You are viewing a read-only archive of the Blogs.Harvard network. Learn more.

f/k/a archives . . . real opinions & real haiku

August 23, 2005

not fade away

Filed under: pre-06-2006 — David Giacalone @ 7:00 pm

underside
of the red canvas awning
not faded

in the appliance store doorway
calling a Maytag box
home

city lights
trying to make out
the constellations

… by Carolyn Hall – from the haibun “Protective Coloration”
in The Loose Thread: RMA 2001; orig., stone frog

no impatiens this year –  napper gray sm
resenting
the lazy neighbor

… by dagosan [Aug. 23, 2005]

potluck

tiny check Why does Prof. Bainbridge have to go and ruin a perfectly valid point by needlessly slinging mud?   Today, in a post concerning the firing of Michael Graham by ABC Radio, he correctly explains:

“The First Amendment limits only the power of government, in general. The First Amendment, absent state action, therefore generally does not prohibit a private employer from firing one of its employees.”


But, then, Steve just had to say:

“This sort of rights talk, claiming to have Constitutional protections one obviously lacks, is particularly disappointing coming from a conservative. . . . My point is only that I hate to see conservatives invoking the lex-centric rights language of the left rather than relying on markets and politcs for redress.”


The mistaken invocation of the First Amendment against private action is something that every American has heard since birth. [Try living with a teenager and see how often you face such arguments.]  Those who erroneously believe that all Americans have the right to say whatever they want whenever they want come from all walks of life and all ideologies and parties.   Indeed, most of the 1st Amendment ignorati wouldn’t know an ideology if it bit them on their bainbridge.   It is basic ignorance of the meaning of the Bill of Rights [which Prof. B appears to believe was given that name by a leftwing cabal, which hoped to indoctrinate the populace and fool a few judges] and not some liberal worldview that causes most Americans to decry private forms of “censorship” as unAmerican.
froglegs

sunlit shallows
a frog burrows deeper
into the mud

…… by Carolyn Hall – Snapshots  #10 (2004)


tiny check I think even Steve Bainbridge would agree that today’s NYT articleScientists Speak Up on Mix of God and Science” is quite evenhanded. (by Cornelia Dean, Aug. 23, 2005).

August 22, 2005

bowing back

Filed under: pre-06-2006 — David Giacalone @ 5:32 pm

 




I’m running late today and heading out the door —

but not without attending to Priority #1: some fine

haiku.  Today, from Peggy Lyles:

 

 

 

 

mayflies

spin between us . . .

a lost though

 

 






ceiling fan

 







hyacinth . . .

I paint a shape

without a name

 

 

 

 

 

 






the peacock’s fan

a little boy

bows back

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

a new term

clear water tumbles

over stones

 

 

Peggy Lyles from Snapshots Haiku Magazine #9 (2001)

 










rounding the curve —

an almost-full moon

rolls back into view


[Aug.22, 2005]  

bocci potluck





tiny check Martin Grace is spreading the risk over at RiskProf, with the addition of

his former student, Ty Leverty, who now teaches in the Department of

Finance at the University of Iowa. Martin is right: Ty’s first post — on

scammed carnival operators — fits comfortably into the RiskProf tradition. 

I’m looking forward to their cross-subsidization/fertilization efforts.

 

                                                                                                                          bocciN

August 21, 2005

hard peddling

Filed under: pre-06-2006 — David Giacalone @ 6:49 pm


we’re here

we might as well build

a sand castle

 

 

 

 

 

 







marsh tide

turns around

a lily

 

 

 

 

 


canoeing pair small neg


 


 

hard paddling

the wind

dries my teeth

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 







blossoms –

talk of bringing back

the draft

 

 

 



 






  • by dagosan                                               





the power boat’s wake —

a pair of ducks

gets goosed

 

 

[Aug. 21, 2005]

 

 

cautionEdges   orig.

