You are viewing a read-only archive of the Blogs.Harvard network. Learn more.

f/k/a archives . . . real opinions & real haiku

December 14, 2004

deck the hall

Filed under: pre-06-2006 — David Giacalone @ 11:35 am

The haiku of Carolyn Hall need no decoration, and we are most pleased      joy neg

that they will be frequently adorning this weblog starting today.  Although

she first became aquainted with haiku five years ago, Carolyn has been winning

so many haiku awards (e.g., from Heron’s Nest) that we can’t possibly list

them all.   You can read almost any fine haiku journal and find examples

of her work and honors (i.e., frogpond).

 

I’ll let Carolyn introduce herself, and then start with a trio of her haiku, which

the editors of Red Moon Press say “delivers to the reader a sense of comfort

sought and, ultimately, found.”


Carolyn says: “Originally a Minnesota girl, I have lived in San Francisco

since the early 60s. After a checkered career that included stints in histology,

mutual funds, advertising and child-rearing, I finally quit my day job as a

graphic designer and copy editor in order to take up creative writing, especially

memoir and short fiction. Five years ago a friend introduced me to haiku, and I

became totally addicted to the heightened sense of awareness haiku brought

to my life – an addiction I have no desire to break.”

 


(Red Moon Press, 2001)


 

spilt milk

spreading along the grout lines

morning chill

 








first night home from college

click of the latch

on her bedroom door

 

hand in hand–

how slowly

the creek meanders

 

 


credits” “spilt milk” – Heron’s Nest 11:5

           “hand in hand” – Modern Haiku XXXI:2

 




  • by dagosan (humbler than ever following Carolyn)




winter wind

rattles the windows –

the fridge hums louder

 

                                   [Dec. 14, 2004]


 

one-breath pundit





  • I had a number of  barbed blurbs for this morning, but I don’t want to ruin the
    joy of Carolyn Hall joining our Honored Guests.  In the spirit of this gift-giving

    season, however, I will note again that the medicant professor is still seeking

    your charity (and offering authographed [overstocked?] books). 




  • Well, I can’t resist one question:  Is this tale a good example of the blessings    crusade ship flip

    we can all expect from faith-based law schools and legal theory? [prior skepticism]



 

December 13, 2004

lani guinier could clear this up

Filed under: pre-06-2006 — David Giacalone @ 11:57 pm

Earlier today, Eugene Volokh echoed David Kravitz‘s complaint that the “mainstream press”

has apparently falsely accused Harvard Law Prof. Lani Guinier of failing to pay Social Security

taxes for a domestic worker in her employ.  They decry the irresponsible, sloppy journalism and

suggest it means the mainstream press can’t be trusted on other issues.   Both cover their butts

by asking to be corrected, if they are wrong about the facts from 1993.

 

journalist A few things bother me about this:



  • Eugene and David make strong accusations without knowing the facts with certainty —

    they base them on their personal recollection from 11 years ago of what would have been

    a secondary issue for Guinier.   Based on memory, Kravitz decries Total Incompetence.



  • they are willing to tar the entire mainstream press, when — as with webloggers — some

    journalists are far more careful than others; and




  • they could have held their (ideologically or politically loosened?) tongues until they got

    more definitive information: from Prof. Guinier herself or the assailled reporters.

1993 being the Dark Ages as far as online newspaper resources, I have not been able to confirm

the facts here, either.  I did find, however, the following excerpt in Prof. Guinier’s book Lift Every Voice :

 Turning a Civil Rights Setback Into a New Vision of Social Justice (1998).  At page 36, she is describing

the very first press conference after her nomination was announced, and she says (emphasis added):



” the weight of my description of how prior administrations had tolerated actual examples

of intentional discrimination was more than the reporters wanted to hear that day.   Afterwards,

my fellow nominees thanked me for what they took as a filibuster. From their perspective, I had 

successfully distracted the press, whose interest in nonpayment of Social Security taxes could

not regain momentum”

So, the issue was out there, although I do not know the context and Guinier does not broach the topic

again in the book.  Prof. Volokh tells me that no articles that he has found from 1993 mention the tax issue.

It would be great if Prof. Guinier (who is still very good at getting press coverage) could help us all with the facts — if the mainstream press doesn’t dig out some quotes by their morning editions to silence the gleeful naysayers.

 

update (Dec. 14, 2004): Prof. Volokh points to a Correction in today’s Washington Post that states:


“A Dec. 12 article incorrectly said that Lani Guinier’s nomination to head the Justice Department’s

civil rights division under President Bill Clinton was withdrawn because of a “nanny problem.”

There was no such problem, and the Clinton White House withdrew the nomination because of controversy over Guinier’s legal writings.”

 

(Dec. 15, 2004, 3 PM): Newsday issued the following Correction this afternoon:




 

By The Associated Press

December 15, 2004, 1:42 PM EST

 

In a Dec. 10 brief and story about Bernard Kerik’s withdrawal as homeland security secretary-designate, The Associated Press reported erroneously that Lani Guinier, who was President Clinton’s choice to head the Justice Department’s civil rights division in 1993, had not paid taxes for a domestic worker. A spokesman for her at Harvard Law School said there was no such problem, and the White House never indicated that there was. Clinton said he withdrew her nomination because of her legal writings on racial issues. The same incorrect reference to Guinier and unpaid taxes on a domestic worker was in a 1995 AP item about Clinton choices who had problems in the confirmation process.


