{"id":53,"date":"2005-02-05T11:27:55","date_gmt":"2005-02-05T15:27:55","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/dbnews\/2005\/02\/05\/state-of-the-union\/"},"modified":"2005-02-05T11:27:55","modified_gmt":"2005-02-05T15:27:55","slug":"state-of-the-union","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/2005\/02\/05\/state-of-the-union\/","title":{"rendered":"State of the Union"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a name='a4560'><\/a><\/p>\n<table width=\"537\" border=\"0\">\n<tr>\n<td>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/cyber.law.harvard.edu\/blogs\/static\/dowbrigade\/statoon.jpg\" width=\"537\" height=\"999\"><br \/>\n      Catching up on odds and ends from the past week, we came across the<br \/>\n        notes we took during the President&#8217;s State of the Union speech on Tuesday<br \/>\n        night. We must say, we we quite impressed with his performance, from<br \/>\n        a purely oratorical and dramatic point of view. The man has clearly been<br \/>\n        woodshedding his pitch, we are sure with a host of major league pitching<br \/>\n        coaches and Phded advisors, and the results were impressive.&nbsp; He has almost<br \/>\n        entirely eliminated the infuriating smirks (they did slip out two or three<br \/>\n        times, like a naughty toddler sent upstairs to bed who sneaks halfway<br \/>\n        down the stairs to eavesdrop on the grownups), and replaced it with a<br \/>\n        warm and sincere-seeming slightly wistful smile, which he flashed with<br \/>\n        great effect at various members of the crowd as he mentioned them. These<br \/>\n        artful glances, combined with perfectly timed cutaways to the recipients,<br \/>\n        created the impression of a caring, engaged leader, and combined with<br \/>\n        much improved pronunciation and pacing put this speech head and shoulders<br \/>\n        above the embarrassingly amateurish performances during the Bush-Gore<br \/>\n        campaign<br \/>\n        and the early years of his first term.<\/p>\n<p>As to the content, well, given the willful suspension of disbelief that<br \/>\n        is the hallmark of modern American culture, we were tremendously reassured<br \/>\n        by the message of our maximum leader. The Neo-Con land of make-believe in which we live is a brave new world of enlightened political liberation theology.        <\/p>\n<p>Rejoice! We can save Social Security and the flagging stock market at<br \/>\n          the same time! We are winning the war on terrorism, and will hunt down and eliminate<br \/>\n          those opposed to our way of life like rabid dogs. We can create a culture<br \/>\n        of life!<\/p>\n<p>The beneficent government is protecting African Americans from AIDS!<br \/>\n        Who knew? We are going to end tyranny in our times. We have no desire<br \/>\n        or intention to impose our form of government on any other country. Nevertheless,<br \/>\n        we are going to forcefully promote Democracy around the world.<\/p>\n<p>We are going to achieve peace in the Middle East, finally, by respecting<br \/>\n        the right to sovereignty and self-determination of all peoples, which may involve regime<br \/>\n        change in Iran and Syria.<\/p>\n<p>The President painted a masterful picture, picking and choosing from<br \/>\n        a palate of liberty, freedom, democracy and the other core American values.<br \/>\n        But as the speech wound up, we couldn&#8217;t help but notice a few key omissions.<br \/>\n        For example, there was not a single mention of one key American value,<br \/>\n        that three-letter linchpin of our economy and geopolitical policy these<br \/>\n        past hundred years, and for the foreseeable future &#8211; O-I-L.<\/p>\n<p>The reality of what the American political system has morphed into is<br \/>\n        a new kind of representative democracy, which represents basically<br \/>\n        the oil and defense industries. This is in accord with the most basic<br \/>\n        principles of modern statehood, mirrored in various permutations across<br \/>\n        the board of political systems around the world.<\/p>\n<p>The business of the modern state is to build things and to blow things up.&nbsp; Given<br \/>\n        ultimate control of the highest level of generation and utilization of<br \/>\n        capital, national governments are the biggest players in the first truly<br \/>\n       worldwide integration of the productive capacity of the entire planet, which<br \/>\n        we call the global economy. <\/p>\n<p>Although in theory not profit-making enterprises themselves, national<br \/>\n        governments nevertheless control the collection and spending of the majority<br \/>\n        of capital expenditures around the world, and the companies that they<br \/>\n        favor with their contracts and support are the richest and most powerful<br \/>\n        on the planet. The owners of the biggest companies involved in building<br \/>\n        (Haliburton), operating (the oil and energy industry) and defending what<br \/>\n        we have built while blowing up what our enemies build (the defense<br \/>\n        industries) have such a vested interest in the budgetary decisions of<br \/>\n        the national governments that it is little wonder that they have, since<br \/>\n        their inception, dedicated significant resources to influencing and if<br \/>\n        possible controlling the politicians who make the spending decisions.<\/p>\n<p>It is not only in the US and like minded capitalistic democracies where<br \/>\n        the economic power centers tend to dominate the political policy-makers.&nbsp; In<br \/>\n        our erstwhile ally Saudi Arabia, for example, in an eerie mirror of our own petrolocracy,<br \/>\n        the powers behind the throne are the self-same oil industry and the in-house<br \/>\n        construction empire of the Bin Laden family. Build &#8217;em and blow &#8217;em up, and keep it in the family. Go figure.<\/p>\n<p>Is it too much of a leap to conclude that the energy industry, near the<br \/>\n        apex of its historical cycle of oil dependency and economic primacy,<br \/>\n        would seek to move beyond influencing the politicians who arrive at<br \/>\n        the top and actually groom and put into place their own wholly-owned<br \/>\n        subsidiary in the form of an unabashedly oil-drenched and aggressively<br \/>\n        expansionist administration?<\/p>\n<p>They are at the top of the heap now, legitimately ensconced in power<br \/>\n        and feeling their oats after their successful imposition of an apocalyptic<br \/>\n        vision of an America under siege, but also under courageous leadership<br \/>\n        determined to carry high the torch of liberty and justice for all. After<br \/>\n        listening to President Bush Tuesday night, part of us actually wished<br \/>\n        that his polished but hollow words rang true. What a wonderful world<br \/>\n        it would be.<\/p>\n<p>cartoon from <a href=\"http:\/\/www.felbers.net\/cartoons\/statetoon.jpg\">Felbers.net<\/a><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Catching up on odds and ends from the past week, we came across the notes we took during the President&#8217;s State of the Union speech on Tuesday night. We must say, we we quite impressed with his performance, from a &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/2005\/02\/05\/state-of-the-union\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":299,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[96],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-53","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politics"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/53","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/299"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=53"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/53\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=53"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=53"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=53"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}