Hey, kids, don’t forget: some judges can Google. See this AP article:
“Mich. judge ridiculed on teens’ Web site strikes back,” Jan. 30, 2006,
which starts:
![]()
A judge who sentenced three teenagers to probation for
being drunk at their high school prom had them jailed after
he saw them drinking and ridiculing him on a Web site one
of them created.
“I told them, ‘If you think this gives me any pleasure, you’re
wrong,'” Oakland County District Judge Michael Martone said
after sentencing the last of the girls, Amanda Senopole, to 10
Ernie the Attorney Svenson has sympathy for young lawyers dealing
with the “High cost of legal education” (Feb. 2, 2006), quoting from
a National Law Journal piece “As Salaries Rise, So Does the Debts”
(LawJobs.com, Feb. 1, 2006). I don’t like seeing young people in
great financial distress either, but the best quotes in the NLJ article,
could have been said by some of the old curmudgeons around f/k/a
“carblueSF”
But law students are partly to blame, said Joseph Harbaugh,
dean of Nova Southeastern University Shepard Broad Law
Center in Fort Lauderdale, Fla. Would-be lawyers live too
comfortably while in school and fail to make the necessary
sacrifices, he said, adding that a quicklook at any law school
parking lot proves his point. “The students’ cars are better than
the faculty and staff’s cars,”said Harbaugh, who is also a board
member of Access Group, a nonprofit provider of student loans
for graduate and professional degrees.
Another important observation is made in the article via Harbaugh:
Law schools calculate the amount of money students need
for tuition and for living expenses into their budgets, which
helps determine how much federalloan money their students
can borrow. Harbaugh said that many law schools do a dis-
service to students by raising their budgets to accommodate
so-called cost-of-attendance fees, which are those expenses
that law students have for attending school other than tuition
and fees.
On the other hand, I do not buy the excuses of the Pace Law School
Dean:
Stephen Friedman, dean of Pace University School of Law in
White Plains, N.Y., points to the “basic economics” of law schools,
which, unlike corporations, cannot “sell more stuff or operate more
efficiently.” . . . Your only alternative is to raise prices — the
fundamental driver behind this extraordinary increase,” he said.
Well, Dean Friedman, I bet you could operate a bit more efficiently. How
about using more adjunct faculty? And, given that there are many times
more competent applicants for law professor slots than there are available
positions, how about trimming some of those fulltime teaching salaries?
The Chicago-School and federalist-types will surely understand the supply-
demand economics. (Cf. TCSDaily, How Wal-mart is like academia, by
James H. Joyner, R., Jan. 27, 2006; via RiskProf)
![]()
Ohio Bar Ethics Rules: You have only 13 days to get your comments to the
Ohio Supreme Court on the Report of its Code revision Task Force and
its Proposed Rules. As we explained in detail last week, Ohio consumers
need your voice to help assure them the protection and competition they
deserve. For example, as written, the Proposed Rules would continue to ban
lawyer ads that mention discount or cut-rate fees. In addition, a State Bar
committee had recommended against a proposed requirement for a written fee
and scope-of-engagement statement for each matter above $500.
Taking my own advice, I emailed Ohio State Bar President
E. Jane Taylor, hoping she would help assure that pro-
client positions were taken by OSBA’s House of Delegates
last Friday. She wrote back sayinglively debate was had
on both points you raise, as well as on many others.” I have
not, however, been able to find out the final recommendations
of OSBA. If you know, please leave a comment or email me.
In response to my statement that bar associations act far too
offten like guilds, Jane Taylor also wrote: “One of the many jobs
one has as the leader of a state wide bar association is to guide
the organization to find, in policy matters, the right balance be-
tween the interests of our members and our obligation to inform
and protect the public. The perspective of a person such as your-
self is quite useful to the process.”
Over at MyShingle, Carolyn Elefant wonders on behalf of ghost-writing
associates: “Why Would You Blog At Biglaw?“. There’s a nice debate
over whether it matters at Evan Schaeffer’s Legal Underground. Check
it out, along with my oh-so-reasonable perspective.
Professor Bainbridge has been experimenting with a new hobby — shooting
still life photographs of wine bottles (everybody needs a hobby). It looks
artistically promising, but he’s hoping photo buffs will help him with some
lighting issues.
“snowflakeS” Time for a relaxing, thoughtful moment with
Hilary Tann. Maybe Prof. B will bring the wine.
quietly
we become
audience
there should
be a name for it
snow light
sitting
where I sat as a child
I wait out the storm
mountaintop
winter grasses
blown clean of seed
February 2, 2006
a couple of lawttes, please
Comments Off on a couple of lawttes, please