{"id":3304,"date":"2009-06-10T21:38:00","date_gmt":"2009-06-11T01:38:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/2009\/06\/10\/a-pitchers-worth-a-million-words\/"},"modified":"2009-06-10T21:41:38","modified_gmt":"2009-06-11T01:41:38","slug":"a-pitchers-worth-a-million-words","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/2009\/06\/10\/a-pitchers-worth-a-million-words\/","title":{"rendered":"A Pitcher&#8217;s Worth a Million Words"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/www.popfi.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/shakespeare-seriously-noob.jpg\" alt=\"shakespeare-seriously-noob.jpg\" width=\"455\" height=\"318\" align=\"left\" \/>Austin, Texas June 10, 2009 \u2013 The Global Language Monitor today announced that <em>Web<\/em> <em>2.0<\/em> has bested <em>Jai Ho<\/em>, <em>N00b<\/em> and <em>Slumdog<\/em> as the 1,000,000<sup>th<\/sup> English word or phrase. added to the codex of fourteen hundred-year-old language.<span> <\/span><em>Web 2.0<\/em> is a technical term meaning the next generation of World Wide Web products and services.<span> <\/span>It has crossed from technical jargon into far wider circulation in the last six months<\/p>\n<p>from <a href=\"http:\/\/awesome.goodmagazine.com\/transparency\/web\/0906\/trans0609largestbankruptcies.html\">The Language Monitor<\/a><\/p>\n<p><em>Technically, is &#8220;Web 2.0&#8221; a word? Isn&#8217;t it a phrase or a version? The reason that English has more words than any other language (at least according to English-speaking linguists), is that a) it historically and compulsively steals the best words from all of the other languages it comes into contact with, like schadenfreude and tutti frutti, and b) because it makes it so gosh darned easy to make up new words out of thin air! The English, pedantic though they may be, and unlike the French and Spanish, have no Royal Academy of English to decree what is or is not an &#8220;official&#8221; word. It is a Darwinian jungle of a language, where words subject themselves to a merciless usage-based survival of the fittest. But in the final analysis, any fool can invent a new English word.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>The Dowbrigade attempted to fill a void in Shakespeare&#8217;s voluminous lexicon when, at the tender age of 16, he coined the term &#8220;spastik&#8221; \/spaz-t\u00c9Ek\/, to describe the desire to get high, reasoning analagously that if you want drink you are thirsty, if you want food you are hungry, but if you want to get high, you are spastik.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>It is uncertain if the term spastik ever reached beyond our little gang of juvenile delinquents in Upstate New York. We think we may have heard it in a rap song back in the 80&#8217;s, and once in a smokey reggae bar in Cambridgeport, but it was never clear enough to be sure. Perhaps The Global Language Monitor will never feature it on their web site, but it certainly seems more wordly than &#8220;Web 2.0&#8221;.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Austin, Texas June 10, 2009 \u2013 The Global Language Monitor today announced that Web 2.0 has bested Jai Ho, N00b and Slumdog as the 1,000,000th English word or phrase. added to the codex of fourteen hundred-year-old language. Web 2.0 is &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/2009\/06\/10\/a-pitchers-worth-a-million-words\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1118,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[588,1675,576],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3304","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-humor","category-language","category-wacky-news"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3304","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1118"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3304"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3304\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3306,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3304\/revisions\/3306"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3304"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3304"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3304"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}