{"id":4514,"date":"2003-07-21T16:15:03","date_gmt":"2003-07-21T20:15:03","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/formerlyknownas\/2003\/07\/21\/competition-ethics-issues-of-"},"modified":"2011-08-05T15:00:49","modified_gmt":"2011-08-05T19:00:49","slug":"competition-ethics-issues-of-upl-are-on-aba-agenda-in-sf","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/2003\/07\/21\/competition-ethics-issues-of-upl-are-on-aba-agenda-in-sf\/","title":{"rendered":"Competition &amp; Ethics Issues of UPL Are on ABA Agenda in S.F."},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a name='a128'><\/a><\/p>\n<p><FONT face=\"Arial\"><br \/>\n<P>If you&#8217;re going to the ABA Annual Meeting in San Francisco in August, consider attending the panel on &#8220;Competition and Ethical Issues in the Unauthorized Practice of Law Debate,&#8221; presented by the Antitrust Section and held Aug. 11th (2:00 PM). Click <A href=\"http:\/\/www.abanet.org\/antitrust\/programs\/gen.pdf \">here<\/A> to see the Section&#8217;s full agenda. <\/P><br \/>\n<P>Two of the panel&#8217;s four members represent <STRONG>strongly opposing views<\/STRONG> on the role of nonlawyers in real estate settlements and on the general use of the &#8220;definition of the practice of law&#8221; to restrict the provision of law-related services by nonlawyers.&nbsp; They are <U>FTC General Counsel<\/U> <A href=\"http:\/\/www.abanet.org\/antitrust\/programs\/humphrey.html\">William E. Kovacic<\/A>, and <U>president-elect of the North Carolina State Bar<\/U>, <A href=\"http:\/\/www.abanet.org\/antitrust\/programs\/humphrey.html\">Dudley Humphrey<\/A>.&nbsp; Humphrey chaired the Ad Hoc Committee of the Council of the North Carolina State Bar on Residential Real Estate Closings.<\/P><br \/>\n<P>The FTC and the Justice Department submitted a <A href=\"http:\/\/www.ftc.gov\/os\/2002\/07\/non-attorneyinvolvment.pdf\">joint letter<\/A><\/FONT><FONT face=\"Arial\"> to the North Carolina State Bar (in late 2001) opposing a proposed ethics opinion that would have required attorneys to be present at all real estate closings.&nbsp; Humphrey played a prominent role drafting a response to that letter, dated 12\/14\/01 (but I couldn&#8217;t find the letter online). He was also a member of the <U><A href=\"http:\/\/www.abanet.org\/cpr\/model_def_home.html \">ABA Task Force<\/A><\/U> on the Model Definition of the Practice of Law.&nbsp;&nbsp; <\/FONT><FONT face=\"Arial\">On Dec. 20, 2002, a joint <A href=\"http:\/\/www.ftc.gov\/opa\/2002\/12\/lettertoaba.htm\"><FONT color=\"black\">FTC\/DOJ <I>letter<\/I><\/FONT><\/A> was submitted to that ABA Task Force opposing attempts to restrict competition from nonlawyers through broad definitions of the &#8220;practice of law.&#8221; (Dec. 20, 2002). <\/P><br \/>\n<P>We discussed these issues at length in&nbsp;our <I><A href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/2003\/07\/03#a89\">July 3, 2003 posting<\/A><\/I>. and our <A href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/2003\/07\/01\">July 1st posting<\/A>.&nbsp; The advocacy efforts of the federal agencies (along with a slew of <A href=\"http:\/\/www.abanet.org\/cpr\/model-def\/draft_def_comment.html\">other<\/A> commentors) helped convince the ABA task force to withdraw the proposed <A href=\"http:\/\/www.abanet.org\/cpr\/model_def_definition.html\">model definition<\/A> of the practice of law.&nbsp; &nbsp;However, the agencies&#8217; letter apparently had little effect on the resulting North Carolina ethics opinions, which were issued on Jan. 23, 2003. See <\/FONT><FONT face=\"Arial\" color=\"black\"><A href=\"http:\/\/www.ncbar.com\/eth_op\/ethics_sel.asp?ID=656&amp;LIST=number&amp;BACK='ethics_o.asp'\">Authorized Practice Advisory Opinion 2002-1<\/A><\/FONT><FONT face=\"Arial\">.<\/P><br \/>\n<P><\/P><br \/>\n<P>For more background information on this topic, see the <A href=\"http:\/\/www.ftc.gov\/opp\/ecommerce\/anticompetitive\/panel\/lammert.pdf\">submission<\/A> of Tom Lammert <\/FONT><FONT face=\"Arial\">General Counsel, National Real Estate Information Services, to the <A href=\"http:\/\/www.ftc.gov\/opp\/ecommerce\/anticompetitive\/index.htm \">FTC&#8217;s Public Workshop<\/A> on the <\/FONT><FONT face=\"Arial\" color=\"#000000\">Possible Anticompetitive Efforts to Restrict Competition on the Internet (Oct., 2002), which is entitled <\/FONT><FONT face=\"Arial\"><EM>State Regulation Impeding Competition on the Internet for Real Estate Settlement and Information Services.&nbsp; <\/EM>Also check out the recent <I>Legal Times <\/I>article by HALT&#8217;s Executive Director, Jim Turner, <EM><A href=\"http:\/\/www.halt.org\/flip\/legaltimesupl.php\">Lawyers vs. Nonlawyers<\/A><\/EM>. <\/FONT><\/P><br \/>\n<P align=\"center\"><FONT><FONT face=\"Times New Roman,Times,Serif\"><EM><STRONG>ethicalEsq?ethicalEsq?ethicalEsq?<\/STRONG><\/EM><\/FONT><\/FONT><\/P><br \/>\n<P align=\"left\"><FONT><STRONG>Thanks <\/STRONG>to <U>Steve Covell<\/U> at <A href=\"http:\/\/la-legal.com\/annotated\/\"><STRONG>La-Legal annotated&nbsp;<\/STRONG><\/A>&nbsp;for adding us to his comprehensive <U><A href=\"http:\/\/www.la-legal.com\/lawsites\/\">Legal Beetle<\/A><\/U> directory of &#8220;20,000&#8221; law-related sites.&nbsp; <\/P><\/FONT><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>If you&#8217;re going to the ABA Annual Meeting in San Francisco in August, consider attending the panel on &#8220;Competition and Ethical Issues in the Unauthorized Practice of Law Debate,&#8221; presented by the Antitrust Section and held Aug. 11th (2:00 PM). Click here to see the Section&#8217;s full agenda. Two of the panel&#8217;s four members represent [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":94,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[2926],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4514","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-pre-06-2006"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p6kP1R-1aO","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4514","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/94"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4514"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4514\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":14228,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4514\/revisions\/14228"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4514"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4514"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4514"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}