{"id":552,"date":"2005-09-28T23:53:45","date_gmt":"2005-09-29T03:53:45","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/dbnews\/2005\/09\/28\/the-gray-lady-strays-into-pay-to-play\/"},"modified":"2005-09-28T23:53:45","modified_gmt":"2005-09-29T03:53:45","slug":"the-gray-lady-strays-into-pay-to-play","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/2005\/09\/28\/the-gray-lady-strays-into-pay-to-play\/","title":{"rendered":"The Gray Lady Strays into Pay to Play"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a name='a7129'><\/a><\/p>\n<table width=\"537\" border=\"0\">\n<tr>\n<td height=\"286\">\n<p align=\"justify\">As all regular on-line readers undoubtedly<br \/>\n        know by now, the gray lady of American journalism, the New York Times,<br \/>\n        as gone to a two-tiered system for their web content &#8211; just the facts,<br \/>\n        m&#8217;am, for free, and the cutting analysis of media stars like Krugman<br \/>\n        and Dowd for paid membership ($50 a year) in the preterit Times Select.<br \/>\n        As was to be expected, this caused an uproar in the media circles in<br \/>\n        general and the blogosphere in particular.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">The best survey of opinion we have seen so far comes<br \/>\n        from Jay Rosen at <a href=\"http:\/\/journalism.nyu.edu\/pubzone\/weblogs\/pressthink\/\">PressThink<\/a>.&nbsp; He<br \/>\n        is, on the whole, skeptical of the strategy, which officials at the Times<br \/>\n        estimate must attract membership in the six figures in order to be considered<br \/>\n        successful.&nbsp; <a href=\"http:\/\/slate.msn.com\/id\/2126102\/&amp;#notready\">Micky<br \/>\n        Krause<\/a>, among others, makes the point that one<br \/>\n        of the main reasons everyone READS Kristoff and Krugman is BECAUSE everybody<br \/>\n        else is reading it, and it&#8217;s what&#8217;s being discussed around metaphorical<br \/>\n        water coolers on desktops around the country. <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">This will no longer be<br \/>\n        the case if they go the &quot;exclusivity&quot; route.&nbsp; With this<br \/>\n        pay to play deal about as many people will shell out to read Maureen<br \/>\n        Dowd as currently pay for T. Boone Pickens investment advice. Of course,<br \/>\n        there are those who will question whether she has or deserves much influence<br \/>\n        now, like Jay Rosen, who says she is bereft of ideas. Be that as it may,<br \/>\n        she knows how to string a phrase together , especially when she gets<br \/>\n        worked up, and she has been known to make me laugh out loud, and that&#8217;s<br \/>\n        about all we can ask of a writer these days, at least of one we can read<br \/>\n        in a newspaper. So we will miss reading her twice a week.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">Or will we? Doesn&#8217;t information <em>want<\/em> to be<br \/>\n        free? Surely there must be an easy way to read the few columnists we<br \/>\n        like and look for without buying the whole paper or becoming an &quot;Elitist&quot;.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">First we tried the University Library where we work.&nbsp; We<br \/>\n        had heard they had a site licence for the New York Times. Turns out<br \/>\n        they did &#8211; but only for the archives. Nothing newer than 2002.&nbsp; However,<br \/>\n        the University also has a site licence for Lexis-Nexis, and through<br \/>\n        their &quot;Universe&quot; portal we had Dowd&#8217;s latest column on the screen in<br \/>\n        minutes.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">It&#8217;s not one of her best.&nbsp; She is, unfortunately,<br \/>\n        capable of abysmal writing as well, and does not always catch fire either<br \/>\n        emotionally or rhetorically. But the important thing was that we could<br \/>\n        read it if we wanted, and decide for ourself.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">A little more digging turned up several web sites dedicated<br \/>\n        to defeating the Times new policy. Turns out that most of the top Times<br \/>\n        columnists are syndicated to some degree, and that many of the publication<br \/>\n        subscribing to the syndication are NOT subscription-only sites themselves,<br \/>\n        and so the columns are available for the clicking. <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">A blogger named Josh Tabin has started a site called<br \/>\n        <a href=\"http:\/\/slate.msn.com\/id\/2126102\/&amp;#notready\">Never Pay Retail,<\/a> on<br \/>\n        which he collects links to the New York Times TS (<em>Times Select<\/em>, or as<br \/>\n        cynics have noted <em>Tough Shit<\/em>) columns available<br \/>\n        for free elsewhere. Those that are not linked to legitimate publications<br \/>\n        sites are labeled &quot;Bootleg available&quot;, which when clicked leads to an<br \/>\n        explanation that while innumerable bloggers have posted illegal bootlegs<br \/>\n        of the columns, he doesn&#8217;t want any problems with the New York Times<br \/>\n        legal team, and so will only suggest that readers try searching by title<br \/>\n        on Technotrati or Google Groups.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">Beneath this notice were numerous comments denouncing<br \/>\n        poor Josh as a pussy and a pansy.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">Hopping over to Technorati, we found the Dowd column in seconds,<br \/>\n        for example reprinted in its entirety on a blog called <a href=\"http:\/\/nastyletterstocrookedpoliticians.blogspot.com\/2005\/09\/september-28-2005-dancing-in-dark-by.html\">Nasty<br \/>\n        Letters to Crooked Politicians<\/a>. So, these forbidden fruits are available,<br \/>\n        albeit at the cost of a few extra clicks of the mouse. Is it worth it?<br \/>\n        Let&#8217;s do the math.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">We probably read a couple of these columns a day, five<br \/>\n        days a week, on average. A couple of times a week we actually buy the<br \/>\n        paper version, or come across one in a coffee shop. Just tonight, we<br \/>\n        picked up an abandoned copy of the front section at a laundromat. But<br \/>\n        say 10 columns a week, 500 a year. at a cost of 5,000 cents, or about<br \/>\n        10 cents an article.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">If it takes us six extra clicks to reach the column<br \/>\n        now, that works out to about a penny and a half per click.&nbsp; How<br \/>\n        much is a click worth? Although this may seem like a metaphysical question,<br \/>\n        it is an important unknown in many equations being solved in corporate<br \/>\n        boardrooms and advertising agencies these days.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">For now, we&#8217;ll keep our dime, and click through to Maureen,<br \/>\n        although if she doesn&#8217;t pick up the slack and start writing some hot<br \/>\n        stuff that makes us laugh, we may drop those six clicks from our daily<br \/>\n        rotation. We only have so much energy.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>As all regular on-line readers undoubtedly know by now, the gray lady of American journalism, the New York Times, as gone to a two-tiered system for their web content &#8211; just the facts, m&#8217;am, for free, and the cutting analysis &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/2005\/09\/28\/the-gray-lady-strays-into-pay-to-play\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":299,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[32],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-552","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-blogging"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/552","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/299"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=552"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/552\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=552"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=552"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=552"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}