{"id":261,"date":"2005-05-13T13:00:22","date_gmt":"2005-05-13T17:00:22","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/dbnews\/2005\/05\/13\/unholy-alliance\/"},"modified":"2005-05-13T13:00:22","modified_gmt":"2005-05-13T17:00:22","slug":"unholy-alliance","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/2005\/05\/13\/unholy-alliance\/","title":{"rendered":"Unholy Alliance"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a name='a5084'><\/a><\/p>\n<table width=\"537\" border=\"0\">\n<tr>\n<td>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/cyber.law.harvard.edu\/blogs\/static\/dowbrigade\/hillnewt.jpg\" width=\"325\" height=\"216\" align=\"left\">In the<br \/>\n        ebb and flow of American politics, or of any truly free political system,<br \/>\n        organized groups of shared-interest activists, known as political parties,<br \/>\n        are born and die, as do their leaders.<\/p>\n<p>Since before the Civil War, the Democrats and Republicans have alternated<br \/>\n        in power as they became more institutionalized, more entrenched in the<br \/>\n        halls of power, and fostered political families on each side of the aisle<br \/>\n        bred to power and privilege. We sometimes forget that there is nothing<br \/>\n        in the Constitution mandating<br \/>\n        these<br \/>\n        two parties,<br \/>\n        or even the primacy of TWO parties, or even any parties at all.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p> Let us also not forget that the currently dominant parties WERE once<br \/>\n        part of the same party. Andrew Jackson, a Democratic-Republican from<br \/>\n        Tennessee, was elected president in 1828. His party had great support<br \/>\n        in the South and West.&nbsp; And who can forget successful American parties<br \/>\n        like the Whigs, Federalists, Know-Nothings (our personal favorite) and<br \/>\n        Bull Moose parties?<\/p>\n<p>At least since before the last election, several deep political thinkers,<br \/>\n        prominent among them <a href=\"http:\/\/www.tompaine.com\/articles\/20050425\/a_lean_and_centrist_look.php\">Joe<br \/>\n        Trippi<\/a>, have been predicting the demise of one<br \/>\n        of the political dinosaurs who have dominated the American political<br \/>\n        landscape for the past 150 years. Given the current ascendancy and dominance<br \/>\n        of the Grand Old Party at all levels, it seems obvious which<br \/>\n        of our present parties is headed to the dust heap of history.<\/p>\n<p>The Dowbrigade is among those who feel that 2008 will be the swan song<br \/>\n        of the Democratic Party as a viable counterbalance to the triumphant<br \/>\n        Republicans. As to who will replace the Dems, we have our theory about<br \/>\n        that as well. Only one organization could realistically challenge the<br \/>\n        primacy of the Republicans &#8211; the Republicans themselves.<\/p>\n<p>Since late last year we have  seen the 2008 election shaping up<br \/>\n        as follows: The Bush junta, aka the Evangelical Republicans, will nominate<br \/>\n        Jeb Bush, with Condi Rice as VP.&nbsp; Attractive ticket. Sure to lure<br \/>\n        in at least a smattering of women and blacks, just on general principal,<br \/>\n        like Clarence Thomas.<\/p>\n<p>The Democrats, we thought, were going with Hillary and some Southern<br \/>\n        pretty boy or macho he-man, and hope for the best.&nbsp; We saw this<br \/>\n        as the kiss of death for the Democrats. We predicted that in a<br \/>\n        hotly contested three way race, she comes in third.<\/p>\n<p>Why do we say a three way race? Because we see the real threat to the<br \/>\n        ruling junta as coming from within its own party.&nbsp; There are still<br \/>\n        plenty of old-school Republicans who still believe in evolution.&nbsp; In<br \/>\n        fact, there are millions of honest Americans who voted for George Bush<br \/>\n        and<br \/>\n        who are starting to have some serious doubts about the conduct of the<br \/>\n        wars, both the military operations overseas and the cultural war here<br \/>\n        in the homeland.<\/p>\n<p>They would be ripe for a rational Republican alternative, like, say,<br \/>\n        Colin Powell and John McCain.&nbsp; How&#8217;s that for a ticket? They might<br \/>\n        actually win.&nbsp; They could call themselves the Real Republicans,<br \/>\n        or the New Republicans, or the Rational Republicans, and they would defect<br \/>\n        from the Administration with a sizable piece of the party organization,<br \/>\n        fundraisers, career wonks and droids, and rank and file grassroots organizers.<\/p>\n<p>This is key, as we are convinced that the realities of the modern American<br \/>\n        form of democracy make it extremely difficult if not impossible for a<br \/>\n        band-new, startup political party to seriously compete at any but the<br \/>\n        most local level (all politics may be local, but economies of scale come<br \/>\n        into play at state or national levels).