{"id":2691,"date":"2004-11-03T19:42:34","date_gmt":"2004-11-03T23:42:34","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/dbnews\/2004\/11\/03\/bush-unbridled\/"},"modified":"2004-11-03T19:42:34","modified_gmt":"2004-11-03T23:42:34","slug":"bush-unbridled","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/2004\/11\/03\/bush-unbridled\/","title":{"rendered":"Bush Unbridled"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a name='a4094'><\/a><\/p>\n<table width=\"537\" border=\"0\">\n<tr>\n<td width=\"550\">\n<p align=\"left\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/cyber.law.harvard.edu\/blogs\/static\/dowbrigade\/bushborg.jpg\" width=\"242\" height=\"240\" align=\"left\">Okay, we take full responsibility for Kerry&#8217;s<br \/>\n        defeat. Turns out these Karmic calculations are more complicated than<br \/>\n        they appear at first glance. John Kerry gave it a good run, looked less<br \/>\n        like an overmatched non-starter than poor Al Gore, but in the end lacked<br \/>\n        the kind of vicious political blood lust that Karl Rove and the rest<br \/>\n        of the Bush Posse have raised to a fine art.<\/p>\n<p>        Despite the stealth edge, the cell-phoned first time voters, the record-setting<br \/>\n      turnout and the exasperating series of gaffes on the part of the incumbent,<br \/>\n      the smart money was on the President all along, and never wavered. Smart<br \/>\n      bettors always play the odds, unless of course they have inside information,<br \/>\n      in which case all bets are off, except theirs. The odds were on the King,<br \/>\n      as they usually are, until and unless the challenger proves to be more<br \/>\n      than a fluke.<\/p>\n<p>      Oh, sure, once in a while they let a long shot win, and a few lucky fools<br \/>\n      made small fortunes betting the Red Sox when they were down 0-3 to the<br \/>\n      Yankees. But these were just the high profile, fantasyland payoffs that<br \/>\n      keep the cookie jar money flowing in and funding professional gambling<br \/>\n      in the United States. Great marketing for the sucker bets, nothing more.<\/p>\n<p>      The smart money was with the Yankees, and will be again next year and every<br \/>\n      year until the Red Sox establish a consistent record of success to counterbalance<br \/>\n      that of the Evil Empire. Same goes for the poor Democrats.<\/p>\n<p>      Unfortunately for Kerry, not only the smart money was riding on Bush, but<br \/>\n      a lot of the dumb money as well. The sheer weight and power of the economic<br \/>\n      interests backing Bush proved impossible for the Democrats to overcome.<br \/>\n      One of the lessons of this election is that the Old Economy power centers<br \/>\n      &#8211; the Oil Industry, Pharmaceutical Industry and Insurance Industry (to<br \/>\n      mention only three prime examples) are still inherently more powerful and<br \/>\n      entrenched<br \/>\n      than the New Money of the Media Conglomerates, the Technology Industry<br \/>\n      and the Entertainment Industry.<\/p>\n<p>      The Republicans used all of that money and power to create a completely<br \/>\n      new and better America. Unfortunately for us, it exists only in their imaginations,<br \/>\n      and for the purpose of enticing easily amused and impressionable Americans<br \/>\n      into their camp.<\/p>\n<p>      It all seemed transparently fanciful and hypocritically unbelievable to<br \/>\n      us, ensconced in our own effete Eastern Academic fantasyland, but millions<br \/>\n      of just plain folks out in the heartland bought into it hook, line and<br \/>\n      stinker.<\/p>\n<p>      So not all of us are mourning this New Morning in America. There are plenty<br \/>\n      of people and groups of people who are happy as clams, and planning for<br \/>\n      a bright new future this morning. Among them are:<\/p>\n<p>      Hillary Clinton is the most obvious and immediate beneficiary. Had Kerry<br \/>\n      won, she would have been sitting in her hands on the sidelines until at<br \/>\n      least 2012, by which point she will have gotten rid of Bill one way or<br \/>\n      the other, and will probably look more like Ruth Bader Ginsburg than Martha<br \/>\n      Stewart. Hillary figures that by &#8217;08 this country is going to be so sick<br \/>\n      of the Bush family and Republican wars that they would vote for Triumph<br \/>\n      the Insult Joke Dog if he were nominated by the convention.<\/p>\n<p>      However, as one of my colleagues pointed out, the first female President<br \/>\n      of the United States is much more likely to be a Republican than a Democrat.<br \/>\n      No Republican is going to vote for a candidate who is a Woman and a Democrat,<br \/>\n      too. On the other hand, a good female Republican candidate would get most<br \/>\n      of the Republicans for her political affiliation, and millions of Democratic<br \/>\n      votes on general principle. Condolezza Rice?