 

potluck



tiny check  pun. what pun?  Thanks to Tim Weigel of the “KoizumiMacCareerAngstBlog
for getting past the pun and pointing to Yabut’s 1L of a decision.  On another

topic, how often to you hit the “insert” key inadvertently?  haikuEsq does it

a lot, and doesn’t even have the poor keyboard design issue raised by Tim.  

 
tiny check Evan Schaeffer notes that the Ernst v. Merck Vioxx case has spawned a lot of 

hateful anti-lawyer sentiment, including a crude Comment at his weblog. 

Running into venom like that is perhaps the least pleasant part of participation

in the blogosphere.

 

tiny check  NoBody’s Business has posted a great photo that shouldn’t be missed

by nannyphobes or nannyphiles alike.  See Caution, Nannies Ahead!

(via Walter at Overlawyered & BoingBoing)

 

tiny check  How long will it take before the title of today’s post spawns a

bawdy entry for The Inadvertent Searchee page?

 

 

                                                                            Hey, Ed & Laurice, Have a great vacation!  canoeing pair small neg

 

 

August 20, 2005

lanoue on his own

Filed under: pre-06-2006 — David Giacalone @ 6:27 pm

Thanks to the translations of Prof. David Lanoue, this website is adorned with

hundreds of haiku by the great Japanese Master Kobayashi Issa.  Nonetheless,

I wish David would spend more time drafting his own haiku (and his haiku novels). 

 

Here are a few Lanoue originals:

 








from a friend far away
express mailed
squash

 

 

 

 

backyard moon

mosquitos rush the poem

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 


 

flower illiterate

I wander the garden

wordless

 

 

 

 

 









the “Lost Dog” sign

nailed deep

into the oak

 

 

David G. Lanoue — see his World Haiku Assn bio page

“flower illiterate” – from Walking the Same Path (HSA Memb. Anthology 2004)

“the ‘Lost Dog’ sign”-  Frogpond XXVII: 2

 








  • by dagosan                                               






end of August —

bees shun

the wrinkled roses

 

[Aug. 20, 2005]

 

potluck


tiny check vioxx con dios: The blawgisphere is aglow from heated commentary on  scales rich poor neg

the $253 million verdict in Ernst v. Merck.  One could have guessed in advance

how the post-verdict sides would be lining up.  Ted Frank has some choice

observations; Walter Olson collects links; and Steve Bainbridge fears that

Merck will go bankrupt.  Evan Schaeffer reminds his colleagues not to start

spending their millions yet (and frankly notes that the Ernst case had some

major causation problems).  I’ve remained neutral in the “tort reform” debate,

but this case does suggest that juries can really go overboard with punitive

damages.  (The $229 million in punitives here will apparently be reduced to

$1.6 million under the Texas statute.)  With thousands of cases in the pipeline,

no single jury should feel the need to punish Merck so harshly.)


“tinyredcheck” Challenged to cap his own fees from Vioxx cases,

Evan Schaeffer links to a prior post in which he

discusses his approach to contingency fees.  In

the Comments to that post, you will find my humble

attempts to re-educate Evan on the ethical shortcomings

of the standard contingency fee. 

 

tiny check Thanks to mowabb at Blawg Wisdom for pointing to our post 1L of a decision.

BW aggregates “advice about law school from those who are in it,” but was

open-minded enough to give a cranky old coot another forum.  BW picked

up our link via our loyal visitor, Jeremy Richey.  Thanks, JR.

 

 

scales over

 

 

August 19, 2005

friday done gone (the cricket, too)

Filed under: pre-06-2006 — David Giacalone @ 6:54 pm

Here are a few of my favorites from paul m

They should help ease into one of the  last 

weekends of summer 2005. 

 

 






summer grasses


an old blue car


without doors

 

 

 

 

 

creek overlook


a flat rock


becomes uncomfortable

 

 

 

 








no one to tell


the alpine sky heavy


with thunderclouds

 

 

“sunMtsFrameG”

 

 




back again


the driftwood thrown


with all my strength

 

 


“creek overlook” – the heron’s nest

summer grasses acorn / tinywords.com 

“no one to tell–” – acorn

“back again” – acorn; pegging the wind (rma 2002)


 






  • by dagosan                                               





something I said?

the cricket’s

gone, too

 

 