  • update (Dec. 16, 2004): The Philadephia Inquirer issued this erratum on Guinier today: “In some editions of Sunday’s Inquirer, the Associated Press erroneously included Lani Guinier on a list of high-level White House nominees who had run into problems involving hired help. Guinier’s problems stemmed from her writings on racial issues.”  See here for the text of numerous Corrections and Letters by Prof. Guinier.

  •  


                                                                                                                                                                          journalist f             

    New Year’s Day
    nothing to report…
    trashy house





    honest and true
    rustling in the wind…
    river shrine boats

     ISSA, translated by David G. Lanoue        
           


        

    noiseless wind (would be nice)

    Filed under: pre-06-2006 — David Giacalone @ 11:57 am


      silent dawn

    the bird’s nest

      full of snow

     

     

     






        noiseless wind

           icicles pend

    from the bell clappers

     

     

     



    (Katsura/Red Moon Press, 1996).

     






    birthday phone call –

    your triple bypass

    trumps my bad knee

     

                                                [Dec. 13, 2004]

    one-breath pundit




    •  The Arrogant Nanny Set:  I’m never surprised, but always appalled, to see that so many
      people in the legal profession (and law enforcement, like Bernard Kerik) are so willing to

      violate immigration and tax laws to get cheap child care services — even at risk of foiling

      future high office.  For lawyers, I think it’s behavior that deserves disbarment. The poor

      working stiff and honest taxpayer get to subsidize these arrogant ninnies.


    • Mitch Albom and Rochelle Riley of the Detroit Free Press each had good columns

      yesterday about children and parents and telephonic privacy.  (see our blurb

      yesterday)  Let’s hope the Washington high court’s triumph of children’s privacy

      rights over parental obligations and rights leads to better, truly “family friendly” laws.






    • I like the TaxProf’s idea for reducing the number of lawyers — let the males use laptops

      for exams (to reduce fertility).  I’m also pleased to see that the best and the brightest of

      our young folk may be moving away from law as a profession to areas where they will

      be more productive and, hopefully, happier with their career choices. 





    • Mike at Crime & Federalism asks visitors to share law school exam horror storiesambulance

      I left a Comment that might bring a couple guys with straight-jackets to my door.

    December 12, 2004

    snow down my neck

    Filed under: pre-06-2006 — David Giacalone @ 4:32 pm







    first date

        letting her

    put snow down my neck

     

     

     

    welch11Breast  full size photo & haiku 

     

     

    my hand curves

           to fit your breast …

    the windowsill, snowladen

     

     

     



    “my hand curves” – from Open Window, haiku and photographs  


     



    by dagosan:  




    warm enough 
    to linger at the river 
    year-end bonus
                            
     [dag, Dec. 30, 2003]

     

    one-breath pundit


    tiny check So, Italian judges have discretion to shorten statutes of limitation

    and used it on behalf of Prime Minister Berlusconi (who just happens to be

    the richest man in the country).  Thank you, dear grandparents, for taking the

    boat to the New World. (NYT article, “All Corruption Charges Against Berlusconi

    Are Dismissed,” Dec. 11, 2004)

     

     The other David Giacalone is alleged to have “received a personal  

    payment of more than $300,000–which Fininvest insists was a ‘consulting

    fee’ but which magistrates consider a bribe” for his part in having the so-

    called Mammi Law enacted favoring Berlusoni’s media empire. (The Nation,

     “Emperor of the Air,” Nov. 11, 1999) [even The Nation misspells our name!]

    p.s. I just learned today that Giacalone’s website policamente scorretto means

    “politically incorrect” in Italian. 

     

    tiny checkOn the other hand, did you hear that 16-year-old Steve Geluso flunked his Language Arts class      fail gray s

    at Richland High?  Asked to “Write a three-part compare/contrast essay that explores the similarities

    and/or differences between two items on any topic,” Steve choose to distinguish between piracy and

    stealing.  His teacher deemed the essay (transcribed here) to be “Really splitting hairs on reasoning why

    it’s OK to take music if it is offered to you.” Steve’s story was picked up by boingboing, Donna Wentworth,

    and many more.  As in Election 2004, nuance is apparently a vice, not a virtue.

     

    pass

     

    tiny checkNeed a gift idea for a particularly nervous and anxious friend?  Why not Fredd Culbertson’s Phobic List

    poster?  The list is fun and entertaining.  For instance, here are the first handful of items under Letter B:


    FEAR of:

     

    Bacteria– Bacteriophobia.
    Bald people– Peladophobia.
    Bald, becoming– Phalacrophobia.
    Bathing– Ablutophobia.
    Beards– Pogonophobia.
    Beaten by a rod or instrument of punishment, or of being severely criticized- Rhabdophobia.
    Beautiful women– Caligynephobia.
    Beds or going to bed- Clinophobia.

     

    tiny check  Evan Schaeffer (and others, like the Washington Post, and the St. Louis Post-Dispatch)

    have exposed the Madison County Record newspaper to be partly owned by the tort-reformers at the 

    Chamber of Commerce.  Perhaps, in addition to Evan’s call for a frontpage disclosure of the ownership,

    the rag could change its name to the Madison County Chamber Pot.

