, it was very unpopular with the peasantry. <\/span><br \/>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: Arial\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial;font-size: x-small\">However,<strong> the main call of the peasant rebels was for the abolition of serfdom<\/strong>. This was because, since the middle of the century, their lords had prevented them from making the most of the changing economic conditions. Visitations of the plague since 1348\/9 had reduced the population by between a third and a half. As a result, labour became more scarce, wages rose and the economy began to suit the peasant more than it suited the landowner. However, the landowners of Parliament legislated to keep wages low and to restrict the free movement of serfs. <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: Arial\"> <\/span><\/p>\n<p dir=\"ltr\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial\"><span style=\"font-size: x-small\">[For additional discussion of Cade&#8217;s Rebellion, click <\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/www.britainexpress.com\/History\/medieval\/cade.htm\"><span style=\"font-size: x-small\">here<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-size: x-small\"> <\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-family: Arial\"><span style=\"font-size: x-small\">and <\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/www.encyclopedia.com\/html\/C\/Cade-J1ac.asp\"><span style=\"font-size: x-small\">here<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-size: x-small\">.] <\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: Arial\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial\"> <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p dir=\"ltr\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial\"><span style=\"font-size: x-small\">That&#8217;s the <em>unlawyered version<\/em> of the story.  In this historic context, lawyers were seen as protecting the privileged and corrupt establishment, as part of the resistance to needed social change and justice.  Whatever William Shakespeare actually felt about the legal profession, a good part of his audience would have enjoyed hearing Dick the Butcher&#8217;s idea for improving society once their rebellion was successful.  The royal &#8220;we&#8221; here at <em>ethicalEsq?<\/em> are not advocating slaughtering all the lawyers &#8212; just stifling all the liars.<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: Arial\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial\"> <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p dir=\"ltr\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial\"><span style=\"font-family: Times New Roman,Times,Serif;font-size: x-small\"> <\/span> <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: Arial\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial\"><br \/>\n<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p dir=\"ltr\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial\"><span style=\"font-family: Times New Roman,Times,Serif;font-size: x-small\"><strong><em>ethicalEsq &#8211; ethicalEsq<\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: Arial\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial\"> <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p dir=\"ltr\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial\"><strong><em> <\/em><\/strong> <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: Arial\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial\"><br \/>\n<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p dir=\"ltr\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial\"><span style=\"font-family: Times New Roman,Times,Serif;font-size: x-small\"><strong>Thanks<\/strong>:<strong> <\/strong>to<strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.denniskennedy.com\/\">Dennis Kennedy<\/a> <\/strong>for pointing over to this posting and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.denniskennedy.com\/archives\/cat_legal_profession.html#000207\">adding<\/a> his own reflections at his weblog, as did our D&amp;E Man, George Wallace, under the guise of <em><a href=\"http:\/\/foolintheforest.blogspot.com\/\">A Fool in the Forest<\/a><\/em>.  Und, vielen dank to <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ernietheattorney.net\/ernie_the_attorney\/2003\/10\/lying_lawyers_h.html\"><strong>Ernie<\/strong><\/a> for directing his throng over here (and pointing that loaded gun in another direction), to Harvey Morrell at <a href=\"http:\/\/ubaltlawlibrary.blogspot.com\/\">UBalt.LawLibraryBlog<\/a>, our friends at the <a href=\"http:\/\/temp.starklawlibrary.org\/blog\/\">Stark County Library Blawg<\/a>, and the tres vague proprietor of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.makeoutcity.com\/\">makeoutcity.com<\/a>, too.   Also, m<span style=\"font-family: Times New Roman,Times,Serif;font-size: x-small\"><span style=\"font-family: Times New Roman,Times,Serif;font-size: x-small\"><em><strong>any thanks to <\/strong><\/em><a href=\"http:\/\/noble.cbnoble.com\/\"><em><strong>The Noble Pundit<\/strong><\/em><\/a><\/span><span style=\"font-size: small\"><span style=\"font-family: Times New Roman,Times,Serif\"><em><strong> <\/strong><\/em><span style=\"font-size: x-small\">for<em><strong> <\/strong><\/em><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size: small\"><span style=\"font-family: Times New Roman,Times,Serif\"><span style=\"font-size: x-small\">including this posting <\/span><\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size: small\"><span style=\"font-family: Times New Roman,Times,Serif\"><span style=\"font-size: x-small\">in <a href=\"http:\/\/www.elhide.com\/solo\/cotc.htm\">Carnival of the Capitalists<\/a> #3 (October 26, 2003).