{"id":4054,"date":"2004-02-10T10:29:34","date_gmt":"2004-02-10T14:29:34","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/formerlyknownas\/2004\/02\/10\/dennis-kennedy-adds-his-insig"},"modified":"2011-08-05T14:59:03","modified_gmt":"2011-08-05T18:59:03","slug":"dennis-kennedy-adds-his-insight-on-virtual-english","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/2004\/02\/10\/dennis-kennedy-adds-his-insight-on-virtual-english\/","title":{"rendered":"Dennis Kennedy Adds His Insight on Virtual English"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a name='a747'><\/a><\/p>\n<p><DIV><FONT face=\"Arial\" size=\"2\">E-lawyering guru <\/FONT><A href=\"http:\/\/www.denniskennedy.com\/archives\/cat_legal_technology.html#000288\"><FONT face=\"Arial\" size=\"2\">Dennis Kennedy responded<\/FONT><\/A><FONT face=\"Arial\" size=\"2\"> last night to two recent <EM>e&amp;h<\/EM> posts with some helpful, but not totally satisfying, ideas.&nbsp; <\/FONT><\/DIV><br \/>\n<DIV><FONT face=\"Arial\" size=\"2\"><\/FONT>&nbsp;<\/DIV><br \/>\n<DIV><FONT face=\"Arial\" size=\"2\">We had <\/FONT><A href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/2004\/02\/06#a737\"><FONT face=\"Arial\" size=\"2\">opined<\/FONT><\/A><FONT face=\"Arial\" size=\"2\"> that using &#8220;virtual English&#8221; [that is, unreal, not-quite-apt&nbsp;English] to describe new forms of lawyering made possible by digital technology is often counterproductive&nbsp;for&nbsp;advancing the underlying concepts &#8212; because the average lawyer is turned off or confused by them.&nbsp; One example was Dennis&#8217; use of the term &#8220;virtual law firm.&#8221;&nbsp; Dennis responded:<\/FONT><\/DIV><br \/>\n<BLOCKQUOTE><br \/>\n<DIV><FONT face=\"Arial\" size=\"2\">Fortunately, I cleverly defined the term in my article, in no small part to avoid the issues David raises. I use the term &#8220;virtual law firm&#8221; almost exclusively when my main audience will be the lawyers and technologists who have a familiarity with both the concept and the use of the term as short-hand. I don&#8217;t think that it makes any sense to use the term when the audience is the public at large. Even in other contexts, I tend to define the term because I use the term in the sense of non-formalized collaborations, almost in the sense of food co-ops in rural areas, but also in the sense of project teams as <\/FONT><A href=\"http:\/\/www.tompeters.com\/\"><FONT face=\"Arial\" color=\"#999966\" size=\"2\">Tom Peters<\/FONT><\/A><FONT face=\"Arial\" size=\"2\"> might describe them.<\/FONT><\/DIV><\/BLOCKQUOTE><br \/>\n<P dir=\"ltr\"><FONT face=\"Arial\" size=\"2\">Picking your audience helps a lot, but Dennis&#8217; articles appear in professional magazines that are trying to educate and convert a much wider spectrum of lawyers than the technological cognoscente.&nbsp; His terminology becomes fixed, as it&#8217;s passed on down the line to the average lawyer (who might not get past the headline of an article saddled with such &#8220;virtual English&#8221;&nbsp;). Calling a team or network a &#8220;law firm&#8221; bends the English language in a way that cannot be helpful for current or future communication.&nbsp; <\/FONT><\/P><br \/>\n<P dir=\"ltr\"><FONT face=\"Arial\" size=\"2\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/cyber.law.harvard.edu\/blogs\/static\/ethicalesq\/ideadude001.jpg\" alt=\"idea dude small\" \/>&nbsp;&nbsp; To me, <STRONG>the time to create nomenclature that is understandable and sellable is when you are&nbsp;<EM>first<\/EM>&nbsp;naming&nbsp;a concept<\/STRONG>.&nbsp; As much as possible, the&nbsp;meaning of the term should be self-evident.&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/FONT><FONT face=\"Arial\" size=\"2\">That being said, I totally embrace Dennis&#8217;&nbsp;maxim that &#8220;The use of technology jargon, especially when combined with legal jargon, is both an occupational hazard and a practice to be avoided.&#8221;&nbsp; <\/FONT><\/P><br \/>\n<P dir=\"ltr\"><FONT face=\"Arial\" size=\"2\">Responding to my post on <A href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/2004\/02\/07#a739\">disappeared<\/A> Comments, Dennis also mentions the issue of using or not using Comments on a weblog, and cites to a good discussion by <A href=\"http:\/\/www.megnut.com\/weblogs\/007666.asp\">Megnut<\/A>.&nbsp;&nbsp; I agree with Dennis that it&#8217;s a question that is best left to each website owner\/editor, and with Megnut that having the ability to turn Comments on and off for each post can be particularly useful.&nbsp; My main point is that filtering out contrary opinions in comments and through Trackbacks &#8212; not for unacceptable tone but for commerical reasons &#8212; takes a lot of the enjoyment out of weblogging, as well as a lot of the sense of community.&nbsp;<\/FONT><\/P><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>E-lawyering guru Dennis Kennedy responded last night to two recent e&amp;h posts with some helpful, but not totally satisfying, ideas.&nbsp; &nbsp; We had opined that using &#8220;virtual English&#8221; [that is, unreal, not-quite-apt&nbsp;English] to describe new forms of lawyering made possible by digital technology is often counterproductive&nbsp;for&nbsp;advancing the underlying concepts &#8212; because the average lawyer is [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":94,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[2926],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4054","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-pre-06-2006"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p6kP1R-13o","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4054","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/94"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4054"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4054\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":13987,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4054\/revisions\/13987"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4054"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4054"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4054"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}