     


    wintry weather

    the meaning of “parent”

    sinks in

                      ISSA, translated by David G. Lanoue     

     

     

    phone old   J. Craig Williams at MIPTC has it right: the Washington State Supreme Court’s silly decision

    criminalizing a parent’s eavesdropping on a minor child’s telephone conversation should not discourage

    other parents from listening in when the child’s welfare needs to be protected.  The ACLU’s lawyer, Douglas

    Klunder, says “I don’t think the state should be in the position of encouraging parents to act surreptitiously

    and eavesdrop on their children.”  [That reminds me of the “children’s rights” extremists who argued a decade

    ago that NYS lawyers appointed to represent children must solely advocate the position desired by any

    child able to “express” a position (e.g., in a custody or abuse cases).]  There is a lot of room between the state

    “encouraging” more parental eavesdropping and the state declaring it a criminal invasion of privacy.

    December 11, 2004

    The Musty Money Mob — Skoog v. Casadei

    Filed under: Schenectady Synecdoche — David Giacalone @ 10:52 pm

    update (March 25, 2008) See “getting his musty money back” [which includes a Dec. 2009 follow-up detailing the federal prosecution of Michael Cassadei for mortgage fraud; also see the update at the end of this posting].

    update (Dec. 29, 2007): Like a musty odor in the basement, this saga continues to haunt our judicial system. See “Trial set in case of cash in the wall” (Daily Gazette, by Steven Cook, Dec. 29, 2007).

    help with mistakes An article that appeared today in my hometown Schenectady, NY, newspaper, is a ready-made, multi-subject law exam question for students, professors or lawyers wanting to show off their issue-spotting skills. It’s a tale that leads one to ask: “Is there intelligent life in this once prosperous home of Thomas Edison, GE, and legal giants?” (Daily Gazette, “$200K in cash found in wall has 3 claimants: Smelly money later buried in Tupperware,” by Stephen Cook, Dec. 11, 2004, p. A1, A8)

    You decide, while spotting issues of law, equity, ethics, etc. Here’s an outline of the facts (according to the newspaper account):

    In October, 2003, home owner (and landlord, entrepeneur) Michael Casadei wanted a better security system for his residence, in the City’s Historic Stockade District. He gave the job to a man who called himself Kevin Graham, although “Graham” (who was later identified as Kevin Skoog) “could provide no references or other credentials” and said he had just arrived in town from North Carolina and “was down on his luck.”

    As Skoog worked in the Casadei basement, “he came across some loose bricks, behind which he found a bag,” that Skoog recalls contained “stacks and stacks of hundred dollar bills” that smelled old and looked old.

    pointerDudeNegS Skoog says Casadei told him the house had once been the home of Marvin Friedman, who died more than a decade ago, and who was the “founder and former owner of the venerable Van Dyck Restaurant” [and jazz club, which the MacDonald family reopened in June 2009], which is located next to the residence. Skoog insists Casadei confided that Friedman might have hidden money in the house.

    Skoog concluded the money wasn’t Casadei’s, he told authorities, and decided it was his to take. According to the Gazette, because Casadei had only owned the house for four months, Skoog’s attorney Paul M. Callahan “questioned how the cash could get so smelly and musty in such a short period of time.”

    Skoog is also quoted as feeling “blessed,” and “promptly went on a spending spree, buying a new motorcycle, a used SUV, another car, rings and other items.” Schenectady County Sheriff Harry Buffardi notes “He was spending like a drunken sailor.”

    Casadei immediately realized the money was missing and, rather than contacting the police, hired a private investigator, who learned “Graham”‘s real identity. There was an outstanding warrant for Skoog in Monroe County, NY, for felony weapons possession (for which Skoog has since served one year). Casadei went to the Sheriff and gave him information that turned out to be correct as to the amount of money and who had it. Skoog was arrested, turned over about $20,000 hidden under a carpet in his apartment, and took the authorities to a tree in a nearby woods, where he had buried over $100,000 in $100 bills in Tupperware.

    past due Casadei offered not to press charges if the money were returned, but Skoog claimed ownership and was charged with one count of second-degree criminal possession of stolen property, a felony. However, Skoog was not indicted within the required six months, and charges were dropped.

    Buffardi, “with a total of $130,000 in smelly, musty $100 bills sitting around, deposited the money in the bank by summer” of 2004. Wanting his money back, Casadei sued in the local Supreme [trial] Court. “Apparently without a clear accounting of the bills, Friedman’s heirs and Skoog filed their own claims on the cash.”

    As of Friday, Dec. 10, 2004, neither Sheriff Buffardi nor attorneys for the three parties believed that photographs of the bills existed.

    But photos were discovered Friday afternoon as Buffardi went through the criminal file with a reporter.

    “Thirteen stacks of cash are visible in the evidence photo. Twelve of them are topped with large, offset portraits of Benjamin Franklin, meaning that these ‘Benjamins’ were produced no earlier than 1996.

    pointerDudeNegS Counsel for the Friedman heirs, Albany attorney Harlan Harrison, expressed surprise when hearing about the existence of a photograph of the money, saying “If that’s true, that would be important.” He declined to discuss the implications.

    Skoog’s attorney, Callahan, said the photo doesn’t explain who put the cash there or where it’s been since 1996. Callahan points to a case from the 1960s, where a plumber found $5000 behind a toilet in a home in Buffalo, NY, and the money was awarded to the plumber, not the homeowner.