[Aug. 19, 2005]

 potluck



tiny check Just because we’re trying to be less judgmental around here, doesn’t mean we eyeChart

don’t appreciate the return of Lawyers Behaving Badly at Declarations & Exclusions

George Wallace reports on a case confirming the reasonable notion that judicial officers 

have no immunity to commit battery, and — in a post including a great explanation

of “Selective Literalism Syndrome[SLS] — he reminds us that lawyers should not try

to take advantage of a typo when it the intended meaning of the document is clear.

tiny check Breaking Google Search News:  (1) We’re pleased to not that assembly agita

is now cached and part of the Google Search system!!  There are only two results —

our post originating the phrase from two days ago, and our rather gratuitous trackback

ping that day to Crime & Federalism.  Feel free to enlarge the result pool.

 

(2)  Someone searched for perception of expertise> at Yahoo!, and  #1 out of over

3.5 million results was our April 2004 post Selling the Perception of Expertise, which

explained further our qualms over “turnkey” weblogs, such as the then-new services

from LexBlog.  It’s a good thing perception is everything.

 

“tinyredcheck”  Ann Althouse points to a very interesting post at the Eide Neurolearning Weblog,

which asks what blogging could be doing for our brains.  The post concludes:


“Blogging combines the best of solitary reflection and social interaction.

cricketGH “Research using the Lemelson-MIT Invention index found that invention 

is best fostered in solitude (66%); yet other research has shown the beneficial

effects of brainstorming with a community of intellectual peers. So blogging

may combine the best of “working by yourself” and “working with other people.”

Bloggers have solitary time to plan their posts, but they can also receive rapid

feedback on their ideas. The responses may open up entirely new avenues of

thought as posts circulate and garner comments.

“In conclusion, it looks as if blogging will be very good for our brains. It holds

enormous potential in education, and it could take societal communication and

creative exchange onto a whole new level.”

 I agree that the potential is there.  As with other revolutionary media — such

as the printing press and television — it all depends on the execution.  [See the

Supplement (dated 10-10-03) to our post “does the blogosphere exist?”]


                                                                                                                                                             cricketG

 

 

friedman & callahan: even better together

Filed under: pre-06-2006 — David Giacalone @ 5:57 pm

We’ve talked about authors Kinky Friedman (here) and John Callahan (here) before. Yesterday evening, I had the you-nique pleasure of enjoying the prose of the ex-country-singer-mystery-writer (Friedman) in a new book that also features the work of “our most famous, most wickedly-funny paralyzed cartoonist” (Callahan).

KinkyHoldEm It’s the Kinkster’s newest non-fiction book. Texas Hold ‘Em: How I Was Born in a Manger, Died in the Saddle, and Came Back as a Horny Toad(St. Martin’s Press, 2005). As a reviewer for the El Paso Times put it, Texas Hold ‘Em is: “another Kinky Friedman classic: quirky and full of Texas trivia.” Ramon Renter’a adds:

“Friedman writes about anything and everything Texas: riding the tour bus with Willie Nelson, witnessing the changing landscape in the Texas Hill Country, growing up in Houston in the ’50s, and why Austin City Limits never aired his concert.

“As expected, Friedman uses the book to publicize his independent bid to be the next governor of Texas in 2006.

“As with previous Kinky Friedman books, you will read this book quickly, smiling and sometimes laughing as if you’ve had too many shots of tequila. And as the Kinkster likes to say: ‘If the horse dies, get off.’ “

The Kinkster insists that both Molly Ivins and George W. Bush are behind his 2006 gubernatorial candidacy. (Bill Clinton is a big fan, too, but can’t vote in Texas). Since Texas governors don’t do any “heavy lifting,” Kinky figues he could do “some spiritual lifting” — with the reminder that “the best things in life aren’t things.” He also vows “to fight the wussification” of Texas.

KinkyHoldEmN


Friedman also claims that lawyers come in droves to his book signing gigs (and he often signs “May all your juries be well hung.”). His chapter “Ardor in the Court” focuses on “the legendary defense lawyer Racehorse Haynes,” who appears to be a big Kinky fan (but seems to have no website). (You can see part of the original Texas Monthly article here, including a good quip from a Racehorse protege, David Berg.)

tiny check To be honest, I had never heard of Richard “Racehorse” Haynes.However, through a little Googling, I found Mike Cernovich quoting him in a Comment at The Legal Underground, so Haynes’ pedigree passes muster with me.


