![](\"http:\/\/cyber.law.harvard.edu\/blogs\/static\/dowbrigade\/jedgar2.jpg\")
SAN FRANCISCO, Feb. 25 (AP) – Google Inc.’s concerns that a Bush administration
\n demand to examine millions of its users’ Internet search requests would
\n violate privacy rights are unwarranted, the Justice Department said Friday
\n in a court filing.<\/p>\n
from The Wait a minute! The Bush administration wants (somehow that sounds a The Dowbrigade has long subscribed to the Dodgeball Dogma while But millions of Google Users could easily include YOU or US. They could On the other hand, Does anyone know of a hack or a simple program that PREVENTS Google SAN FRANCISCO, Feb. 25 (AP) – Google Inc.’s concerns that a Bush administration demand to examine millions of its users’ Internet search requests would violate privacy rights are unwarranted, the Justice Department said Friday in a court filing. from The … Continue reading
\n New York Times<\/a><\/p>\n
\n lot scarier than just saying "George Bush wants", which sounds like the
\n setup
\n for
\n a joke) to examine MILLIONS of users’ search results? That’s crazy! <\/em><\/p>\n
\n making his way through life – blend in, don’t attract attention and
\n rely on
\n the law of averages. If the RIAA has sued 5,000 users out of 100 million,
\n and the average defendant was sharing over 500 files, we figure we are
\n pretty safe looking for Christmas carols with Lime Wire. If we read that
\n the IRS audits 2% of the people with one job who take the standard deduction
\n and 5% of the people who itemize, we’ll take the standard, even if it
\n costs us a bit more.<\/em><\/p>\n
\n conceiveably be interested in some of the promising email we seem to
\n be getting these days from certain foreign pharmacies. And what will
\n they make of our fascination with the American Nazi Party? Will they
\n conclude we are a skinhead? With a name like Feldman? <\/em><\/p>\n
\n the Justice Department could easily misconstrue the research we have
\n been
\n doing
\n lately on the
\n bladder capacity of a series of aquatic mammals and marsupials. Or
\n any number of other passing fancies or arcane areas of legitimate research.
\n There are doors that we open in our ceaseless search for knowledge and
\n titillation
\n which we choose to close immediately, and which should remain closed.<\/em><\/p>\n
\n from keeping a record of your searches, or at least the connection between
\n those searches and your IP or actual identity?<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"