&nbsp; See, for example, the Constitution<br \/>\n        Party, the America First Party, the Reform Party, the Green Party or<br \/>\n        our own party, before we became a Republican, the Natural Law Party.<\/p>\n<p>So<br \/>\n        it is much more likely&nbsp; that we see a realignment based on a<br \/>\n        schism within one of the massive existing parties, and with its surfeit<br \/>\n        of power and internal contradictions, the Dowbrigade nominates the Republicans.&nbsp;Stranger<br \/>\n        things have happened.<\/p>\n<p>For example, see the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2005\/05\/13\/nyregion\/13hillary.html?ex=1273636800&amp;en=5720b07c5c3c5083&amp;ei=5088&amp;partner=rssnyt&amp;emc=rss\">following<br \/>\n          story<\/a> from the front page of today&#8217;s<br \/>\n          <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/\">New York Times<\/a>, about an unholy alliance taking form in Washington between<br \/>\n        Hillary Clinton and Newt Gingritch.<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>Mr. Gingrich, the former House speaker, has been working alongside the<br \/>\n          former first lady on a number of issues, and even appeared with her at<br \/>\n          a press conference on Wednesday to promote &#8211; of all things &#8211; health-care<br \/>\n          legislation.<\/p>\n<p>          But more puzzling than that, Mr. Gingrich has been talking up Mrs.<br \/>\n          Clinton&#8217;s presidential prospects in 2008, to the chagrin of conservative<br \/>\n          loyalists<br \/>\n          who once regarded him as a heroic figure. Last month, he even suggested<br \/>\n          she might capture the presidency, saying &quot;any Republican who thinks<br \/>\n          she&#8217;s going to be easy to beat has a total amnesia about the history<br \/>\n        of the Clintons.&quot;<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>What is this coy eyelash fluttering? Does Newt know that he is now as<br \/>\n        welcome in Republican circles as David Duke? Is Hillary trying to capture<br \/>\n        some of that Old Republican Magic by reaching out to Newt? Could a<br \/>\n        potential alliance between these uber-opportunists somehow pull Hillary<br \/>\n        out of third place in the three-way contest we outlined above?&nbsp; <\/p>\n<p>We somehow doubt it, but it would sure make things interesting in what<br \/>\n        is already shaping up to be the most entertaining election at least since<br \/>\n        the guy<br \/>\n        with the<br \/>\n        ears. At the very least, combined with Bill&#8217;s heartwarming adoption by Poppy Bush (making Bill and George into some sort of twisted <i>quasi-brothers<\/i>&#125;, this fraternization is returning both parties to their roots and true nature &#8211; the Democrat-Republicans of Andrew Jackson.<\/p>\n<p> In politics, as in most of life. it&#8217;s all in the timing. When will<br \/>\n        the<br \/>\n        &quot;moderate&quot;<br \/>\n        Republicans<br \/>\n        make their break from the Evangelicals? They will probably wait for the<br \/>\n        Bushites to invade another country or overstep themselves domestically<br \/>\n        before acting.&nbsp; They can always manufacture a crisis and get Cheney<br \/>\n        and Ashcroft to freak out and declare martial law, or outlaw hip-hop<br \/>\n        music, or arrest Howard Stern and shoot down his satellite, or something<br \/>\n        equally over-the-top.<\/p>\n<p>So get a good seat, folks, the show is about to begin.<\/p>\n<p>article from <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2005\/05\/13\/nyregion\/13hillary.html?ex=1273636800&amp;en=5720b07c5c3c5083&amp;ei=5088&amp;partner=rssnyt&amp;emc=rss\">the New York Times<\/a><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In the ebb and flow of American politics, or of any truly free political system, organized groups of shared-interest activists, known as political parties, are born and die, as do their leaders. Since before the Civil War, the Democrats and &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/2005\/05\/13\/unholy-alliance\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":299,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[96],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-261","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politics"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/261","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/299"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=261"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/261\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=261"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=261"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=261"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}