Kinky Friedman is 58 (but reads at the 60-year-old level). The Chapter titledf “I Don’t” — on why he prefers to remain unmarried and childless — is worth thefprice of the book (mine’s borrowed from the Schenectady Public Library), andfI suggest you take up Amazon’s offer and look inside it, to enjoy a samplingffrom “I Don’t” and other chapters.

CallahanBest

I can’t end this post without a tip of the hat to cartoonist John Callahan. I stayed up late, flipping through various volumes of his work that I located on my dusty shelves and had smile after guilty smile. Here’s one of my favorites.

restrooms p.s. I always enjoy sharing a laugh, and last night I exposed a friend of mine for the first time to both Kinky and Callahan. Our laugh muscles were aching by the time it became too dark out to see the pages. When I met this women 15 years ago, she would have never laughed at such silly “male” humor. I was about to take credit for her broadened horizons, when I got the sneaking suspicion that the years and our friendship now make it acceptable for her to let on that she enjoys bawdy and sick humor, too. I’d hate to think that over all these decades, women have actually “gotten” all the jokes we guys assumed went over their heads.

Kobayashi Issa would surely have loved Kinky and Callahan. Find a couple dozen of his haiku on laughter, here:

a flea jumps

in the laughing Buddha’s

mouth

the cricket

“Cricky! Cricky!”

laughing by himself

laugh at my piss flyswatter horiz

and shudder. . .

katydid

swat! swat!

the escaping fly buzzes

with laughter

jumping aside

the crow just laughs . . .

snowball

cricketGH Kobayashi Issa

translated by David G. Lanoue

August 18, 2005

up to my ankles

Filed under: pre-06-2006 — David Giacalone @ 7:06 pm

Here are a few reasons why I became a haiku advocate  —

by a modern master, jim kacian:

 

 

 

just now
as my life turns crazy
forsythia

 

 

 

 





ground fog
up to my ankles
in moonlight


 


 










“sunLakeFrameG”


 


tidepool
the stars sink
into the sand


 


 


the river
         the river makes
   of the moon


 


 


 






city morning
a crane lifts its shadow
up the wall


 


 


 


spotlight


 


in concert
the violin soloist
and his shadows


 



 




 










six ducks

on a river log —

seven dawdlers


 [Aug. 18, 2005]                     

 

 

 

 

 


potluck        


I had to smile today, when I read Steve Bainbridge‘s

self-proclaimed “rant”, which includes:


“this is probably what bugs me most about some

liberals: smug self-satisfaction in their own moral

superiority.” 

This from a man who has repeatedly asserted that it is

impossible to have a strong moral code or sense of social

responsibility outside of a religious context.  And, who

believes his own Church has the definitive answer to

every moral question.   Maybe that old psychological

saw is true — we most dislike in others what we most

dislike about ourselves.   However,  I have promised

myself I would steer clear of controversy and judgment-

alism for the duration of this weblog, so I shall end this

blurb — and try a little introspection. 

 

 

                                                                                                                                         SunBeachFrameG

 

    


 

August 17, 2005

the razor wire glints

Filed under: pre-06-2006 — David Giacalone @ 7:32 pm




maddening heat
      the cicada still singing
      in the crow’s beak

 

 

 

 

 

 






Prison fence:
the razor wire glints
with first light

 

 

 

 

 

A fresh bouquet
at the gravestone with the name
worn away

 


 


“A fresh bouquet” & “Prison fence” – Simply Haiku (Sept. 2003, I:3)

“maddening heat” – The Heron’s Nest (editor’s choice, Feb. 2002)

 










bathtub cricket,

where do you go

while I shower?

 

[Aug. 17, 2005]  

potluck



trashman small Ann Althouse asks “Do the departing college kids just

throw all their crap at the curb in your town?”  They apparently do it 

everywhere.  If you have to be a curmudgeon to complain about 

it, then call me curmudgeonEsq!  As usual, I wonder why so many

teachers, parents and advocates want to make excuses for so-called

adult students — and ask so little of them.

