{"id":2577,"date":"2004-09-15T15:51:48","date_gmt":"2004-09-15T19:51:48","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/dbnews\/2004\/09\/15\/smoking-is-bad-reading-is-good\/"},"modified":"2004-09-15T15:51:48","modified_gmt":"2004-09-15T19:51:48","slug":"smoking-is-bad-reading-is-good","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/2004\/09\/15\/smoking-is-bad-reading-is-good\/","title":{"rendered":"Smoking Is Bad, Reading Is Good"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a name='a3827'><\/a><\/p>\n<table width=\"537\" border=\"0\">\n<tr>\n<td>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/cyber.law.harvard.edu\/blogs\/static\/dowbrigade\/\nreeding.gif\" width=\"220\" height=\"218\" align=\"left\">We were<br \/>\n        watching an insipid situation comedy the other day while correcting essays,<br \/>\n        and we saw an actress in a &quot;typical American family&quot; yawn and say to<br \/>\n        her daughter, &quot;I&#8217;m bored, lets go to the movies.&quot; <\/p>\n<p>We couldn&#8217;t remember the last time that situation had come up in the<br \/>\n        Dowbrigade household. But what struck us was that despite the fact that<br \/>\n        people in the situation comedies were always doing <em>something<\/em>,<br \/>\n        eating or talking or playing games or choosing clothes or moving in or<br \/>\n        out, they were never, ever, reading.<\/p>\n<p>Was this, we wondered, because the TV industry still feels itself locked<br \/>\n        in a struggle-to-the-death with the written word for the eyeballs of<br \/>\n        America? How else to explain the almost complete absence of one of life&#8217;s<br \/>\n        most elemental activities.<\/p>\n<p>In the Dowbrigade&#8217;s world, everybody reads. We carry reading material<br \/>\n        with us wherever we roam, ready to cop a quick chapter, or article, or<br \/>\n        essay between periods, or on the train, or waiting in line at the post<br \/>\n        office. On the Boston subway, everybody is reading, usually a novel,<br \/>\n        and a quick ride on the Red Line serves as a quick read on what&#8217;s being<br \/>\n        read on campus.<\/p>\n<p>Is the rest of America really as lexaphobic as TV-land would have us<br \/>\n        believe? According to a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nea.gov\/news\/news04\/ReadingAtRisk.html\">recent<br \/>\n        study by the National Endowment for the Arts<\/a>, 47% of American adults still read literature (novels, short stories,<br \/>\n        plays) and fully 57% read books of any kind. Not exactly numbers to be<br \/>\n        crowing about, but enough that they ought to be represented in the public<br \/>\n        figures and role models we see everyday on TV.<\/p>\n<p>We have also been following the rash of recent articles on <em>product<br \/>\n          placement <\/em>an increasingly popular form of marketing that isn&#8217;t<br \/>\n          quite advertising, like the Coca-Cola cups casually strewn around the<br \/>\n          on-set table in front of the judges in&nbsp; American Idol, or<br \/>\n          Donald Trump knocking on the doors of the Mattel Corp.&nbsp; Come to<br \/>\n          think of it, Donald Trump is product placement in and of himself.<\/p>\n<p>What kids especially see on television can profoundly affect their behavior<br \/>\n        later in life. Why, thanks to Andy of Mayberry, our preferred methodology<br \/>\n        for going fishing is to tie a piece of string around an old branch we<br \/>\n        find on the way to the fishing hole. No matter that we haven&#8217;t caught<br \/>\n        a thing in 40 years of trying.<\/p>\n<p>The TV industry has shown that it isn&#8217;t above using its influence to<br \/>\n        affect behavior.&nbsp; Look at smoking.&nbsp; When we were kids, half<br \/>\n        the characters on TV smoked, including the cartoons. Between the programs<br \/>\n        , Joe Camel fought it out with the Marlboro Man for the hearts and lungs<br \/>\n        of America&#8217;s youth. Now smoking on air is <em>verboten<\/em>, and the<br \/>\n        entire habit is being excised from the American character and consciousness.<\/p>\n<p>If TV can agree that smoking is bad, can&#8217;t they come to a consensus<br \/>\n        that reading is good? Show people carrying around books, reading at odd<br \/>\n        moments, discussing stories and ideas they had read? It&#8217;s not as though<br \/>\n        they would need to make it up.&nbsp; People do read.<\/p>\n<p>Of course, they had financial motivation to put the kabash on smoking.<br \/>\n        Medical costs from smoking were threatening to bankrupt the healthcare<br \/>\n        and insurance industries. In this rare case, the interests of a major<br \/>\n        US industry parallel the interests of the majority of the population.<\/p>\n<p>The hospitals and insurance companies wish that everyone would live<br \/>\n        to a ripe old age and then die quietly in their sleep, and we second<br \/>\n        the motion.&nbsp; This would avoid costly long-term care as hearts and<br \/>\n        lungs give out in bodies that otherwise have a lot of miles left on them.<br \/>\n        Their model citizen never sees a doctor, never takes a sick day in his<br \/>\n        entire life, and dies suddenly and painlessly. Hear, hear.<\/p>\n<p>But we would argue that reading is as essential to American success<br \/>\n        and security as smoking is a threat, and that encouraging a cult of reading<br \/>\n        will make Americans better workers, more informed consumers, and more<br \/>\n        capable participants in the democratic process. Of course, that is assuming<br \/>\n        that this is in the interests of the powers that control TV.<\/p>\n<p>Smoking is bad, reading is good.&nbsp; Lets see more of it on TV.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>We were watching an insipid situation comedy the other day while correcting essays, and we saw an actress in a &quot;typical American family&quot; yawn and say to her daughter, &quot;I&#8217;m bored, lets go to the movies.&quot; We couldn&#8217;t remember the &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/2004\/09\/15\/smoking-is-bad-reading-is-good\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":299,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1443],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2577","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-esl-links"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2577","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/299"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2577"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2577\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2577"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2577"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2577"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}