{"id":10637,"date":"2009-02-20T09:14:21","date_gmt":"2009-02-20T14:14:21","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/?p=10637"},"modified":"2011-08-05T14:53:09","modified_gmt":"2011-08-05T18:53:09","slug":"albany-city-court-judge-says-local-sex-offender-law-is-pre-empted","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/2009\/02\/20\/albany-city-court-judge-says-local-sex-offender-law-is-pre-empted\/","title":{"rendered":"Albany City Court Judge says local sex offender law is pre-empted"},"content":{"rendered":"

I<\/strong><\/em>n a thoughtful 12-page decision<\/a>, dated Feb. 18, 2009, Albany [New York] City Court Judge Thomas K. Keefe refused to enforce the City’s sex offender residency law, using the Oberlander<\/em> case<\/a> as precedent, and refusing to follow a decision by his City Court benchmate, Judge Rachel Kretser.\u00a0 See Peo. v. James Blair<\/em><\/a> (File #08-186882); “Sex offender residency case tossed<\/a>” (Albany Times Union<\/em>, Feb. 20, 2009).\u00a0 After citing the recent proposal to ban sex offenders from living near eachother in Colonie (see our prior post<\/a>), Judge Keefe notes:<\/p>\n

\"\" “As easily imagined and as was already noted by the Legislature, these ‘not in\u00a0 my backyard’ local residency restrictions create great difficulties for the Division of Parole, local probation and social service agencies to locate appropriate housing for sex offenders.”<\/p>\n

The Times Union<\/em> notes:<\/p>\n

“The conflicting decisions from the same court could send mixed messages to city police.<\/p>\n

“Attorney Terence Kindlon, whose firm is suing the county pro bono<\/em>, said he believes it would be ‘more intelligent than not to refrain from prosecuting these cases’.”<\/p>\n

” . . . Detective James Miller, a spokesman for the Albany Department of Public Safety, said officers in the city will keep making arrests.<\/p>\n

As the Times Union<\/em> Politics Blog<\/a> noted yesterday evening, “Amid all this, state Supreme Court Justice Roger McDonough is still considering a constitutional challenge to county law nearly identical to the one made in Rockland.”\u00a0 Justice McDonough has a summary judgment motion before him in the suit mentioned above brought by Terence Kindlon.<\/p>\n

It’s clear that we need statewide action on sex offenders.\u00a0 However, we also need politicians who will have the courage to oppose counterproductive and ineffective residency bans — like the fear-mongering S.01300<\/a>, proposed by Senate Majority Leader Malcolm A. Smith — that prevent whole classes of sex offenders from living in most populated areas, rather than allowing professionals to locate housing most appropriate for each individual sex offender.\u00a0 See our prior post “don’t let a bad idea go statewide<\/a>” (Feb. 2, 2009).\u00a0 If courage is lacking, perhaps politically-motivated leaders from rural areas of the state will rise up against S.01300<\/a>, which will force many sex offenders to live in less-populated areas.<\/p>\n

p.s. <\/strong><\/em> See the informative Wall Street Journal<\/em> article “After Prison, Few Places for Sex Offenders to Live<\/a>: Georgia’s Rules That Keep Some Convicted Felons Far From Children Create Challenges for Compliance, Enforcement” (Feb. 19, 2009; via Corey Yung<\/a>)<\/p>\n

\"\" N<\/em><\/strong>eed a more inspiring subject to head you toward the weekend?\u00a0 How about more haiku from the latest issue of Frogpond<\/em><\/a> [Vol. 32:1 (Winter 2009)], written by our Honored Guest Poets<\/a>?<\/p>\n

windowless classroom
\nwe talk about thinking
\noutside the box<\/p>\n

\n

Appalachian spring
\ncan I still learn
\nto play the violin<\/p>\n

…. by Yu Chang – Frogpond<\/em><\/a> Vol. 32:1 (Winter 2009)<\/p>\n

\n

lovers still
\na falling petal
\ncatches moonlight<\/p>\n

\n

fern fronds
\ntightly coiled–
\nthe fetus kicks<\/p>\n

…. by Peggy Willis Lyles – Frogpond<\/em><\/a> Vol. 32:1 (Winter 2009)<\/p>\n

\n

she would have
\npolished the silver
\nMom’s memorial<\/p>\n

\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

dogwood blossoms
\nMom’s ashes
\nlighter than expected<\/p>\n

…. by Carolyn Hall – Frogpond<\/em><\/a> Vol. 32:1 (Winter 2009)<\/p>\n

late August
\neel grass
\nbreaks the surface<\/p>\n

…. by Hilary Tann – Frogpond<\/em><\/a> Vol. 32:1 (Winter 2009)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In a thoughtful 12-page decision, dated Feb. 18, 2009, Albany [New York] City Court Judge Thomas K. Keefe refused to enforce the City’s sex offender residency law, using the Oberlander case as precedent, and refusing to follow a decision by his City Court benchmate, Judge Rachel Kretser.\u00a0 See Peo. v. James Blair (File #08-186882); “Sex […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":94,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[555,1414],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-10637","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-haiku-or-senryu","category-qs-quickies"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p6kP1R-2Lz","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10637","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/94"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10637"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10637\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":12035,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10637\/revisions\/12035"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10637"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10637"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10637"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}