 

 

                                                                                             trashman small flip 

“assembly agita”

Filed under: pre-06-2006 — David Giacalone @ 4:05 pm

Although most of our dads were quite handy around

the house, a lot of my Italo-American male friends

are tool-challenged — as are my law colleagues.  So,

I was a little surprised that the phrase “assembly agita

yielded no results in a Google search.  This post is

meant to cure that oversight.  [I think I’ll throw in

assembly angst,” too.]

 

The subject was on my mind, because my twin  computer weary

brother came home yesterday from a colonoscopy

(with good results, thank you) to find that the brand

new computer system had arrived for his at-home

law office.  Being a solo with no staff, setting up his

computer will be his sole responsibility — unless his

(much more handy) spouse has mercy on him.  He’s

also switching from dial-up to DSL.   You don’t have

to have twinnie telepathy to feel a bit of empathy for

his plight.

 

Good luck, Bro’.  I’m three hundred miles away,

and feel better knowing that I’d only be in the way,

if I showed up to “help”.



  • I wish Ann, Eugene, or Michael, would figure

    out a way to assert our constitutional 

    right Peaceably to Assemble. 


 


Naturally, dagosan had a few thoughts on this subject:


 


 







“easy to assemble
I put it back and
grab a teddybear



 

 

 

first night on campus —

mom’s gone 

and the bed’s still in its box

 







 

holy family

 

 

 

setting up the creche —

the Baby’s name

whispered over and over

 

 

 dagosan [Aug. 17, 2005]

 

 

p.s. To my haijin friends:  If you have haiku or senryu to

contribute on this topic, please send them along via the

comment box or email.

 






living in harmony —

sparrows in the eaves also

set up house

 

              ISSA, translated by David G. Lanoue

 

 

better late

Filed under: pre-06-2006 — David Giacalone @ 12:53 am

I apologize for posting our daily haiku so late today. 

Prof. Yabut monopolized my keyboard all day.

 

I’m pleased to announce that five of f/k/a’s Honored Guests   announcer

have been honored in the 9th Mainichi International Haiku Contest (2005)

 

Second Prizes in the International (English) section went to:

 

 


winter night
firemen coil
smoke-scented rope

 

        john stevenson

 

 

 

 

 






a long fly ball
arcs above the moon
summer deepens

 

         ed markowski 

 

Honorable Mention went to:

 


fading stars—
something of my father
in the bobwhite’s call


         peggy lyles 


 


 








dry air—
the dog shaking off
the ocean


       gary hotham


 


plum gathering
through thick branches
pieces of sky


        roberta beary


 


daylilyG  For your late-night enjoyment, I also want to point out that the

Autumn 2005 edition of Simply Haiku journal is now available online. It

presents haiku and other short-form Japanese poetry by many fine haijin,

including five haiku each by two friends of f/k/a — the ubiquitous and

prolific Ed Markowski and the always-curious Bret Wooldridge (who has

a wife and 6 daughters, but still doesn’t know what women want).

 

Here’s another gem from Mr. Markowski, first published at

tinywords (May 20, 2004):

 






morning moon
the nooks and crannies
of an english muffin


 


 






  • by dagosan                                               



after the rain —

a three-quarter moon

over the closed five-n-dime

 

 

[Aug. 16, 2005]

 

 

 

 potluck



boxerSignN Things got a little rowdy today over at the Legal Underground cafe. 

Evan’s regulars got a bit worked up over Ted and Walter‘s take on the Stella

Awards and the related L.A. Times series. 

 

 

                                                                                                                           infielderG

 

August 16, 2005

1L of a decision

Filed under: lawyer news or ethics,viewpoint — David Giacalone @ 9:16 pm

[Welcome Blawg Review #22 visitors; see the sequel: the road to “L” is paved with inattention]

Although Prof. Yabut is on sabbatical, he asked us to post a few of his
customarily-crusty sentiments for the edification of new law students.
[They were prompted by an inquiry yesterday from Prof. Rick Garnett,
via Leiter.]