    Casadei’s attorney, Adam G. Parisi, says that case doesn’t apply and the photo negates the other claims to his client’s money, although a final resolution could take as long as a year. Casadei states that people “that don’t have any scruples . . . want to try and steal my money.”

    The Gazette article notes:

    The money, the 49-year-old Casadei said, is proceeds from his real estate work. It was there because of his aversion to banks, he said. He has since changed that practice.

    sleuth Schenectady County District Attorney Robert Carney said, Friday night, that questions about ownership of the money would have made for a difficult prosecution of Skoog. “It was muddled to say the least,” he added.

    Sheriff Buffardi sums up “The whole thing is unusual, very unusual,” adding “It was a very difficult case to work. … The funny thing is, nobody’s happy about it.” A couple more points, in passing:

    1. The Gazette article makes no mention of the state or federal Internal Revenue Service.
    2. The Editor of this website lived on said block in the Stockade, near the Mohawk River, for more than a decade, and can attest that (1) parking is terrible, and (2) the basements in the homes on Union Street, many of which are well over 150 years old, are very damp and musty.

    follow-up (Dec. 15, 2009): The Albany Times Union reports today, in an article headlined “Bank fraud counts filed: Owner of appraisal company allegedly had role in mortgage fraud” (Dec. 15, 2009, by Paul Nelson) that:

    The owner of a Capital Region appraisal company facing federal bank fraud charges for his alleged role in a mortgage fraud and property-flipping scheme that authorities say reaped more than $200,000 over a three-year period says the accusations against him are a “mystery.”

    The defendant in that indictment is said to be “Michael Cassadei.”  He certainly seems to be the same person as the Michael Casadei described above.  (For example, when suing the County for return of his money, he spelled his named “Cassadei.”  The AAA Allstate Appraisal firm is listed in an online directory as being  located at 241 Union Street, the site of the Musty Money Caper.  Also, both “Michael F. Casadei” and “Michael F. Cassadei” are listed as being from Schenectady and Saratoga County, and 53 years of age, by the online people-search firm Intellus.)  The U.S. Attorney alleges that “the illegal business dealings lasted from December 1998 to January 2001.  The money stashed in the wall of Casadei’s Stockade house was over $200k and went missing in 2004. (Also see the Schenectady Gazette article “Businessman indicted on fraud charges,” by Kathy Bowen, Dec. 15, 2009.)  For more Cassadei perfidy:  See the 2005 decision of New York’s 3rd Dept. Appellate Division captioned Cassadei v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance (decided August 11, 2005, Dkt. 97628), which we describe in some detail in our post “getting his musty money back.”

    Mortgage Scam Update:  Mr. Cassadei/Casadei was sentenced to 27 months in federal prison on Wednesday, Dec. 29, 2010.  The judge used the sentencing guidelines in place at the time of the crime, not the current, harsher guidelines for white-collar crimes.  Casadei’s lawyer,  Donald Kinsella, argued that he has turned his life around with a home-heating fuel coop that helps people, and should merely get house arrest.  See “Prison in mortgage scam,” Albany Times Union, Dec. 29, 2010).  According to the Schenectady Gazette, on the courthouse steps his ex-girlfriend opined “He has no morals and he has no regrets.” (“Galway man gains fed term for bank scam,” Dec. 30, 2010; subscription required).

    how delightful–
    my damp, sweaty
    travel robe

    looking now
    with greedy eyes
    bare winter trees


    small talk
    in the cellar
    spring rain

    ….. by Kobayashi ISSA, translated by David G. Lanoue

    crow with a mouthful

    Filed under: pre-06-2006 — David Giacalone @ 10:32 am

    on the highwire

    crow with a mouthful

    buzzed by a sparrow

     

     

     








    Christmas eve-
    the row of cut trees
    no one took home

     



    credits: “on the highwire” – “Summerday, Puget Sound,” a haiku sequence

               “Christmas eve” – Modern Haiku XXIX:2 (Summer 1998)


     



    by dagosan:  





    waiting room –

    the masked man

    brings his own magazine


                                
       [Dec. 11, 2004]

     

    one-breath pundit



    Do Lawyers Slow Income Growth?  First we mentioned Prof. Magee’s estimate of lost   plunge graph sm 


    productivity; then RiskProf extrapolated some new numbers; now, Walter Olson points

    to a recent study on lawyers per capita per state, described in an article at Expansion-

    Management.com.   Despite his awesome concession, I’m not sure Walter’s suggestion

    of a better yardstick would work very well, either:


    “Where you have a lot of business centers, generally you will have a lot of

    attorneys, and it doesn’t necessarily mean that they are bad for the economy,”

    said Walter Olson, founder and editor of the Web site, www.overlawyered.com,

    and senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute. Olson said he has a better yardstick.

     

    “If you could measure how many attorneys are out there advertising for injury cases,

    that would be a much better indicator for how high the expected hassle value is of

    doing business in a given state,” he pointed out.

    tiny check This time, we agree with Prof. Bainbridge: “it is grossly unethical for a professor to

    take money to speak on behalf of some interest group without disclosing the conflict of interest

    thereby created. “

     

    tiny check We also agree with the NYT editorial staff:  Harry Reid shouldn’t be suggesting

    Antonin Scalia for Chief Justice, merely because Scalia’s “one smart guy.”

