{"id":10089,"date":"2008-10-06T10:55:09","date_gmt":"2008-10-06T15:55:09","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/?p=10089"},"modified":"2011-08-05T14:53:19","modified_gmt":"2011-08-05T18:53:19","slug":"hang-ups-over-banning-books","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/2008\/10\/06\/hang-ups-over-banning-books\/","title":{"rendered":"hang-ups over banning books"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.alastore.ala.org\/SiteSolution.taf?_sn=catalog&amp;_pn=product_detail&amp;_op=2372\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/www.alastore.ala.org\/catalog\/img\/pgraphic1-2372.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"93\" height=\"108\" \/><\/a><em><strong> A <\/strong><\/em>planned<em><strong> <\/strong><\/em>quick <em>mea culpa<\/em> over forgetting to post about this year&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bannedbooksweek.org\/\">Banned Books Week<\/a> &#8212; September 27 to October 4, 2008 &#8212; was complicated yesterday, when I saw an editorial in the Schenectady <em>Sunday Gazette<\/em> headlined &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.dailygazette.com\/news\/2008\/oct\/05\/1005_edit2\/\">No good reason to pull library book in Galway<\/a>&#8221; (October 5, 2008). (see <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/2007\/10\/01\/its-banned-book-week-so-read-one\/\">our 2007 BBW post<\/a> last year)<\/p>\n<p>Referring to <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dailygazette.com\/news\/2008\/oct\/03\/1003_book\/\">a story<\/a> published October 3rd by the <em>Gazette<\/em>, the Editors explained that the trustees of the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.galwaypubliclibrary.org\/\">Galway Public Library<\/a> (in the Saratoga County Town of <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Galway_(town),_New_York\">Galway<\/a>, New York, which has a population under 4000 and is located about 12 miles north of Schenectady), have at least temporarily pulled from its shelves the book <em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.hcibooks.com\/p-2939-girlology-hang-ups-hook-ups-and-holding-out.aspx\" target=\"_blank\">Hang-Ups, Hook-Ups, and Holding Out<\/a><\/em>:<em> stuff you need to know about your body, sex, and dating<\/em>&#8221; (Health Communications, by Melisa Holmes, M.D. and Trish Hutchison, M.D., 2008). <em>Hang-Ups<\/em> is part of the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.girlology.com\/\">Girlology<\/a> series of books aimed at pre-teen and teenage girls.\u00a0 The <em>Gazette <\/em>editorial starts:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px\">&#8220;Maybe Galway Public Library officials deserve some benefit of the doubt for agreeing to temporarily remove from their shelves a popular book on teen sexuality that a patron complained about, citing \u201c<em>factual errors, philosophy and perceived bias<\/em>.\u201d But not a whole lot, frankly \u2014 and none if they don\u2019t hurry up and put the book back, where it belongs.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/files\/2007\/10\/bbw2007.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"56\" height=\"56\" \/> &#8220;It\u2019s one thing to forbid your child to read a book you don\u2019t like or agree with, or to bring it into your home; it\u2019s entirely another to try to impose such a judgment or moral standard on the public \u2014 especially in a library, whose function is to make as much information, including opinion, on as many subjects as available as possible.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The editorial makes other important points, including:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>&#8220;Even if the book in question \u2014 \u201c<em>Hang-Ups, Hook-Ups, and Holding Out: Stuff You Need to Know About Your Body, Sex &amp; Dating<\/em>\u201d \u2014 did contain factual errors, removing it from circulation hardly seems like the proper response. Lots of books, including many good ones, have mistakes in them.&#8221;<\/li>\n<li>&#8220;Then there\u2019s this: What constitutes a mistake can be a matter of opinion; who decides? And where does one draw the line as to which mistakes are tolerable and which are not?&#8221;<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Like a large proportion of all books that targeted for removal from libraries and schools, <em>Hang-Ups<\/em> deals with teen sexuality.\u00a0 The<em> Gazette<\/em> notes that &#8220;Teen sexuality, and how to teach about sex to one\u2019s children, is a highly personal and \u2014 for some parents \u2014 ideological issue that shouldn\u2019t be decided by one member of a community, or even a committee.