{"id":4600,"date":"2003-09-30T10:31:47","date_gmt":"2003-09-30T14:31:47","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/formerlyknownas\/2003\/09\/30\/uk-lawyers-get-new-discipline"},"modified":"2011-08-05T15:00:38","modified_gmt":"2011-08-05T19:00:38","slug":"uk-lawyers-get-new-discipline-system","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/2003\/09\/30\/uk-lawyers-get-new-discipline-system\/","title":{"rendered":"UK Lawyers Get New Discipline System"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a name='a305'><\/a><\/p>\n<p><DIV><FONT face=\"Arial\">Acting with a swiftness impossible in the multi-jurisdictional (and pro-lawyer) American legal discipline system, the British Lord Chancellor has announced&nbsp;the&nbsp;establishment of a new Commissioner for legal services complaints, stripping the Law Society of England and Wales of its ancient right to regulate the profession.&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/FONT><\/DIV><br \/>\n<DIV><FONT face=\"Arial\"><\/FONT><FONT face=\"Arial\"><\/FONT>&nbsp;<\/DIV><br \/>\n<DIV><FONT face=\"Arial\">According to an <A href=\"http:\/\/www.guardian.co.uk\/uk_news\/story\/0,3604,1050654,00.html\">article<\/A> in&nbsp;<EM>The Guardian&nbsp;<\/EM><\/FONT><FONT face=\"Arial\"><EM>&nbsp;<\/EM>(&#8220;Threat of huge fines on Law Society,&#8221; by Clare Dyer, Sept. 27, 2003, via law.com&#8217;s <A href=\"http:\/\/www.law.com\/newswire\/\">Daily Legal NewsWire<\/A><\/FONT><FONT face=\"Arial\">), the commissioner&#8217;s role will be to scrutinize the Law Society&#8217;s overall complaints-handling process, impose targets on the Society, and even fine it if it fails to meet them.&nbsp;&nbsp; An Ombudsman&#8217;s Office will continue to be concerned with how well the Society responds to individual complaints. <\/FONT><\/DIV><br \/>\n<DIV><br \/>\n<DIV><br \/>\n<BLOCKQUOTE><br \/>\n<P><FONT face=\"Arial\">Lord Falconer, the UK Lord Chancelor is quoted in the <EM>Guardian&nbsp;<\/EM>explaining that: &#8220;The process by which complaints are dealt with has not commanded public confidence over the years. It is a significant problem.&#8221;&nbsp;&nbsp; The article continues: &#8220;He described a culture in firms of not trying to satisfy a complainant but trying to &#8216;knock out a complaint by a detailed analysis of the facts&#8217;, or regarding a complainant as &#8216;someone who doesn&#8217;t quite understand the process, and therefore must be wrong&#8217;.&#8221;<\/FONT> <\/P><\/BLOCKQUOTE><br \/>\n<P><FONT face=\"Arial\">The impending reforms in the UK were discussed at length, along with comparisons of many issues&nbsp;impacting client services and legal discipline in the USA and UK,&nbsp;in&nbsp;our posting <A href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/2003\/08\/04#a168\">here<\/A> on Aug. 4, 2003.<FONT face=\"Arial\">]&nbsp; <\/FONT>We&#8217;ve wondered before, and have to ask again:&nbsp; When&nbsp;will those with the power to affect change (<EM>e.g.<\/EM>, judges, bar leaders, politicians) champion such reforms&nbsp;for the American system, on behalf of the American consumer of legal services?&nbsp; <\/FONT><\/P><\/DIV><\/DIV><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Acting with a swiftness impossible in the multi-jurisdictional (and pro-lawyer) American legal discipline system, the British Lord Chancellor has announced&nbsp;the&nbsp;establishment of a new Commissioner for legal services complaints, stripping the Law Society of England and Wales of its ancient right to regulate the profession.&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; According to an article in&nbsp;The Guardian&nbsp;&nbsp;(&#8220;Threat of huge fines on [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":94,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[2926],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4600","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-pre-06-2006"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p6kP1R-1cc","jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4600","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/94"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4600"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4600\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":14117,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4600\/revisions\/14117"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4600"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4600"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4600"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}