     

    December 10, 2004

    fla. bar sics a giant on the pit bull

    Filed under: pre-06-2006 — David Giacalone @ 4:58 pm

    The Florida Bar must really want to muzzle the 800 pit bull ads that it helped make famous

    in disciplinary proceedings against the firm Pape & Chandler.  FBA has drafted Barry Richard

    — a Florida giant in the field of appellate law — to pursue its crusade against the purportedly

    deceptive and undignified  lawyer advertising.   Richard is a partner at the Tallahassee firm of

    Greenburg Traurig, and is perhaps best known for his nationally televised argument on behalf

    of President Bush before the Florda Supreme Court in the Election 2000 Bush-Gore litigation.  

     

    dog black As we explained more fully here:


    The Honorable Judge William W. Herring presided over the matter as Referee

    and ruled that neither the 1 (800) PITBULL number, nor P&C’s logo (depicting

    the head of a pit bull in a spiked collar) are deceptive or otherwise violative of 

    the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar; furthermore, the State’s lawyer advertising

    rules are unconstitutional restrictions on commercial speech as applied here by

    The Florida Bar.

    We think this case will backfire on the censors at the Florida Bar — we put our money on Pape

    & Chandler and the First Amendment.

     

    update (8 PM): Tim Chinaris of sunEthics has written to remind us that Barry Richard un-

    successfully represented the Florida Bar in the Mason v. Florida Bar (11th Cir. 2002) Attorney

    Steven G. Mason used an ad that stated “AV rated, the Highest Rating [in the] Martindale-

    Hubbell National Legal Directory.”  FBA said the ad violated an ethical rule prohibiting

    “self-laudatory” advertising, and insisted Mason include a disclaimer that Martindale-

    Hubbell does not rate all lawyers and that the ratings are exclusively based upon information

    from confidential sources. (see 1st Amendment Law Center for a good summary of Mason

    After losing at the 11th Circuit, Richard is quoted saying, “I admit that this case was at the

    edge of the envelope.”   This time, the Florida Bar has again gone over the edge.

     










    spring breeze–
    two samurai
    attend the dog


     


    after plastering
    the gate with fleas
    the dog runs off


     

    the dog
    braces himself…
    snowball!

     

     

     ISSA, translated by David G. Lanoue

    having to guess

    Filed under: pre-06-2006 — David Giacalone @ 12:06 pm







    autumn clothesline

    his and her pyjamas

    frozen together

     

    calmly talking divorce

    underfoot the crackle

    of fallen leaves







    dead end sign

     

     

    having to guess

    from the footsteps:

    evening fog

     

     

    George Swede from just one page of


     



    by dagosan:  





    eyelid lightshow —

    he hits the snooze button

    one more time


                                  [Dec. 10, 2004]

     

    one-breath pundit


       Poor Walter Olson, people keep mistaking the Editor of Overlawyered.com
    for a lawyer, and now LegalAffairs has him listed among the candidates in

    its poll to find the Top 20 Legal Thinkers in America.  I’m sure Walter would

    be the first to tell you that not being a lawyer may be one of the best ways

    to be one of “the country’s most influential and important legal thinkers—

    the ones whose ideas are pushing the law forward (or backward, as the case

    may be).”  You have until March 1, 2005 to submit your six choices.    

     

    tiny check  Prof. Bainbridge asked on Wednesday “Has Slate ever responded

    to – or even acknowledged – the devastating criticisms my friend and colleague

    Eugene Volokh routinely directs at their Bushism of the Day column?”  We ask:

    Why should they have to?  Anyone who reads Slate‘s Bushism series knows

    why they do it.  Point-by-point refutation (often overkilling the topic and audience

    to the point of mental numbness) is not going to change even one mind.  It must

    instead make the average reader say “I get it, I get it, I get it already, Eugene!”    

     

    tiny check Which reminds me, nobody at Mirror of Justice has seen fit to respond to the     dead end sign n

     posts here on religious law schools, such as, religious law schools offer no salvation, and

    no one has taken our faith-based law school exam.  


    foer reviews five

    Filed under: pre-06-2006 — David Giacalone @ 11:39 am

    Bert Foer, President of the American Antitrust Institute, makes your holiday gift shopping easier — and

    may improve your understanding of policy issues involving markets, competition, and corporate structure

     — with a holiday book review posted today that covers the following books:




    Foer sets up the review with this introduction:


    “Markets and governments have been with us throughout history, but our notions of how these two

    featured instruments of civilization should interact are constantly changing. Five recent books throw

    light on current thinking about the nature of firms and markets and the appropriate role for government,

    particularly with respect to government’s paradoxical antitrust role as the middle way protector of

    competition, the principal alternative to a heavy-handed regime of economic regulation or its opposite,

    laissez faire capitalism. The microeconomic paradigm known as the Chicago School (or what Joseph

    Stiglitz in the international context calls “the Washington Consensus”) has controlled federal antitrust

    policy since the election of Ronald Reagan. The paradigm is flawed, but its successor has not yet

    congealed.”