1L of a Decision

Because we’re all adults, I’m going to be totally frank in this short homily to prof yabut small flip
new law students: Your decision to attend law school is very likely to be one
of the riskiest you will ever make in and for your life. Law school will test your
stamina
and your sanity, leave you with a mountain of debt, and prepare you
(some say rather poorly) for a profession that is universally disliked, and is rife
with
dissatisfied, self-loathing and depressed individuals, who feel helpless to
redeem their lives and selfesteem. (see, e.g., the discussion
here and here)

His clients’ experiences have made lawyer and career counselor Ronald W. Fox
angry every time he hears the words “law school.” He explains
:

“They entered law school with confidence, talents, smarts, dreams
of justice and high hopes and left three years later with few legal
skills, limited awareness of the values of the profession, little knowledge
of the range of options for a career, not a clue about how to look for work
and a mountain of debt. They were transformed into cynical individuals
with a false, narrowed perspective of their choices and a dramatically
reduced sense of self-worth.”

As we reported last year, lawyer-author Steven Keeva has made a similar
observation:


“Recent research demonstrates how a majority of first-year students
who come to school with an inner motivational focus—that is, a desire
to help others, make the world a better place and so on—move rather
rapidly to an external focus, such as earning a lot of money or impressing
others. Such shifts typically coincide with plummeting levels of well-being[.]”


[The study, “Does Legal Education Have Negative Effects on Law Students?
Evaluating Changes in Motivation, Values and Well-Being”, by professors
Kennon Sheldon and Lawrence Krieger, was published in Behavioral Sciences
and Law, and may be viewed here.]

boy writing If you did the Homework we suggested last Spring, you already knew the
risks, and you’ve done your best to minimize them by figuring out your own motivations,
adding up the true cost, assessing realistic job options if saddled with large debt,
and seeking out unbiased and experienced opinions about law practice. But, if
you’re among the multitude who didn’t do the soul-searching and legwork necessary
to choose law school intelligently, you better start doing them now. Yes, now, despite
all the other pressures of 1L life.

Why now? Because (1) the entire law school experience should be geared toward
deciding whether law is the right career for you (not your parents or friends!); (2) if the
answer ends up being “no,” you need to cut your losses as soon as possible; (3) if
the answer — after really working on the question — turns out to be “yes,” you will
have both a great sense of relief and a reassuring sense of direction for your legal
career; and (4) self-assessment about your career in the law should be a perennial
task, to help assure you’ll get the most out of it, while being prepared for a wide variety
of possibly upsetting surprises.

Derek Haskew presents what might be the best reason to start your self-assessment
— asking who you are and what you want from a law degree and the legal profession —
as soon as possible:

“[T]he person you are before you enter law school is certain to be different
from the one who leaves three years later. Given that, the question becomes,
what part of you do you wish to have around to celebrate at graduation?

“In retrospect, it is easy to see how nearly anyone who is accepted can
graduate from law school. The challenge is in not being changed so much
by the experience that you forget why you went there in the first place.”

I’m not trying to scare you, as you start law school. But, I do want you to feel very
uncomfortable if you are unable to say that you’re sure you want to be a lawyer,
that you know yourself well enough to know your career goals (or at least your
bedrock values), and that you’ve thought through the practical issues surrounding
graduating with a large amount of debt (if you will likely have that burden).


podiumSN Please don’t think that there are no satisfied lawyers.
For example, see here, here and there. I think many of the
satisfied are the kind of folk who would find a way to be
content almost anywhere. Unfortunately, most of us tend
to be easily disappointed and frustrated. We need to try
harder to avoid career angst and burnout.

There are some excellent web resources for law students who are trying to find out
who they are and what they want in a career. The Decision Books Law Student Page
is very good place to start, with many free exercises to help with career assessment.
The Values Inventory might even be a good parlor game for friends on a weekend night —
letting you sort out and prioritize values, and hear the choices and commentary of your
fellow students.

