{"id":3924,"date":"2005-06-29T18:11:14","date_gmt":"2005-06-29T22:11:14","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/formerlyknownas\/2005\/06\/29\/our-outsourcing-decision-affi"},"modified":"2011-08-05T14:57:36","modified_gmt":"2011-08-05T18:57:36","slug":"our-outsourcing-decision-affirmed-by-me","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/2005\/06\/29\/our-outsourcing-decision-affirmed-by-me\/","title":{"rendered":"our outsourcing decision affirmed (by me)"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

In Comments <\/FONT><\/FONT>here<\/FONT><\/A> and <\/FONT>here<\/FONT><\/A>,<\/FONT> respectively, <\/FONT>Lisa Solomon<\/FONT><\/A> and <\/FONT>Carolyn Elefant<\/FONT><\/A> <\/FONT><\/DIV>
\n
have disagreed with yesterday’s post <\/FONT><\/FONT>when outsourcing, just pass on the cost<\/EM><\/FONT><\/A>  <\/FONT><\/DIV>
\n
(June 28, 2005).  I believe a lawyer\/firm should (1) tell a client whenever legal <\/FONT><\/DIV>
\n
services are going to be done by a “temporary” lawyer outside of the firm (or, <\/FONT><\/DIV>
\n
as in <\/FONT>the article<\/FONT><\/A> that touched off the topic, by individuals overseas not licensed <\/FONT><\/DIV>
\n
to practice in the firm’s jurisdiction); and (2) charge the client no more than the <\/FONT><\/DIV>
\n
actual amount paid for the outsourced services (plus any properly allocated <\/FONT><\/DIV>
\n
overhead), unless<\/EM> the client is fully informed that a surcharge is being added <\/FONT><\/DIV>
\n
and told the amount of the surchage. <\/FONT><\/DIV>
\n
<\/FONT> <\/DIV>
\n
First, let me reiterate a few tenets from my philosophy of “legal ethics”:<\/FONT><\/DIV>
\n