     


    at the market
    with all his might
    firefly flits

                    ISSA, translated by D. Lanoue                                                                                                             watch step sign 

    December 9, 2004

    a toast to my wombmate

    Filed under: pre-06-2006 — David Giacalone @ 10:50 am

    Happy Birthday to my brother-twin, Arthur J. Giacalone, who is (yikes) fifty-five years old today.  55 limit 

    Best wishes always to my first friend!   Being a twin does not always mean harmony, but it certainly 

    does mean having a safety net of care and understanding.  As the decades go by, I find myself

    missing my brother’s physical presence more and more — email and phone calls and quick holiday

    visits among throngs of family members aren’t enough.  Arthur lives about 300 miles away. (And, yes,

    dear reader, it is strange watching your twin grow older.  So far, he’s doing it gracefully.)

     








     

     

    twins’ birthday –

    two cakes

    hundreds of miles apart

                                           dagosan

                                                         [12/09/04]

     







     

    fall twilight–

    my brother going out

    long

     

                          Barry George             bocci

                                  from A New Resonance 2    

                                           

     


    rootbound path

    years ago it showed

    how nimble I was

     

                              George Swede

                                from Almost Unseen: Selected Haiku of George Swede 


     

     



    tiny check  Humble and smiling thanks to my Pasadena friend

     George Wallace , who took up my dare on his Dec. 6 birthday

    with a reciprocal birthday double-dactyl of his own, with wishes

    for my twin Arthur, and all the f/k/a alter egos, too:



    To a One-Breath Pundit and Bard of the Bar

    Annually, annually,
    David the Ethical
    (and his twin brother) more
    Elderly grow.


    Haiku sustains him, and
    Weblogging Fools wish him
    Well, with a Hey-nonny,
    Hey-nonny noh!


     

    tiny check  That’s it.  No ethics, law or politics.  Just the important

    stuff today.

    December 8, 2004

    baseball’s antitrust exemption: intestate commerce (stare decisis on steroids?)

    Filed under: pre-06-2006 — David Giacalone @ 6:58 pm

    Federal Club v. National League is the disinherited child of interstate commerce law.  In a decision

    written by Oliver Wendell Holmes, the Supreme Court decided in 1922 that baseball is not commerce

    and the antitrust laws did not apply.  Although interstate commerce doctrine has changed mightily

    since then, and all other sports have been brought under the interstate commerce umbrella, baseball

    still has its antitrust exemption, due to the application of  the principle of stare decisis [“let what is

    decided stand”] in Flood v. Kuhn in 1972.

                                                                                                                                                                                      at bat neg 

     

    The interest in Congress over the use of steriods by baseball players has renewed the issue.  Two days

    ago,   I asked if any one knew the current status of baseball under the Commerce Clause.  Today, Greg

    at Sports Law Blog has strongly reiterated his belief that baseball is interstate commerce, disagreeing with Fed84.  Besides all the factual and doctrinal reasons that support this conclusion, Greg points to one

    sentence in Flood v. Kuhn , the assertion that:

      “Professional baseball is a business and it is engaged in interstate commerce.”

    And, Greg adds: “If it was true in 1972, I have to imagine it is true today.”  I would hope that common

    sense prevails and baseball would be once and for all included within the Commerce Clause (and lose its

    antitrust exemption).  However, I must note that the sentence from Flood is strictly speaking dictum, as the

    issue did not have to be reached by the Court, which upheld the Federal Club antitrust exemption,

    explaining:


    “If there is any inconsistency or illogic in all this, it is an inconsistency and illogic of

    long standing that is to be remedied by the Congress and not by this Court. If we were

    to act otherwise, we would be withdrawing from the conclusion as to congressional intent

    made in Toolson and from the concerns as to retrospectivity therein expressed. Under

    these circumstances, there is merit in consistency even though some might claim that

    beneath that consistency is a layer of inconsistency.”

    at bat  I believe Greg was correct when he said, on December 6, that Congress might use the threat to

    withdraw baseball’s antitrust exemption as leverage to get baseball to fix the steroid problem on its own. 

    [Of course, that would pit the players’ interest in having the antitrust exemption removed with the owners’

    desire to keep the exemption.]

     

    Two parting thoughts: (1) it will be interesting to see how this conservative Supreme Court deals with both

    the Commerce Clause and stare decisis in a number of cases in the next few years; consistency? activism? 

    (2) The Federal Club case indicates that even so venerable a justice as Oliver W. Holmes can come to a conclusion in a Commerce Clause case that seems to be based on personal whim rather than on precedent

    and common sense (see the discussion in Flood, 407 U.S. 258, 271, showing there were precedent by the

    likes of Learned Hand, Justice Harlan, and Holmes himself that pointed to finding baseball to be commerce).  Folks might keep that in mind when predicting the results in the pendng wine shipping and medical marijuana

    cases.

     

    update (Oct. 1, 2005): More on this topic in “exempt this! baseball, antitrust & stare decisis”,

    which discusses Bruce Fein‘s article Baseball’s Privileged Antitrust Exemption(Washington 

    Lawyer, Oct. 2005).  Fein gives the history of the exemption and shows how it has harmed fans in

    the District of Columbia.