Many college websites have an excellent Pre-Law Advisor, that was put together by
Notre Dame’s Ava Preacher and uses helpful input from career counselor and lawyer-
author Deborah Arron. Note that there is only One Good Reason to go to law school:
You Want to Be a Lawyer (and actually know what that means). Take a look at the
Things to Ponder” list of characteristics of contented lawyers and of those who might
be ill-suited for the legal profession. Be honest with yourself about how those lists
make you feel as a law student. [check our Homework posting for more sources; and take a look at Ron Fox’s materials on choosing a law school.]

tiny check No, none of these tools and exercises will spoon-feed
you answers and remedies. Sorry, it will take focused attention
and continuing commitment.

Don’t be surprised if you start wondering whether you’ve made a bad choice. Listen to
your gut and your heart. Cutting your losses is a lot better than “investing” in a career
and lifestyle that will make you (and your loved ones) miserable. If you think you need
more time to discover whether a lawyer’s life is the right one for you, consider asking
for a leave of absence (after completing your semester or year). Most schools will
be supportive.

penny smDerek Haskew‘s 1L of a Challenge, deserves special mention. Part of Steve Keeva’s Transforming Practices website [update: most content has been removed from the site, so links in this paragraph are outdated; Keeva’s book might be a good substitute], 1L of a Challenge focuses
on “Staying Healthy and Whole in Law School.” It has columns, Q&A
interviews, and occasional news on innovative approaches to humanizing
legal education. It’s a gem, and I was shocked that a Technorati search
turned up only one (very moribund) weblog link to 1L of a Challenge. Check
out
Security v. Acclaim, The Challenge of the Public Interest Fiction,
Should I go to Law School?, and Going to Law School, or Just Going Broke?

For another useful book see Should You Really Be a Lawyer?, by D. Schneider and G. Belsky (2004).

Rhymes with Google: While you’re in school and deciding your place penny sm penny over
in the legal profession, there is one very important way to lower your risk and any
losses: Be Frugal — not to mention
sparing, thrifty, and economical. This probably
sounds even more difficult than discovering the real you, but it is essential that you
keep your debt as low as possible, in order to keep your options as open as possible.
(See “Haskew’s “
Going Broke?” , and Sherry Fowler’s comment, with my reply, about
getting into and avoiding law school debt). After graduation, it is far too easy to allow
“golden handcuffs” caused by high mortgages and lifestyle/family “necessities” to
become manacles that keep you from finding a fulfilling career and balanced lifestyle.
Getting in the habit of making “sacrifices” (which are in fact far from draconian) is not
a lot to expect of responsible young adults.

As I told Scheherazade in a comment two years ago:

handcuffsG “To be honest, it seems to me that those handcuffs are self-imposed.
The key to releasing the cuffs is deciding that a less expensive lifestyle is
acceptable — including less expensive neighborhood and home, auto,
wardrobe, vacations, hobbies, and social life. It sounds like a rather flimsy
excuse for someone who does not yet have a family to support to say,
‘I want to use my degree to change the world, but my debt is too high.’

“Maybe I should blame my generation of middle-class Baby Boomers for
raising, on the whole, a generation of children who feel entitled to most of
the amenities of a successful middle-class lifestyle, even when first entering
their careers [and while still students!]”

Commentators such as LSF‘s John Steele scoffed at the article “Javanomics 101:
Today’s Coffee is Tomorrow’s Debt” (WashPost, June 18, 2005). In our
blurb, we
stated:

“John’s right that expensive coffee alone does not create the massive
law-student debt that so limits career choices. However, it is a very
representative symbol for a generation whose spending habits are so
impractical and unnecessarily expensive, that they price themselves out
of a lot of career options.”

If you take a hatchet to those living expenses — especially entertainment and
meals outside of your home — you just might have an extra hundred dollars or two
a month for life’s true necessities once it’s time to pay back those loans.

I want to end with a bit of tough love, by repeating a message for law students
from New Jersey Appellate Judge Jose L. Fuentes: If law isn’t your passion, get out of
law school! More expansively, Judge Fuentes pleads (emphasis added):

To all these unfortunate souls: to the perpetual child, to the risk manager, to
the ambitious social climber, to the mindless would-be robo-lawyer, I have but
one [piece of] advice: GET OUT! Get out now while you can still leave with
your soul intact.
Do not allow life to catch you from behind, one day when you
least expected and are least capable of resisting.

