![](\"http:\/\/cyber.law.harvard.edu\/blogs\/static\/dowbrigade\/podcast203.jpg\")
The
\n current "Who Do" over the history of podcasting struck us first as comical
\n (as had podcasting itself), then
\n as perplexing, and then back to ridiculous. As we mentioned
\n in another forum, history written by direct participants is not history,
\n it’s propaganda, however sincere and well-intentioned it may be.<\/p>\n
But a news As someone who witnessed a lot of the action and remains Wordsmiths hail podcast success<\/strong><\/p>\n The term ‘podcast’ has been declared Word of the Year by the New The term is defined as "a digital recording of a radio broadcast Good show, all<\/p>\n from the BBC<\/a><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" The current "Who Do" over the history of podcasting struck us first as comical (as had podcasting itself), then as perplexing, and then back to ridiculous. As we mentioned in another forum, history written by direct participants is not history, … Continue reading
\n item<\/a> caught up in our news net underlines
\n a slightly different take on what’s going on here. History IS being
\n made, right under our eager fingertips, and the version that is being
\n laid down now, although not definitive, will forever after be the "source
\n material" for future analysis, interpretation and revisionism.<\/p>\n
\n friends with most of the principals, we couldn’t care less. We have
\n always been more interested in what’s going<\/em> to happen than in
\n what’s over and done with. But check it out:<\/p>\n\n
\n Oxford American Dictionary<\/a>.<\/p>\n
\n or similar program, made available on the internet for downloading to
\n a personal audio player".<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n