     

    high noon

    the boys refill

    their water pistols

     

     





    the foul ball lands

    in an empty seat

    summer’s end

     

                                    


    bases loaded

    a full moon clears

    the right field fence

     

     


    “high noon” –   July Selection, Snapshot Press, 2005 Haiku Calendar                                                  

    “the foul ball lands” – Modern Haiku 35.2 (Summer 2004);  

    “bases loaded” – from the haiku chapbook piano practice       

     

    the lobsters stir

    Filed under: pre-06-2006 — David Giacalone @ 11:48 am




    untended fish stall–

    the lobsters

    stir in their tanks

     

     









    spelling test

    the teacher’s

    squeaky shoes

     

     


    credits: “untended fish stall” – Modern Haiku XXX:3

    “spelling test” – Frogpond XXIII:3

     

    55 limit n  Most days, I think age is mostly a mind thing, but today is my last day in my

    “early 50’s”, and it is hard to ignore some of the bodily signs of aging — especially

    when I realize they will only exacerbate over the next few decades (we live pretty

    long in my family).  Looking back over haiku that I penned this Dec. week last year 

    [scroll to bottom], they seemed to be body-worried, too.  To prove that my mind is

    also going, I haven’t come up yet with a new haiku for today, but here is a fun

    one from last December:


     


    by dagosan:  





    poking a cold nose
    from under warm blankets
    that squirrel and I
                                  [dag, 12/05/03]


    1 PM: Real-life brings inspiration:

     



    frantic shampooing–

    long hot shower

    suddenly cold


                                  [dag, 12/08/04]

     one-breath pundit



    tiny check Best wishes to Mike “the Fedster” Cernovich at Crime & Federalism, who has his

    last law school exam tomorrow (Dec. 9).  Mike hasn’t posted as of  Noon today — I hope that

    means he is studying, rather than preparing an especially long post while procrastinating

    just one more time as a law student.  Were there weblogs 28 years ago, I would have surely

    been in the procrastinatin’ camp.

     

    Even Gomer Nods : This might not measure up to other plagiarism episodes we’ve seen

    this year (see, e.g. here, there, but it is at least a little ironic that the following Notice appeared

    at the foot of the Speaking of Ethics column in this month’s Washington Lawyer:


    From the Editors: We recently discovered that significant portions of a number of

    “Speaking of Ethics” columns should have quoted or otherwise been attributed to

    the opinions of the D.C. Bar’s Legal Ethics Committee. Washington Lawyer apologizes

    to its readers for any confusion this oversight may have caused. The specific columns

    involved are being noted and corrected in the magazine’s online pages at www.dcbar.org.”

     

    tiny check  While Googling the “spelling test” haiku above, I notice an ad selling squeaky shoes

    for babies and had to check it out.  The ad copy includes the statement “Parents love this shoe even

    more than the kids.”  Perhaps Denise at B&B has an opinion on the product.  [I was Googling to make

    sure I hadn’t already used Barry’s haiku on this site.  We Boomers need all the memory aids we can get.]

     

    lawyer cellphone small  Bummer.  I completely missed the radio ads sponsored again this year by the

    NYSBA, in their “Lawyers Trusted Advisors” series.  Prof. Yabut had a lot to say about an earlier version

    of this campaign last April in PR or Parody?.  You can find the text for the 2004 ads here.  I was particularly

    inspired to go hug a lawyer by this one:


    Script 3 – “Rule of Law”:

    Voice 1: To read the headlines, it seems our way of life is open to attack from inside

    and outside forces.
    Voice 2: We live in challenging times.
    Voice 1: Change seems certain.
    Voice 2: But one thing doesn’t change. . . our system of government. . . based not

    on the politics of the moment. . .but on the rule of law.
    Voice 1: The founders of our country made it that way.
    Voice 2: Think about it.
    Voice 1: The law. . .it’s your business. This message brought to you by the 72-thousand

    member New York State Bar Association and the New York State Broadcasters Association.

     

    tiny check  If you care about the future of lawyer advertising, you should check out the proposed ad rules from the Florida Bar’s “Advertising Task Force 2004”, which is seeking comments until Dec. 31. (via SunEthics)

     


    tiny check I hope J. Craig Williams will turn his many talents to this story: “Judge’s role in quarrel queriedboxer smf

    City Court jurist allegedly went toward defendant in heated exchange” (Albany (NY) Times Union, Dec. 8, 2004)

    No one present is talking, and the steno’s transcript abruptly stops.  The article notes: 


    “Sources said the argument between the two became so heated that Carter allegedly threw his robe

    to the ground after he launched from his bench”

    December 7, 2004

    . . . and pseudo-eponymously yours, too

    Filed under: pre-06-2006 — David Giacalone @ 4:55 pm

    To follow up on my morning post about naming weblogs: Being anonymous shouldn’t mean having no personality, and the name of a weblog can help create a consistent identity, while its author remains nameless.  [see Craig and Evan on weblog-building.]
    .

    Although I prefer weblogs with identified proprietors, a good pseudonym seems like the answer for those desiring to remain unknown: As Wikipedia notes
    “The main difference between anonymity and pseudonymity is that while in anonymity the identity is not known, in pseudonymity, there exists a separate persistent “virtual” identity but it cannot be linked to a physical person, persons or organization.”
    ship to label sm

    Adopting a pseudonym — and a pseudo-eponymous name for a weblog — is far more interesting than sticking the word “anonymous” next to some generic role or title. I’m grateful that the anonymous authors of Go Ask Alice, The Way of a Pilgrim, and Story of O, decided not to use the titles “Anonymous Novel,” Anonymous Non-Fiction Book, or “Anonymous Biography.”   They wanted to keep their own identity hidden — not the identity of the publication.

