{"id":10474,"date":"2009-01-13T21:39:33","date_gmt":"2009-01-14T02:39:33","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/?p=10474"},"modified":"2011-08-05T14:53:12","modified_gmt":"2011-08-05T18:53:12","slug":"olfactory-justice","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/2009\/01\/13\/olfactory-justice\/","title":{"rendered":"olfactory justice"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/files\/2009\/01\/jamespumpkinsmells.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-medium wp-image-10473\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/files\/2009\/01\/jamespumpkinsmells-300x218.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"139\" height=\"102\" \/><\/a> <em><strong>The Judge Nose Best<\/strong><\/em>: Can a judge dismiss an unsworn juror because &#8220;her strong body odor was negatively affecting the other jurors&#8221;?\u00a0 Massachusetts Superior Court Judge Nancy Staffier-Holtz thought she could, but defendant Rakeen Young objected, arguing that the juror was of his race.\u00a0 Noting that she indeed noticed the smell out in the lobby, Judge Staffier-Holtz stated:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 60px\">&#8220;[G]iven the strength of the body odor, I&#8217;m satisfied that the other jurors would be put at a distinct disadvantage in their efforts to concentrate.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>When Young contested the point on appeal, the Massachusetts Appeals Court agreed with the trial court judge.\u00a0 In<em> <\/em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.sociallaw.com\/slip.htm?cid=18729&amp;sid=119\"><em>Commonwealth vs. Rakeem Young<\/em><\/a> (Dkt. 07-P-146, Jan. 9, 2009), the Appeals Court explained that the trial judge had the right to dismiss a juror &#8220;in the best interests of justice.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px\">&#8220;We hold that the judge&#8217;s dismissal of the juror was not an abuse of her discretion. Here, the jury had not yet been sworn, and therefore, the judge had no duty to hold a hearing or find an extreme hardship. See G. L. c. 234A, \u00a7 39. The judge made sufficient findings on the record regarding her concern that the juror&#8217;s body odor would affect the ability of the other jurors to concentrate. Accordingly, the defendant&#8217;s claim fails.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>As Bob Ambrogi said at <em>Legal Blog Watch <\/em>yesterday, &#8220;The moral of the case: Justice may be blind, but it retains a healthy sense of smell.&#8221; (&#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/legalblogwatch.typepad.com\/legal_blog_watch\/2009\/01\/the-case-of-the-stinky-juror.html\">The Case of the Stinky Juror<\/a>,&#8221; Jan. 12, 2009)<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 60px\"><em>T<\/em>hat&#8217;s more than enough punditry for me today.\u00a0 Thanks goodness, Master Issa will help by putting in his two scents:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 60px\">\n<p style=\"text-align: center\">at the edge<br \/>\nof a stinking well&#8230;<br \/>\nplum blossoms<\/p>\n<p>smelling like sake<br \/>\nsmelling like piss<br \/>\nchrysanthemums<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 90px\">on honorable Buddha&#8217;s\u00a0 <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/files\/2008\/03\/snowman-buddha.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-medium wp-image-9044\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/files\/2008\/03\/snowman-buddha.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"90\" height=\"66\" \/><\/a><br \/>\nhonorable nose<br \/>\nan icicle<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center\">\n<p style=\"text-align: center\">&#8230; by <a href=\"http:\/\/haikuguy.com\/issa\/\">Kobayashi Issa<\/a>, translated by David G. Lanoue<\/p>\n<p><em>H<\/em>ad enough of the odious olfactory theme?\u00a0 Four years ago today, we introduced our readers to the pleasantly aromatic haiku professor-publisher-poet <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/2005\/01\/12\/haiku-hat-trick-welcoming-randy-brooks\/\">Randy Brooks<\/a>, with these poems:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center\">hands on the rail . . .<br \/>\nthe humpback whale<br \/>\ndoesn\u2019t resurface<\/p>\n<p>funeral procession . . .<br \/>\nsnowflakes blowing<br \/>\ninto the headlights<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 150px\">two lines in the water . . .<br \/>\nnot a word between<br \/>\nfather and son<\/p>\n<p>grandpa drags his daybed\u00a0 <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/files\/2008\/08\/sleep-logo-neg.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-medium wp-image-9704\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/files\/2008\/08\/sleep-logo-neg.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"50\" height=\"51\" \/><\/a><br \/>\nto the front porch. . .<br \/>\nmockingbird\u2019s songs<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center\">missing in action<br \/>\nshe dusts off his guitar<br \/>\nreturns it to the shelf<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center\">&#8230; by <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/2007\/04\/06\/randy-brooks-archive\/\">Randy Brooks<\/a> &#8211; from World Haiku Review, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.worldhaikureview.org\/1-3\/pages\/vintagehaiku_rbrooks.shtml\">Vintage Haiku of Randy Brooks<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Judge Nose Best: Can a judge dismiss an unsworn juror because &#8220;her strong body odor was negatively affecting the other jurors&#8221;?\u00a0 Massachusetts Superior Court Judge Nancy Staffier-Holtz thought she could, but defendant Rakeen Young objected, arguing that the juror was of his race.\u00a0 Noting that she indeed noticed the smell out in the lobby, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":94,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[555,3513],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-10474","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-haiku-or-senryu","category-lawyer-news-or-ethics"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p6kP1R-2IW","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10474","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/94"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10474"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10474\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":12068,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10474\/revisions\/12068"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10474"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10474"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10474"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}