Get out now and rediscover yourself. Ask the hard questions that you avoided
asking when your parents told everyone that their child was going to be a lawyer.
Ask, who am I? Not what am I going to do? [At] no other time in your life are
you ever going to be as free as you are right now to make these hard choices and
then act upon them.



Well, you’ve got you’re foot in the door of the legal profession. Now, make sure it’s the
right door — and that you have an exit strategy.

Best wishes, from the Old Professor

update (Sept. 4, 2005): Don’t miss the sequel, the road to “L” is paved with inattention

baby sparrow
so quickly you’ve learned
to eat and rut

introducing their children
to society…
strutting sparrows



Kobayashi ISSA, translated by David G. Lanoue

admissions week-

two fat envelopes

and two skinny ones

……………………………………. dagosan

prairie twilight…

the glow of the cattleman’s

branding iron

………………….. Ed Markowski


during discussion

on the meaning of life . . . the crunch

of a student’s apple


George Swede



boy writing neg

August 15, 2005

despite the development

Filed under: pre-06-2006 — David Giacalone @ 3:46 pm

 


A haiku break with Tom Clausen is always worthwhile:

 

 

 

 

boardwalk-
we go to one end
then the other

 

 

type=”cite”>





 


 

 

 


       on the wall
   Jesus on the cross
above her side of the bed

 

 

 

 



 

despite
       the development
                              deer path

 

 

 








 



long wait alone
in the parking lot…
a dog in the next car

type=”cite”>
 

 

 

 

 


 

out my childhood window
         tree sihouettes
           grown up


 

 



 






  • by dagosan                                               



shopping for sweet corn —

the attractive stranger

is very choosy

 

[Aug. 15, 2005]

 

 

 

 potluck


tiny check  Both Ted and Walter at Overlawyered.com are taking on the L.A. Times series over the 

source of the Stella Awards and other “tall tales of outrageous jury awards.” The Times

mentions in particular the infamous (and very funny) “Winnebago cruise control lawsuit”

urban legend, suggesting that the tort reform movement is based on false tales like that one. 

Like Walter, I wonder whether the Times has attempted to find the source of the original

Winnebago tale and Stella Awards.  I’d love to know.  There is no doubt, from my own

experience, that the Stellas are believed to be factual by millions of Americans — and used

to show (1) how stupid homo sapiens can be, and (2) the need to curb frivolous lawsuits.

I can’t wait to see what Evan Schaeffer thinks of this tiff.

 

tiny check Overlawyered honcho Walter Olson is hoping Russell Crowe throws a phone at  . . .  “phoneRingingS”

Walter Olson.   Of course, the hypolitigious Mr. O wouldn’t even think of suing, even  

though hotel porter Nestor Estrada will apparently receive millions of dollars in settlement

from the impulse-challenged Mr. Crowe

 

dogFanN  With their usual panache, Patent Baristas presented a piping hot Blawg Review #19 

today — and we, um, borrowed their really cool dog-fan pix.

 



 

August 14, 2005

sunday visit with yu chang

Filed under: pre-06-2006 — David Giacalone @ 3:07 pm

 

 

 







Sunday morning —

humming a tune

my mother taught me

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

GOOD MORNING

she walks in

with daffodils

 

 

 

 

 








nesting season

I drift

a little closer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


quiet water

an orange carp emerges

between the clouds

 

 

parkBench Yu Chang from Upstate Dim Sum (2004/II)

 



 




  • by dagosan                                               









sunday night rain —

the church lady curses

headlights with halos

 

[Aug. 14, 2005]

 

 

August 13, 2005

first kisses and brain freezes

Filed under: pre-06-2006 — David Giacalone @ 7:19 pm

more summer rain

an origami stork appears

on her fingertips

blackberry pie

steaming on the window sill

blue morning moon

 

first kiss

deep in the woods

sunbeams filter down

 

piepieceN

… by Randy Brooks from School’s Out (Press Here, 1999)

 

lemon-ice stand —

the lawyer-dad looks for

a Brain Freeze Warning

[Aug. 13, 2005]

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress