{"id":2456,"date":"2004-07-19T18:02:17","date_gmt":"2004-07-19T22:02:17","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/dbnews\/2004\/07\/19\/shorenstein-comments-via-la\/"},"modified":"2004-07-19T18:02:17","modified_gmt":"2004-07-19T22:02:17","slug":"shorenstein-comments-via-la","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/2004\/07\/19\/shorenstein-comments-via-la\/","title":{"rendered":"Shorenstein Comments Via L.A."},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a name='a3533'><\/a><\/p>\n<table width=\"537\" border=\"0\">\n<tr>\n<td>\n<p><em>A very interesting article appeared recently in the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.latimes.com\/news\/custom\/showcase\/la-oe-jones18jul18.story\">Los<br \/>\n            Angeles Times<\/a>,<br \/>\n        written by Alex Jones, director <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ksg.harvard.edu\/presspol\/\">Harvard&#8217;s<br \/>\n        Shorenstein Center<\/a>,  a sister<br \/>\n        institution to the center of Blogging at Harvard, the <a href=\"http:\/\/cyber.law.harvard.edu\/home\/\">Berkman<br \/>\n        Center<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n<p> The Democrats and the Republicans are inviting a limited number of<br \/>\n        bloggers &#8211; those witty, candid, irreverent, passionate, shrewd and outrageous<br \/>\n        Internet chroniclers &#8211; to their 2004 conventions. It&#8217;s a gesture of respect<br \/>\n        for the growing influence of the blogosphere, and if ever there were<br \/>\n        events ideally suited to bloggers, the heavily scripted and tensionless<br \/>\n      conventions top the list.<\/p>\n<p><em>Starts out in a laudatory tone, a rhetorical feign as old as the<br \/>\n          Greek Athenaeum.<\/em><\/p>\n<p> But make no mistake, this moment of blogging legitimization &#8211; and temporary<br \/>\n      press credentials &#8211; doesn&#8217;t turn bloggers into journalists. <\/p>\n<p><em>Understandable professional protectionism &#8211; not for nothing is this<br \/>\n        guy directing the Sorensen Center for Press, Politics and Public Policy.<br \/>\n        Next, after the obligatory nostalgic rehashing of the Trent Lott debacle,<br \/>\n        a cautionary note enters the story.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Journalists increasingly read blogs to pick up tips. Blogs have become<br \/>\n        a network of capillaries that feed the nation&#8217;s veins of information.<br \/>\n        For that reason, blogging&#8217;s freewheeling, unfettered style makes it a<br \/>\n        juicy target for manipulation.<\/p>\n<p>In these early days, blogging still has the charm of guileless transparency,<br \/>\nwhich in the blogosphere means that everyone &#8211; no matter how cranky or hysterical<br \/>\n&#8211; is presumed to be speaking his or her mind with sincerity. It is this air of<br \/>\nconviction that makes bloggers such potent advocates.<\/p>\n<p>However, if history is any indicator, such earnestness will attract those who<br \/>\nwould exploit it, and they include some canny, inventive people. There is already<br \/>\ntalk of bloggers who would consider publishing items for cash and commercial<br \/>\nblogs that tout products.<\/p>\n<p><em>Hey, cash for stories.&nbsp;You mean actually getting paid for writing?<br \/>\n        But, gosh, wouldn&#8217;t that make us (gulp) &quot;professionals&quot;? And wouldn&#8217;t<br \/>\n        that mean we were part of the problem, not the solution. For the Dowbrigade,<br \/>\n        the solution may come in the form of untraceable cash, or better yet,<br \/>\n        bearer bonds. Delivery instructions to follow.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>from the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.latimes.com\/news\/custom\/showcase\/la-oe-jones18jul18.story\">L.A. Times<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A very interesting article appeared recently in the Los Angeles Times, written by Alex Jones, director Harvard&#8217;s Shorenstein Center, a sister institution to the center of Blogging at Harvard, the Berkman Center. The Democrats and the Republicans are inviting a &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/2004\/07\/19\/shorenstein-comments-via-la\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":299,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1443],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2456","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-esl-links"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2456","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/299"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2456"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2456\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2456"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2456"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2456"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}