&#8221;\u00a0 The editorial correctly asserts that:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/files\/2007\/08\/checkedboxs.gif\" alt=\"\" \/> &#8220;If parents have reservations about the methods advocated by a particular author (in this case, two women doctors with teen children), they should instruct or even order their children to steer clear. But it shouldn\u2019t be their decision to make for the rest of the community.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dailygazette.com\/news\/2008\/oct\/03\/1003_book\/\"><em>Gazette<\/em> news article<\/a> about the controversy in Galway reported:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 60px\">&#8220;[Library Director Ashley] Poulin said a copy of the book was delivered to Dr. Anneke Pribis at the Galway Family Health clinic. &#8216;We\u2019ve asked Dr. Pribis to read the book to see if it is medically accurate,&#8217; Poulin said. &#8216;We haven\u2019t heard back from Anneke yet&#8217;.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.hcibooks.com\/p-2939-girlology-hang-ups-hook-ups-and-holding-out.aspx\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-medium wp-image-10093\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/files\/2008\/10\/2939_3.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"49\" height=\"73\" \/><\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/www.vimo.com\/doctor\/doctordetails\/Anneke-Pribis\/Family-Practice\/Galway\/New-York\/1208595\/\"> Dr. Pribis<\/a>, a family practitioner in Galway, has been asked to pass judgment on a book written by a two well-known experts on subjects related to juvenile gynecology and teenage sexuality (find more info on the authors <a href=\"http:\/\/www.hcibooks.com\/p-2939-girlology-hang-ups-hook-ups-and-holding-out.aspx\">here<\/a>).\u00a0 I haven&#8217;t been able to find information online about the complaining parent\/patron, Patti Venditti, but I would not be surprised to learn that her concerns have more to do with its &#8220;<em>philosophy and perceived bias<\/em>&#8221; than with the inaccuracy of any medical information provided in <em>Hang-Ups<\/em>. (Ms. Venditti is invited to tell us more about her concerns by leaving a Comment below.)<\/p>\n<p>My quick online research about <em>Hang-Ups<\/em> uncovered only positive reviews of the book.\u00a0 For example, seven parents reviewed the book at <a href=\"http:\/\/blog.parentbloggers.com\/2007\/09\/06\/girlology-hang-ups-hook-ups-and-holding-out-heres-what-theyre-saying-so-far\/\"><em>The Parent Bloggers Network<\/em><\/a>, and the post <a href=\"http:\/\/blog.parentbloggers.com\/2007\/09\/17\/girlology-hang-ups-hook-ups-and-holding-out-where-has-this-book-been-all-my-life\/\">summarizing<\/a> the reviews says:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px\">&#8220;The consensus among the bloggers who reviewed <em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.girlology.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Girlology: Hang-Ups, Hook-Ups, and Holding Out<\/a><\/em> is that we all wish we\u2019d had this book when we were growing up.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px\">And this blogger summed it up beautifully:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px\">\u201cIs this book for you? If you\u2019re a teenage girl? Yes. If you\u2019re the mother, father, friend, teacher, or confidant of a teenage girl? Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes.\u201c<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/Girlology-Hang-Ups-Hook-Ups-Holding-Out\/dp\/0757305865\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-medium wp-image-10094\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/files\/2008\/10\/2939.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"43\" height=\"65\" \/><\/a> <em>Hang-Ups<\/em> also got a rave positive review by a parent <a href=\"http:\/\/momtothescreamingmasses.typepad.com\/scrutiny_by_the_masses\/2007\/08\/girlology-hang-.html\">at the <em>Scrutiny by the Masses<\/em><\/a> weblog.<\/p>\n<p><em>My<\/em> concern is with the willingness of the Library trustees in Galway to pull the book pending their final determination. One trustee told the <em>Gazette<\/em> that this is the first time they&#8217;ve had such a complaint in the history of the Galway Public Library, which was founded in 1998.