<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: Arial\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial\"> <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p dir=\"ltr\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial\"> <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: Arial\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial\"><br \/>\n<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p dir=\"ltr\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial\"><span style=\"font-family: Times New Roman;font-size: x-small\"><strong><span style=\"color: red\"><em>update<\/em><\/span> <\/strong>(Oct. 30, 2004):  As mentioned <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/newsItems\/trackback\/ping$2622\">here<\/a>, the <a href=\"http:\/\/seattlepi.nwsource.com\/national\/apelection_story.asp?category=1131&amp;slug=Legal%20Hot%20Spots\"><span style=\"color: black\">swarm of lawyers<\/span><\/a> around the 2004 Presidential Election<\/span><\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-family: Arial\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial\"><span style=\"font-family: Times New Roman;font-size: x-small\"> will almost surely reduce the profession&#8217;s popularity even more.  Is the Bar prepared to tell<\/span><\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-family: Arial\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial\"><span style=\"font-family: Times New Roman;font-size: x-small\"> the public why\/if\/when the election role is appropriate?<\/span><\/span><\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"font-family: Arial\"> <\/span><\/p>\n<p dir=\"ltr\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial\"> <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: Arial\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial\"><br \/>\n<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p dir=\"ltr\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial\"><span style=\"font-family: Times New Roman,Times,Serif\"><span style=\"font-size: x-small\"><strong><em><span style=\"color: #ff0000\">update<\/span><\/em><\/strong> (Nov. 7, 2004): A thoughtful &#8220;middle&#8221; position on just what Shakespeare meant is offered by Kory Swanson, Vice President, <\/span><\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/www.johnlocke.org\/about\/\"><span style=\"font-family: Times New Roman,Times,Serif;color: black;font-size: x-small\">John Locke Foundation<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-family: Times New Roman,Times,Serif;font-size: x-small\">, and discussed in <\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/www.carolinajournal.com\/issues\/display_story.html?id=962\"><span style=\"font-family: Times New Roman,Times,Serif\"><span style=\"font-size: x-small\">&#8220;<em>Let&#8217;s Kill All the Lawyers&#8221; and Other Insights from the Bard<\/em><\/span><\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-family: Times New Roman,Times,Serif\"><span style=\"font-size: x-small\"><em>: Shakespeare&#8217;s multi-layered commentary on the law,<\/em> by <\/span><\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/www.carolinajournal.com\/cjcolumnists\/display_author.html?id=72\"><span style=\"font-family: Times New Roman,Times,Serif;color: #000000;font-size: x-small\">Teresa Nichols<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-family: Times New Roman,Times,Serif;font-size: x-small\"> (<em>Carolina Journal Online<\/em>, July 31, 2003).  According to Nichols, Swanson concludes &#8220;Shakespeare truly intended the phrase to be a portrayal of corrupt lawyers and the laws they pervert as the true enemies to sound government, justice, and freedom.&#8221;  Also, see our <\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/2004\/11\/07#a2674\"><span style=\"font-family: Times New Roman,Times,Serif;color: red;font-size: x-small\">post<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-family: Times New Roman,Times,Serif;font-size: x-small\"> on Nov. 7, 2004, describing a rather sorry &#8220;defense of Shakespeare&#8221; and an indy film from 1992 called <em>Let&#8217;s Kill All the Lawyers<\/em>.<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&#8220;Lawyers, Liars, Bah!&#8221; That&#8217;s what my immigrant, blue-collar Grandpa said, when I told him thirty years ago I&#8217;d be joining my twin brother as a student at Harvard Law School. Three words, and he never brought up the subject again. Distrust of lawyers is ancient and widespread, and based on much more than class envy [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":94,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[2926],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4611","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-pre-06-2006"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p6kP1R-1cn","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4611","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/94"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4611"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4611\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11202,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4611\/revisions\/11202"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4611"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4611"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4611"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}