We might not like the name (“law porn“) that law professors gave
to the avalanche of slick brochures they receive from horn-tooting
law schools. But, we sure can relate to the general queasiness
that comes from finding a mailbox stuffed with glossy solicitations
from every educational institution you — or an offspring of yours —
have every attended.
This topic became topical for me, with yesterday’s
announcement that the Post Rate Commission has approved
a rate hike request of approximately 5.4% for most kinds of mail
delivered by the United States Postal Service. (See AP/Boston
Globe article). The news coincided with a dumpster-ful of
brochures and catalogues being stuffed into my home mailbox
this afternoon — many of them from schools or alumni associ-
ations, and all of them receiving discounted rates under the USPS
Let’s be clear: I do not begrudge the USPS getting two cents more
for first class postage starting in January 2006, and am not one of
those who bash USPS for poor service — necessitating this great
PR letter from USPS. What I do wonder about is the special
break — the recommendation of a smaller rate increase — for
non-profit entities. According to the Associated Press/Globe:
“The rate commission said its decision reduced proposed
increases for nonprofit organizations and small local news-
papers, but would raise the post office’s planned charges
for mailing books and media materials.”
Nice priorities! It’ll cost more for me to send books, so that schools
can continue to mail me costly presentations imploring me to endow
a chair or two, or honoring alumni for their donations, and enticing me
to travel to exotic places with famous educators for $20,000 or more
per person (double occupancy).
One of the pieces in today’s mail proudly announced that “In fiscal
year 2005, more than 135 alumni took Travel Society trips to such
destinations as Costa Rica, Alaska and the Antietam National
Battlefield.” That’s right: thousands upon thousands of glossies
were mailed to alumni several times during the year — at discount
mailing rates — so that “more than 135” of those with substantial
disposable income could take an Alumni-affiliated trip. What a
deal.
Hey, Harvard: You’re the most prolific of the Travel-
Guide spammers. It seems like two or three a month,
sometimes more. Save the money, I’m never going.
“mailboxN” I don’t know if UPS and FedEx are right that the United States
Postal Service is “using profits from its first-class mail monopoly
to fund Priority Mail and Express Mail, which compete with their small
package deliveries.” (Atlanta Journal-Constitution, “Snail Mail Costs
scheduled to rise,” Nov. 2, 2005.) But, I do know that the Postal Rate
Commission wants to make it easier for ACLU and CATO Institute,
Harvard, Georgetown, McQuaid Jesuit High, and all sorts of political
action committees to send me stuff. And, I don’t like it.
Maybe I can’t stop my spamma maters from overwhelming my poor
mail carrier, and undermining my faith in higher education. But, I’d
like to suggest one requirement for all mailers who want to send
discounted or junk-mail, and especially non-profits who get an even
bigger break: On each piece of mail state “It cost us $_____ to send
you this item.” Members of the public might be moved by such
information to ask for new priorities at the Postal Rate Commission.
Alumni might let their schools know that they should save that fee,
plus the expensive production costs, and put us on a “Do Not Mail
List.” Then, maybe, there’s a chance of a bequest from me down
the line.
What ever happened to the category “third-class mail”?
Was somebody afraid of hurting the feelings of the senders?
The recipients? The Postally Correct crowd strikes again.
Enough said — and more than enough received.
p.s. To GEICO and AARP: I do not need to hear from
you every single week.
by dagosan
special delivery –
a smile from
the pregnant mailman
[Nov. 2, 2005]
“NoYabutsSN”
November 2, 2005
subsidizing your spam-ma mater
Comments Off on subsidizing your spam-ma mater
poesia di un alito?
Since discovering that “alito” means “breath” in Italian,
I’ve wondered how you say “one-breath poetry” in that
language. As I have never studied the language of my
ancestors, I can only guess: “poesia di un alito.” Help
from readers would be appreciated.
Meanwhile, enjoy a few one-breath poems
from Lee Gurga:
morning calm . . .
heavy with frost the leaves
continue to fall
darkness before dawn–
the way your legs sleep
not closed not open
first snow–
the little boy laughing
in his sleep
television light
flickers on my children’s faces —
autumn sunset
(Brooks Books, 1998)
by dagosan
from last November:
even lovelier
naked
backyard elm

Easy choice: Right now, there is a blue sky outside the
bay-window of my home office, with bright sunshine
illuminating the remaining golden leaves on surrounding
trees. I could write a few blurbs on lawyerly or political
issues, or I could go outside right now, and enjoy this
aumtumn day before the early sunset arrives. Well?
While strolling along the Mohawk River, I’ll perhaps
have a haiku inspiration to bring home for dagosan.
If you really need some commentary to keep you busy
until you can leave your office, check out the RiskProf‘s
discussion of terror torts, and the list of questions about
abortion law shoud Roe v, Wade be overturned, presented
at Mirror of Justice, and written by Prof. Steve Shiffrin.
Comments Off on poesia di un alito?