{"id":372,"date":"2005-07-13T21:25:53","date_gmt":"2005-07-14T01:25:53","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/dbnews\/2005\/07\/13\/trick-or-treat-pot-pops-popped\/"},"modified":"2005-07-13T21:25:53","modified_gmt":"2005-07-14T01:25:53","slug":"trick-or-treat-pot-pops-popped","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/2005\/07\/13\/trick-or-treat-pot-pops-popped\/","title":{"rendered":"Trick or Treat &#8211; Pot Pops Popped"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a name='a5586'><\/a><\/p>\n<table width=\"537\" border=\"0\">\n<tr>\n<td height=\"353\">\n<p align=\"justify\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/cyber.law.harvard.edu\/blogs\/static\/dowbrigade\/potpop.jpg\" width=\"142\" height=\"128\" align=\"left\">NEW YORK (Reuters) &#8211; Connecticut Tuesday joined a<br \/>\n        growing effort to weed out marijuana-flavored candy from store shelves<br \/>\n        when its attorney general said he would sponsor a statewide ban on &quot;Pot<br \/>\n        Suckers&quot; lollipops.<\/p>\n<p>      Five other states have either banned or are considering a ban on the candy,<br \/>\n      causing New Jersey distributor ICUP to suspend further sales of the green<br \/>\n      candy as of June 28.<\/p>\n<p>      Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal said the candy was being<br \/>\n      sold in novelty stores in large malls throughout the state, marketed with<br \/>\n      slogans such as &quot;Every lick is like taking a hit.&quot;<\/p>\n<p>      The candy, which is flavored with hemp essential oil, does not contain<br \/>\n      THC, the hallucinogenic compound in marijuana, but Blumenthal called it &quot;a<br \/>\n      gateway product&quot; that &quot;glamorizes drugs for children.&quot;The<br \/>\n      candy has been banned by the Chicago City Council and in Suffolk County,<br \/>\n      New York. The New York City Council and the states of Michigan, New Jersey<br \/>\n      and Georgia are considering legislation to ban them.<\/p>\n<p>      ICUP president Steve Trachtenberg  said that in addition to suspending<br \/>\n      distribution of Pot Suckers because of the backlash, his company has put<br \/>\n      on hold plans for related<br \/>\n      items, including a hemp-flavored chocolate candy Buzz Bar.<\/p>\n<p>      Other marijuana-flavored candy products have found their way to the market<br \/>\n      place in recent months including &quot;Kronic Kandy,&quot; made in the<br \/>\n      Netherlands and sold in the Atlanta area, and items from the Mary Jane<br \/>\n      Candy Company including &quot;Ganja Pops&quot; and &quot;Icky Sticky Nuggets.&quot;<\/p>\n<p><i>The last thing a reeferhead wants after a fattie is a lollypop that tastes like a weed&#8230;..<\/i><\/p>\n<p align=\"left\">from <a href=\"http:\/\/reuters.excite.com\/\/article\/20050713\/2005-07-13T122101Z_01_N12595427_RTRIDST_0_ODD-LIFE-CANDYDOPE-DC.html\">Reuters<\/a><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>NEW YORK (Reuters) &#8211; Connecticut Tuesday joined a growing effort to weed out marijuana-flavored candy from store shelves when its attorney general said he would sponsor a statewide ban on &quot;Pot Suckers&quot; lollipops. Five other states have either banned or &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/2005\/07\/13\/trick-or-treat-pot-pops-popped\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":299,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[576],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-372","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-wacky-news"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/372","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/299"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=372"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/372\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=372"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=372"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=372"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}