{"id":4557,"date":"2003-08-19T23:57:01","date_gmt":"2003-08-20T03:57:01","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/formerlyknownas\/2003\/08\/19\/governors-pay-promise-ends-bo"},"modified":"2011-08-05T15:00:44","modified_gmt":"2011-08-05T19:00:44","slug":"governors-pay-promise-ends-boston-lawyer-boycott","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/2003\/08\/19\/governors-pay-promise-ends-boston-lawyer-boycott\/","title":{"rendered":"Governor&#8217;s Pay Promise Ends Boston Lawyer Boycott"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a name='a202'><\/a><\/p>\n<p><DIV><FONT face=\"Arial\"><br \/>\n<DIV><FONT face=\"Arial\" color=\"green\"><STRONG>Update II:&nbsp;<\/STRONG><FONT color=\"black\">&nbsp;Massachusetts Governor Mitt <U>Romney announced<\/U> through a <A href=\"http:\/\/www.bristolcpcs.org\/Gov20030819.PDF\">press release<\/A> today that <U>he would sign<\/U> supplemental budget legislation to assure that assigned counsel are paid for work performed in Fiscal Year 2003.&nbsp;&nbsp; Romney said that the prospect of state criminal court sessions grinding to a halt is a public safety issue and he expected assigned counsel to &#8220;get back to work immediately to assure the administration of justice.&#8221;<\/FONT><\/FONT><\/DIV><br \/>\n<DIV><FONT face=\"Arial\"><\/FONT>&nbsp;<\/DIV><br \/>\n<DIV><FONT face=\"Arial\">In response to Romney&#8217;s promise, <U>Suffolk Lawyers for Justice<\/U>, which called for the boycott of new cases last Thursday, <A href=\"http:\/\/www.bristolcpcs.org\/SLJ20030819.PDF\">announced<\/A> it would <U>begin assigning lawyers to cases<\/U> in Suffolk County criminal matters; that it was &#8220;<U>pleased with the prompt action<\/U> taken by both the Legislature and the Governnor;&#8221; and that &#8220;it <U>took tremendous courage on the part of individual attorneys<\/U> to decline cases and take a stand on an issue that is crucial to the adequate representation of the indigent.&#8221;<\/FONT><\/DIV><br \/>\n<DIV><FONT face=\"Arial\"><\/FONT>&nbsp;<\/DIV><br \/>\n<DIV><FONT face=\"Arial\"><EM>The Boston Herald <\/EM>online, posted an Associated Press <A>dispatch<\/A> this afternoon, stating that &#8220;The 335-member Suffolk group ended its day-and-a-half protest at 2 p.m. after Romney said the $15.4 million would not be vetoed from the bill when he signs it.&#8221;<\/FONT><\/DIV><\/FONT><\/DIV><br \/>\n<DIV><FONT face=\"Arial\"><\/FONT>&nbsp;<\/DIV><br \/>\n<UL><br \/>\n<LI><FONT face=\"Arial\">Your Editor is pleased that further damage to the judicial process is avoided.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Howerver, the <U>coercive tactics<\/U> used by the Bay State bar advocates were <U>unjustified and unethical<\/U>, and took far less courage when done as part of a conspiracy than if each lawyer had indeed made an individual decision.&nbsp;&nbsp; Let&#8217;s hope that this quick success does not motivate the assigned counsel to try another group boycott &#8212; or implicit threat of such &#8212; to get its primary goal of significantly raised fees.&nbsp;&nbsp; Raising the fees is a worthwhile goal, but <U>the means used by officers of the court need to be lawful and ethical from now on<\/U>.<\/FONT><\/LI><\/UL><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Update II:&nbsp;&nbsp;Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney announced through a press release today that he would sign supplemental budget legislation to assure that assigned counsel are paid for work performed in Fiscal Year 2003.&nbsp;&nbsp; Romney said that the prospect of state criminal court sessions grinding to a halt is a public safety issue and he expected assigned [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":94,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[2926],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4557","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-pre-06-2006"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p6kP1R-1bv","jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4557","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/94"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4557"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4557\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":14174,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4557\/revisions\/14174"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4557"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4557"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4557"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}