    So, unless you’re trying to corner the service-mark on a term that uses “anonymous”, spend a little time coming up with an interesting and revealing title for your weblog (or, you’ll end up like this weblog, confusing the hell out of people).
    • Of course, if you’re merely trying to get good placement in alphabetical listings, you should use the tried and true ad strategy:  Make it:  “AAAAnonymous Weblogger.”

    • Don’t forget to “Google” your proposed name before launching. 

      update (Dec. 10, 2004): The Common Scold, citing an ABA Journal article on anonymous weblogs by associates,  asks what her readers think about the issue.  Let her know. (via Legal Blog Watch).  As I told da Scold, law students and associates (and all weblogging lawyers) would be better off assuming that they will eventually be identified, and they should therefore write only what they are willing to have attributed to themselves (including saying only things that an identified attorney can say ethically about their clients, partners, etc.). 

       

       

    its name tag blowing
    in the winter rain…
    bag of rice

    mountain temple–
    the little priest’s name
    on his fan

    ISSA, translated by D. Lanoue

     

    one-breath pundit
    tiny check There’s also a big advantage to the legal profession from having weblogs that eschew generic lawyer and judge names and images: they will help remind the world that there is no generic lawyer — we come in many varieties, playing many roles, and with many levels of skill and ethics.
    mouse lawyer horiz Then, maybe lawyers will stop lumping themselves together as victims, as D.C. Bar President John C. Keeney Jr. does in this month’s Washington Lawyer Keeney bewails the attacks in Election 2004 on “trial lawyers” and insists “An attack on lawyers and judges is truly an attack on each of us.”   Sorry, John, no matter where you come down on the issue of tort reform, there is no guilt by association that tars all lawyers and you perpetuate that notion with your whining (such as last month, when you pledged not to laugh at lawyer jokes; prior post).  Even when someone slurs or jokes about “lawyers” in general, a lawyer who has used his or her law degree honorably should feel no insult – there are more than a million of us and only a moron thinks we are all knaves or fools.  Prior related posts:
    update (Dec. 20, 2004): Evan Schaeffer turns his acid pen to the topic of the Stereotypical Lawyer.  Now, if Evan would just stop being defensive about the overall image of lawyers, he’d be even more fun to meet at a party.
    tiny check If you’re feeling underpaid as an attorney, please see MyShingle’s summary of a new NYSBA survey of lawyer income, described here.  The average solo lawyer in Central NY has an income of $50,000.  As I point out in a lengthy comment at Carolyn’s site, this modest income level makes claims rather weak by assigned counsel here (and in Massachusetts) that the real market value for their services is much higher than government fee levels.  Many NY law firms said there are too many lawyers in the State; and 1% said there are too few. 

    tiny check In case you missed it, here’s what Barack Obama said about the Ukraine election: [at the Gridiron Club, Dec. 4, 2004, via Rick Klau]
    “‘Well, President Bush said he wanted to export American-style democracy and, by God, I think it’s working.”

     

     

    nonymously yours

    Filed under: pre-06-2006 — David Giacalone @ 1:46 pm

    Two of the most enjoyable weblogs around are the “famous” Anonymous Lawyer and   thesaurus

    the new Anonymous Law Professor.  What I can’t understand, though, is why such

    creative people can’t use more interesting synonyms for the overused “anonymous.”

    Wouldn’t names like Professor Incognito or the Unsub Lawyer be more fun and helpful? 

    If necessary, try the Merriam-Webster online thesaurus for starters, if you’re contemplating

    starting a weblog with identity undisclosed.




    • Wikipedia’s notes on anonymity are interesting, including: “Disguising one’s identity

      may also be by choice, for legitimate reasons such as privacy and, in some

      occasions, personal safety. Criminals usually prefer to stay anonymous,

      such as when writing a letter with a threat or demand.”


    On the other hand, I wish my friends the At-Least-a-Third bar association would

    stop thumbing through thesauri trying to figure out euphemisms for what they do.

    No matter what the Notable Lawyer Schaeffer might think, “consumer lawyers” was

    not apt, and  Mickey Kaus and Walter Olson are correct: public protection lawyers

    won’t pass the giggle test.  Why not plain-old “plaintiff’s tort lawyers“? 

     





    • Dec. 10: Common Scold, citing an ABA Journal article on anonymous weblogs by associates,

      asks what her readers think about the subject.  Let her know. (via Legal Blog Watch).  As

      I told da Scold, law students and associates (and all weblogging lawyers) would be better

      off assuming that they will eventually be identified, and they should therefore write only

      what they are willing to have attributed to themselves (including saying only things that

      an identified attorney can say ethically about their clients, partners, etc.).




    We’re having an anonymously drizzly December day here in Schenectady, but

    Billie Wilson’s haiku is always nonymous and recognized:








    winter rain–

    the clock chimes three-quarters

    past some dark hour

     

     

    mountain silhouettes
    against a darkening sky
    cabin lights beckon

     

     


    “winter rain” from New Resonance 3: Emerging Voices; South by Southeast 9:3

     

     


    by dagosan:  





    can’t put a name

    to a very pretty face –


    birthday gift

                          [Dec. 7, 2004]  

    « Newer PostsOlder Posts »

    Powered by WordPress