\u00a0 It&#8217;s clear the trustees either have, or were aware of, no procedure for handling a request that a book be removed from the Library. This is the full treatment of Ms. Venditti\u2019s complaint from the<a href=\"http:\/\/www.galwaypubliclibrary.org\/2008-08.pdf\"> August 2008 Minutes<\/a> of the Library Board of Directors (Aug. 6, 2008):<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 60px\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/www.galwaypubliclibrary.org\/contact-address.gif\" alt=\"\" width=\"48\" height=\"53\" \/> <em>Public Comment<\/em>:\u00a0 Patti Venditti, a Galway library patron and mother, brought up concerns about a book in the library\u2019s collection, <em>Hang-Ups, Hook-Ups and Holding Out<\/em>, due to factual errors, philosophy and perceived bias. Ashley [Poulin, Library Director] will provide Patti with a form to fill out for possible culling of the book.\u00a0 Arlene [Rhodes] moved and Laura [Sakala] seconded that the book be removed from circulation pending determination.\u00a0 The motion carried.\u00a0 Patti will be taking the book home with her for use in completing the form.<\/p>\n<p>Yes, that&#8217;s right: On the basis one person&#8217;s concerns, a popular and much-praised book was taken from the Galway Library shelves &#8220;for possible culling&#8221; (and handed over to the complainant to help her write up her complaints).\u00a0 This seems a far cry from the American Library Association&#8217;s policy on <a href=\"http:\/\/ethics.iit.edu\/codes\/coe\/amer.library.assoc.access.minors.1972.html\">Free Access to Libraries for Minors<\/a> (June 30 1972), which the NYS Public Library Department <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nysl.nysed.gov\/libdev\/helpful.htm\">recommends<\/a> for adoption by all public libraries in this State.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 60px\"><strong><em>good-news update<\/em><\/strong> (October 10, 2008): In an email to me this afternoon, Ashley Poulin, Director of the Galway Library informs me that &#8220;The review has been completed and the determination was made to keep [<em>Hang-Ups<\/em>] on the shelf.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 60px\"><strong><em>update<\/em><\/strong> (October 15, 2008): The Schenectady <em>Gazette<\/em> reports today that &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.dailygazette.com\/news\/2008\/oct\/15\/1015_controversial\/\">Controversial teen book back on shelves at Galway library<\/a>&#8221; (by Kathy Bowen, Oct. 15, 2008). Oddly, Joanna Lasher, President of the Library Board of Trustees, now says the book was never actually taken out of circulation. &#8220;It was not out of circulation; it was being reviewed and was still part of the collection,&#8221; Lasher said.\u00a0 I just checked the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.galwaypubliclibrary.org\/2008-08.pdf\">Board&#8217;s August 2008 Minutes<\/a>, and it still says &#8220;Arlene [Rhodes] moved and Laura [Sakala] seconded that the book be removed from circulation pending determination.\u00a0 The motion carried.&#8221;\u00a0 If the Board is a little squeamish about having over-reacted, that bodes well for the future.<\/p>\n<p>Here are two pertinent excerpts from the <a href=\"http:\/\/ethics.iit.edu\/codes\/coe\/amer.library.assoc.access.minors.1972.html\">ALA policy<\/a> on access for minors:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>&#8220;Restrictions are often initiated under the assumption that certain materials are &#8216;harmful&#8217; to minors, or in an effort to avoid controversy with parents who might think so. The librarian who would restrict the access of minors to materials and services because of actual or suspected parental objection should bear in mind that he is not in loco parentis in his position as librarian. Individual intellectual levels and family backgrounds are significant factors not accommodated by a uniform policy based upon age.&#8221;<\/li>\n<li>&#8220;The American Library Association holds that it is the parent-and only the parent-who may restrict his children and only his children-from access to library materials and services. The parent who would rather his child did not have access to certain materials should so advise the child.&#8221;<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px\"><em>By the Way<\/em>: The online catalog for our regional Library System <a href=\"http:\/\/pac.sals.edu\/polaris\/search\/searchresults.aspx?ctx=92.1033.0.0.6&amp;type=Keyword&amp;term=Hang-Ups&amp;by=TI&amp;sort=MP&amp;limit=TOM=*%20and%20AB={list}30,%2043,%2050,%2075,%2076,%2081,%2086,%2092,%2097,%20110{\/list}&amp;query=&amp;page=0#__pos1\">shows<\/a> that the Schenectady County Public Library has 3 copies of <em>Girology&#8217;s Hang-Up<\/em>s book; and that Galway Public Library&#8217;s single copy is &#8220;Out (due: 10\/15\/08).&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/files\/2008\/10\/bbw2007.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-medium wp-image-10091\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/files\/2008\/10\/bbw2007.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"64\" height=\"64\" \/><\/a> It&#8217;s difficult to image any valid reason for keeping <em>Hang-Ups<\/em> off the shelves at the Galway Public Library, or any other public or school library.\u00a0 This incident a few miles down the road demonstrates the continued need to celebrate <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bannedbooksweek.org\/\">Banned Books Week<\/a> &#8212; to educate the public and public servants about both the importance of free speech (and access to information) and the responsibility of parents to monitor what their children read (as opposed to asking their librarians to act <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/In_loco_parentis\"><em>in loco parentis<\/em><\/a>).<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px\">At the Banned Books Week website, you&#8217;ll find <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bannedbooksweek.org\/info.html\">information<\/a> about books and authors have been most challenged in recent years, along with quite a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bannedbooksweek.org\/support.html\">few ideas<\/a> about how you can help protect free speech and access (<em>e.g.<\/em>, visiting the linked pro-censorship sites is an eye-opening experience).<\/p>\n<p>The ALA and other sponsors of BBW want you to know that:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 60px\">&#8220;More than a thousand books have been challenged since 1982. The challenges have occurred in every state and in hundreds of communities. People challenge books that they say are too sexual or too violent. They object to profanity and slang, and protest against offensive portrayals of racial or religious groups&#8211;or positive portrayals of homosexuals. Their targets range from books that explore the latest problems to classic and beloved works of American literature.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.bannedbooksweek.org\/\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-medium wp-image-10090\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/files\/2008\/10\/bks-300x75.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"384\" height=\"96\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center\">&#8211; some of the many acclaimed books targeted for banishment in the past two decades &#8211;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.ala.org\/ala\/aboutala\/offices\/oif\/bannedbooksweek\/bbwlinks\/authors19902004.cfm\">The Top Ten Challenged Authors from 1990 &#8211; 2004<\/a> were:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center\">1. Alvin Schwartz\u00a0 2. Judy Blume\u00a0 3. Robert Cormier 4. J.K. Rowling 5. Michael Willhoite<br \/>\n6. Katherine Paterson 7. Stephen King 8. Maya Angelou 9. R.L. Stine 10. John Steinbeck<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left\">Please don&#8217;t let the passing of Banned Books Week keep you from getting involved.\u00a0 The Galway Public Library expects to issue its judgment on Hang Ups in November, and similar decisions are made year-round in hundreds of communities, of all sizes, across the nation.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;padding-left: 30px\"><a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/files\/2008\/10\/earthbutbigcover.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-medium wp-image-10095\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/files\/2008\/10\/earthbutbigcover.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"55\" height=\"80\" \/><\/a> <em><strong>T<\/strong><\/em>he <em>f\/k\/a<\/em> Gang has run out of time for posting today.\u00a0 Rather than dig up new haiku and senryu, here are some of the poems we found for <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/2007\/10\/01\/its-banned-book-week-so-read-one\/\">our post about BBW 2007<\/a>, which featured the book \u201c<em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/exec\/obidos\/tg\/detail\/-\/0763620912\/qid=1122313317\/sr=8-5\/ref=pd_bbs_5\/002-9484421-4857663?v=glance&amp;s=books&amp;n=507846\">The Earth, My Butt, and Other Big Round Things<\/a><\/em>&#8221; (Candlewick 2005), by Carolyn Mackler (which was high on the list of challenged books in 2006, due to its sexual content, offensive language, and purported purported anti-family message and age group unsuitability):<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>after school meeting<br \/>\ncollage clouds turn<br \/>\nround and round<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>big enough <img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/files\/2007\/09\/full-moom.gif\" alt=\"\" \/><br \/>\nto pedal home on<br \/>\nwinter moon<\/p>\n<p>\u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026 by <a href=\"\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/matt-morden-archive\/\">Matt Morden<\/a> &#8211; from <em><a href=\"http:\/\/mordenhaikupoetry.blogspot.com\/\">Morden Haiku<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>family picnic<br \/>\nthe new wife\u2019s rump<br \/>\nbigger than mine<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>earth tremor<br \/>\nthe teapot sings<br \/>\noff-key<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\u2026\u2026 by <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/roberta-beary-archive\">Roberta Beary<\/a> &#8211; from <em>The Unworn Necklace<\/em> (Snapshots Press, 2007; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.snapshotpress.co.uk\/orderform.htm\">order<\/a>); \u201cfamily picnic\u201d &#8211; <em>Modern Haiku<\/em> (favorite senryu award, 2003)<\/p>\n<p><em><strong>p.s.<\/strong><\/em> Free speech is just as important <em>auf Deutsch<\/em>.\u00a0 In this week&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.lawpundit.com\/blog\/2008\/10\/blawg-review-180.htm\"><em>Blawg Review<\/em> #180<\/a> we&#8217;re reminded that the White House has declared today to be <a href=\"http:\/\/www.lawpundit.com\/blog\/2008\/10\/blawg-review-180.htm\">German-American Heritage Day<\/a>.\u00a0 <em>Law Pundit<\/em> Andis Kaulis presents many interesting facts for those who only think of Bier und Oktober Fest this time of year, including the surprise (to many of us) that &#8220;<span style=\"font-family: verdana,arial,helvetica,sans serif;color: #000000;font-size: x-small\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/German_American\">German Americans<\/a> make up the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.census.gov\/prod\/2004pubs\/c2kbr-35.pdf\">largest acknowledged ancestry group in America<\/a>, even larger than the Irish and the English.<\/span>&#8221;\u00a0 Thanks to Andis for including <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/2008\/10\/04\/lady-judge-says-ladies-nights-are-not-unconstitutional\/\">our post on Ladies&#8217; Nights<\/a> in his list of notable recent blawg postings.<\/p>\n<p>Speaking of libraries, laws, and access to information, check out Laura Orr&#8217;s important piece at <em>Oregon Legal Research<\/em>, &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/oregonlegalresearch.blogspot.com\/2008\/10\/lets-kill-all-law-libraries.html\">Let&#8217;s Kill All the Law Libraries<\/a>&#8221; (Oct. 3, 2008)<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px\">\n<\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A planned quick mea culpa over forgetting to post about this year&#8217;s Banned Books Week &#8212; September 27 to October 4, 2008 &#8212; was complicated yesterday, when I saw an editorial in the Schenectady Sunday Gazette headlined &#8220;No good reason to pull library book in Galway&#8221; (October 5, 2008). (see our 2007 BBW post last [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":94,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[555,2927,900],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-10089","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-haiku-or-senryu","category-schenectady-synecdoche","category-viewpoint"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p6kP1R-2CJ","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10089","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/94"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10089"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10089\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":12160,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10089\/revisions\/12160"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10089"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10089"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/ethicalesq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10089"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}