{"id":2234,"date":"2004-03-14T22:47:51","date_gmt":"2004-03-15T02:47:51","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/dbnews\/2004\/03\/14\/back-from-the-future\/"},"modified":"2004-03-14T22:47:51","modified_gmt":"2004-03-15T02:47:51","slug":"back-from-the-future","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/2004\/03\/14\/back-from-the-future\/","title":{"rendered":"Back From the Future"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a name='a3005'><\/a><\/p>\n<table width=\"537\" border=\"0\">\n<tr>\n<td width=\"537\">\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/cyber.law.harvard.edu\/blogs\/static\/dowbrigade\/timachine.jpg\" width=\"400\" height=\"335\" align=\"left\">It<br \/>\n        is refreshing that even a jaded, inveterate science fiction fan like<br \/>\n        the Dowbrigade can still come across ideas so simple and profound that<br \/>\n        they make us sit up an think &quot;Why didn&#8217;t WE think of that?&quot;<\/p>\n<p>Such a moment transpired this morning as we were driving to Dim Sum<br \/>\n        with some of the Berkman crew. On a nameless news station they were<br \/>\n        interviewing a physicist from Berkeley University. The subject was time<br \/>\n        travel. Dr.<br \/>\n        Know-it-all was saying that according to our present scientific view<br \/>\n        of the universe, according to the ground rules laid down by Albert Einstein<br \/>\n        100 years ago, time travel is not only possible, but inevitable.<\/p>\n<p>He went on to say that all that is necessary is either VERY high speeds<br \/>\n        (like 99.9% of C) or else VERY high gravitational fields, like in the<br \/>\n        middle of a black hole, and that while these may be beyond our present<br \/>\n        technological limitations there<br \/>\n        is no<br \/>\n        reason not to assume they will eventually be reached. As an example,<br \/>\n        he said if we got into space ship that could go 99% of the speed of light<br \/>\n        and went OUT for a year, turned around and came BACK at the same speed,<br \/>\n        1,000 or 10,000 years would have passed here on earth. This would be<br \/>\n        traveling into the future, although one would hope he could be a bit<br \/>\n        more exact with the dates before booking the trip.<\/p>\n<p>He went on to aver that in his opinion, it was also theoretically possible<br \/>\n        to travel into the past as well. However, it was noted at this point<br \/>\n        that the interviewer noted that were it possible to travel into the<br \/>\n        past, then wouldn&#8217;t the present be<br \/>\n        full<br \/>\n        of thrill seekers from the future back for a look-see?<\/p>\n<p>It was here that the Doctors elegant logic left us in awe. The problem,<br \/>\n        he explained, is that one can only go back as far as the moment when<br \/>\n        the first successful time machine was activated.&nbsp; Look for one in<br \/>\n        your neighborhood soon.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>It is refreshing that even a jaded, inveterate science fiction fan like the Dowbrigade can still come across ideas so simple and profound that they make us sit up an think &quot;Why didn&#8217;t WE think of that?&quot; Such a moment &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/2004\/03\/14\/back-from-the-future\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":299,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1443],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2234","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-esl-links"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2234","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/299"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2234"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2234\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2234"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2234"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2234"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}