<\/p>\n<p>      Another winner in this election is John McCain. Rarely have we seen such<br \/>\n      a deft campaign of electoral fence-sitting as McCain has put on over the<br \/>\n      past year, ingratiating himself to both parties and candidates in such<br \/>\n      a brilliant way that he seemed destined for a cabinet position whoever<br \/>\n      won. Would Kerry have won if McCain had agreed to be his VP? The thinking<br \/>\n      here is that an immeasurably ambitious man like John McCain would not have<br \/>\n      turned Kerry down unless he felt he had a much better chance of ascending<br \/>\n      to the top job down the road. Is he underestimating the potential for underhanded<br \/>\n      betrayal by the Bush Brothers? Only time will tell.<\/p>\n<p>      Many people who have worked and dreamed of authentic change to the Democratic<br \/>\n      System in this county will be pleased, once the dust settles and they get<br \/>\n      over the debacle wrought by a deeply flawed candidate and a misdirected<br \/>\n      campaign organization. After all, how much real deep-seated change can<br \/>\n      be had from swapping one millionaire Alpha Male Yalie for another? Maybe<br \/>\n      electing Kerry would have been like putting a band aid on a malignant tumor<br \/>\n      &#8211; it may cover it up for a little while, but the only real effect is delaying<br \/>\n      any effective treatment of the problem. As mentioned above, after four<br \/>\n      more years of this the population will be ready for some serious change,<br \/>\n      it they survive.<\/p>\n<p>      You should also rejoice today if you own an oil company, or work for an<br \/>\n      oil company, or have stock in an oil company. This election served as a<br \/>\n      referendum on one of the biggest economic redistribution plans in the history<br \/>\n      of the country. With energy prices at record highs, and the administration<br \/>\n      and its lackeys trying to prepare us for three dollar a gallon gas by repeating<br \/>\n      that &quot;Europeans have been paying these prices for years&quot; and &quot;As<br \/>\n      a percentage of income we were paying more in the 70&#8217;s&quot;, money is flowing up the econimic food chain as fast as the greedy bastards can bank it.<\/p>\n<p>      The truth is that the tripling of energy costs (was it just 5 years ago<br \/>\n      that gas was floating around 89 CENTS a gallon) is a de facto blanket tax<br \/>\n      on every individual and business in the country and is siphoning HUNDREDS<br \/>\n      OF BILLIONS OF DOLLARS out of OUR pockets and directly into the bank accounts of Middle Eastern<br \/>\n      sheiks and multi-national oil companies, which are busily banking record profits. It&#8217;s<br \/>\n      good work if you can get it, and will go down in the economics history<br \/>\n      books as one of the slickest scams every successfully run on a supposedly &quot;free&quot; people.<\/p>\n<p>      The War Bloggers are sure to be happy this morning. Bush&#8217;s reelections<br \/>\n      insures a continual chain of wars over the next four years, or more, and<br \/>\n      a muscular reassertion of American willpower and military might guaranteed<br \/>\n      to make us unpopular and unwelcome in every benighted and neglected corner<br \/>\n      of the planet.<\/p>\n<p>      Because don&#8217;t even think that George has learned his lesson, and is going<br \/>\n      to extricate us eventually from his morass in Iraq. He has bigger and better<br \/>\n      things in mind. He&#8217;s like a kid who has gotten away with some old sleazy<br \/>\n      trick, and is dying to try it again, only bigger. There is no telling what<br \/>\n      he is capable of now, crazed with success and no longer burdened by the need to seek reelection. He<br \/>\n      won&#8217;t rest until he makes the world safe for his friends in the Energy,<br \/>\n      Drug and Insurance industries, even if he has to work Saturdays.<\/p>\n<p>      Now that the election is safely in the bag, they can let Chief Justice<br \/>\n      Renquist down off of that terrible Zombie Juice that has been keeping him<br \/>\n      upright in his chair, and let him go gently into that night. With any luck,<br \/>\n      Bush will have three or four vacancies to fill, ensuring us a legacy of<br \/>\n      Compassionate Fascism lasting long into the 21st century.<\/p>\n<p>      So suck it up, boys and girls, there&#8217;s no crying in Politics &#8211; just ask<br \/>\n      Ed Muskie. Whining won&#8217;t get you very far either.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Okay, we take full responsibility for Kerry&#8217;s defeat. Turns out these Karmic calculations are more complicated than they appear at first glance. John Kerry gave it a good run, looked less like an overmatched non-starter than poor Al Gore, but &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/2004\/11\/03\/bush-unbridled\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":299,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[32],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2691","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-blogging"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2691","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/299"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2691"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2691\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2691"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2691"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2691"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}