{"id":4532,"date":"2003-07-31T10:13:37","date_gmt":"2003-07-31T14:13:37","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/formerlyknownas\/2003\/07\/31\/lawyer-for-clergy-sex-abuse-v"},"modified":"2011-08-05T15:00:47","modified_gmt":"2011-08-05T19:00:47","slug":"lawyer-for-clergy-sex-abuse-victims-takes-ethics-complaint-by-dioce","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/2003\/07\/31\/lawyer-for-clergy-sex-abuse-victims-takes-ethics-complaint-by-dioce\/","title":{"rendered":"Lawyer for Clergy Sex Abuse Victims Takes Ethics Complaint by Diocese Public"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a name='a158'><\/a><\/p>\n<p><FONT face=\"Arial\" color=\"#000000\"><br \/>\n<P>&#8220;High-profile&#8221; New York lawyer John Aretakis uses the press as an integral part of his many lawsuits on behalf of victims of clergy sexual abuse.&nbsp; According to the New York Law Journal, he&#8217;s decided to go public with his fight against resulting ethics complaints, which he says are used by Albany&#8217;s Catholic Diocese to stifle his legal advocacy on behalf of his clients.<\/P><br \/>\n<P>In the <EM>NYLJ <\/EM>article, captioned <\/FONT><FONT face=\"Arial\"><A href=\"http:\/\/www.law.com\/jsp\/article.jsp?id=1058416463440\">Lawyer and Diocese Wage Ethics Battle in Public<\/A>, reporter John Caher (07-31-2003) writes:<\/FONT><FONT face=\"Arial\" color=\"#000000\"> &#8220;<\/FONT><FONT face=\"Arial\">An <U>attorney&#8217;s right or obligation to publicly advocate for his clients<\/U>, and to make protected allegations within the confines of a lawsuit, is in sharp focus in an ethics complaint lodged against a plaintiffs&#8217; lawyer at the center of the clergy abuse scandal rocking the Roman Catholic Diocese of Albany, N.Y.&#8221;&nbsp; (emphasis added)<\/P><\/FONT><FONT face=\"Arial\" color=\"#000000\"><br \/>\n<P>The NYLJ article continues:<\/P><\/FONT><FONT face=\"Arial\"><br \/>\n<BLOCKQUOTE><br \/>\n<P>Aretakis, who was representing alleged victims of clergy abuse years before the national church scandal broke, is a particularly aggressive and media-savvy advocate who has used publicity and the threat of it in demanding settlements. <\/P><br \/>\n<P>Church officials have repeatedly questioned Aretakis&#8217; professional ethics, while Aretakis, a solo practitioner, has repeatedly suggested that the diocese and Bishop Howard J. Hubbard are attempting to stifle litigation by stifling the litigator. <\/P><\/BLOCKQUOTE><\/FONT><FONT face=\"Arial\" color=\"#000000\"><\/FONT><FONT face=\"Arial\"><br \/>\n<P>The ethics complaint at issue here was filed by Sister Anne Bryan Smollin, a defendant in a lawsuit filed by Aretakis.&nbsp; Sister Smollin takes issue with questions raised by Aretakis about her qualifications and impartiality counseling clergy abuse victims.&nbsp; In addition, she points to Aretakis as the source of untrue allegations about her personal life.<\/P><br \/>\n<P>The story is also covered in today&#8217;s <EM><A href=\"http:\/\/www.timesunion.com\/AspStories\/story.asp?storyID=156428&amp;category=REGION&amp;newsdate=7\/31\/2003 \">Albany Times Union<\/A><\/EM> <\/FONT><FONT face=\"Arial\" color=\"#000000\">(&#8220;<\/FONT><FONT face=\"Arial\">Lawyer in church abuse cases faces complaints&#8221;, by Andrew Tilghman, 7\/31\/03), and various aspects of Artekasis&#8217; battle against the Diocese have received much <A href=\"http:\/\/www.wten.com\/Global\/SearchResults.asp?qu=Aretakis \">local tv coverage<\/A>. <\/FONT><FONT face=\"Arial\" color=\"#000000\">In one recent story, Curtis Oathout, a primary plaintiff in an Aretakis sex abuse case, was granted his request to hire a new lawyer, after he cited &#8220;irreconcilable differences&#8221; with Aretakis, due to the lawyer&#8217;s <\/FONT><FONT face=\"Arial\">&#8220;<U>unacceptable actions<\/U>&#8221; in his lawsuit against the diocese. (<A href=\"http:\/\/www.wten.com\/Global\/story.asp?s=%20%201329121 \">WTEN news report<\/A>, <\/FONT><FONT face=\"Arial\">posted June 19, 2003.<\/P><br \/>\n<P>I can&#8217;t pretend to know enough about the facts to have an opinion on the outcome of this ethics investigation.&nbsp; Absent a judge&#8217;s gag order, a lawyer certainly should be able to make truthful statements to the press, about a pending (and non-frivolous?) lawsuit.&nbsp;&nbsp; Whether doing so actually helps the client&#8217;s cause is another matter completely.&nbsp;&nbsp; I wonder if requiring &#8220;honorable&#8221; rather than &#8220;zealous&#8221; advocacy on behalf of a client would alter the lawyer&#8217;s ethical restraints or duties.&nbsp; (See our <A href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/2003\/07\/07#a95\">posting<\/A>&nbsp;about Arizona&#8217;s deletion of &#8220;zeal&#8221; from its Rules of Conduct.)<\/P><br \/>\n<P>Check out a recent article in Law Practice Management Magazine, <\/FONT><FONT face=\"Arial\"><EM><A href=\"http:\/\/www.abanet.org\/lpm\/magazine\/articles\/v29is4an7.shtml\">Dealing with the Media<\/A>: How to Protect and Enhance Your Clients&#8217; Interests<\/EM>, for some do&#8217;s and don&#8217;t when dealing with the press. (by Monica Bay, <\/FONT><FONT face=\"Arial\" color=\"#000000\">May\/June 2003, Vol. 29, Issue 4).<\/P><\/FONT><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&#8220;High-profile&#8221; New York lawyer John Aretakis uses the press as an integral part of his many lawsuits on behalf of victims of clergy sexual abuse.&nbsp; According to the New York Law Journal, he&#8217;s decided to go public with his fight against resulting ethics complaints, which he says are used by Albany&#8217;s Catholic Diocese to stifle [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":94,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[2926],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4532","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-pre-06-2006"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p6kP1R-1b6","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4532","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/94"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4532"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4532\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":14205,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4532\/revisions\/14205"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4532"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4532"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4532"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}