{"id":4513,"date":"2003-07-19T16:38:07","date_gmt":"2003-07-19T20:38:07","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/formerlyknownas\/2003\/07\/19\/unzealous-weekend-advocacy\/"},"modified":"2011-08-05T15:00:50","modified_gmt":"2011-08-05T19:00:50","slug":"unzealous-weekend-advocacy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/2003\/07\/19\/unzealous-weekend-advocacy\/","title":{"rendered":"Unzealous Weekend Advocacy"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a name='a126'><\/a><\/p>\n<p><FONT face=\"Arial\"><br \/>\n<P><I><U>Some Saturday Snippets<\/U><\/I>: <EM>I&#8217;m going to try to be pithy on this fine summer weekend, covering a couple of topics with relative brevity, so that we can all get serious about relaxation. <\/EM><\/P><br \/>\n<BLOCKQUOTE><br \/>\n<P><EM><U>Just Right?<\/U> Please use our <\/EM>&#8220;Suggestions&#8221; Box <EM>to let me know whether the lengthy discussion<\/EM> ethicalEsq? <EM>usually gives to topics&nbsp;covered here is too much, too little or just about right.<\/EM><EM> <\/EM><\/P><\/BLOCKQUOTE><br \/>\n<P dir=\"ltr\"><\/FONT><FONT face=\"Arial\" color=\"#ff0000\"><STRONG>Honorable&nbsp;Optimism<\/STRONG><\/FONT><FONT face=\"Arial\" color=\"#000000\">: In a posting on July 17, <\/FONT><FONT face=\"Arial\" color=\"#0000ff\"><A href=\"http:\/\/www.overlawyered.com\/archives\/000126.html\"><STRONG>Overlawyered.com<\/STRONG><\/A><\/FONT><FONT face=\"Arial\" color=\"#000000\">&#8216;s Walter Olson mentioned our <A href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/2003\/07\/07#a95 \">treatment<\/A> last week of Arizona&#8217;s word-change from &#8220;zealous&#8221; to &#8220;honorable&#8221; in its Rules of Conduct.&nbsp; Walter is hoping the word change will produce meaningful results, as<\/P><br \/>\n<BLOCKQUOTE><br \/>\n<P>&#8220;<\/FONT><FONT face=\"Arial\">Time and again, in our experience, the putative obligation to represent clients in a &#8220;zealous&#8221; fashion has proved the last resort of the scoundrel litigator and ethical edge-skater.&nbsp;&nbsp; Yes, in principle there can also arise dangers when lawyers aren&#8217;t zealous enough, but no sane observer could imagine that the big problem with American litigation is that lawyers care so much for honor that they aren&#8217;t combative enough.&#8221; <\/P><\/BLOCKQUOTE><br \/>\n<P>I&#8217;m cautiously optimistic that we&#8217;ll see a difference in conduct and attitude, but it will certainly take considerable amounts of CLE, more than a&nbsp;few judicial scoldings, and&nbsp;action or warnings from Bar Counsel, to make it happen.&nbsp; Please let <I>ethicalEsq? <\/I>know &#8212; with Comments or &#8220;Suggestions&#8221; &#8212; if: <\/P><br \/>\n<UL><br \/>\n<LI>your State or jurisdiction has adopted or is contemplating a similar deletion of the zealousness concept.<br \/>\n<LI>you have come across any good ethics opinions, articles or CLE materials on the proper meaning of zealous advocacy<\/LI><\/UL><\/FONT><FONT color=\"#ff0000\"><br \/>\n<P><STRONG><FONT face=\"Times New Roman,Times,Serif\"><\/FONT><\/STRONG>&nbsp;<\/P><br \/>\n<P><STRONG><FONT face=\"Times New Roman,Times,Serif\">P.S.<\/FONT><\/STRONG><\/FONT><FONT face=\"Times New Roman,Times,Serif\">&nbsp; <\/FONT><FONT color=\"#000000\"><FONT face=\"Times New Roman,Times,Serif\">I may not be feeling zealous today, but I am feeling somewhat <I><STRONG>humble<\/STRONG><\/I>.&nbsp; A couple days ago I <\/FONT><A href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/2003\/07\/17#a116 \"><FONT face=\"Times New Roman,Times,Serif\">complained<\/FONT><\/A><FONT face=\"Times New Roman,Times,Serif\"> about an instance of tax-whining by Eugene Volokh on his <STRONG><A href=\"http:\/\/volokh.com\/2003_07_13_volokh_archive.html#105837534250783690\">Volokh Conspiracy<\/A><\/STRONG>&nbsp;blog, hoping to get a substantive reponse to my arguments against the epidemic of taxophobia (misotaxia?) that has infected so many Americans.&nbsp; I guess <I>ethicalEsq? <\/I>doesn&#8217;t have the visibility it takes to deserve a reply on the merits (<EM>or<\/EM>, were my arguments simply irrefutable?).&nbsp; The good Professor and I did exchange a couple of friendly email messages (pardon my non-French), but nothing of substance to quote to my visitors.&nbsp; <\/FONT><FONT face=\"Times New Roman,Times,Serif\">Similarly, my <\/FONT><A href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/2003\/07\/16#a112 \"><STRONG><FONT face=\"Times New Roman,Times,Serif\">challenge to Public Citizen<\/FONT><\/STRONG><\/A><FONT face=\"Times New Roman,Times,Serif\"> to help fight abusive use of contingency fees has received no reply (BIG surpise).&nbsp; <\/FONT><\/FONT><\/P><br \/>\n<P><FONT color=\"#000000\"><FONT face=\"Times New Roman,Times,Serif\">On weekends at least, humility is good for me, but I don&#8217;t want to overdo it.&nbsp;&nbsp; Which is why I&#8217;m grateful to <\/FONT><\/FONT><FONT face=\"Times New Roman,Times,Serif\">Walter Olson.&nbsp; There&#8217;s nothing like a reference&nbsp;from <STRONG><A href=\"http:\/\/www.overlawyered.com\/ \">Overlawyered<\/A><\/STRONG> to bring visitor traffic to a site. Thanks again, Walter, for watching and touting this space.<\/FONT><FONT face=\"Arial\">&nbsp;&nbsp; .<\/P><\/FONT><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Some Saturday Snippets: I&#8217;m going to try to be pithy on this fine summer weekend, covering a couple of topics with relative brevity, so that we can all get serious about relaxation. Just Right? Please use our &#8220;Suggestions&#8221; Box to let me know whether the lengthy discussion ethicalEsq? usually gives to topics&nbsp;covered here is too [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":94,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[2926],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4513","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-pre-06-2006"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p6kP1R-1aN","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4513","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/94"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4513"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4513\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":14230,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4513\/revisions\/14230"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4513"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4513"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4513"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}