{"id":2099,"date":"2004-02-16T13:17:03","date_gmt":"2004-02-16T17:17:03","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/dbnews\/2004\/02\/16\/vanishing-worlds-and-emerging-markets\/"},"modified":"2004-02-16T13:17:03","modified_gmt":"2004-02-16T17:17:03","slug":"vanishing-worlds-and-emerging-markets","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/2004\/02\/16\/vanishing-worlds-and-emerging-markets\/","title":{"rendered":"Vanishing Worlds and Emerging Markets"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a name='a2672'><\/a><\/p>\n<table width=\"537\" border=\"0\">\n<tr>\n<td width=\"537\">\n<p>What a great place to live and work Cambridge is! The<br \/>\n        weather sucks, parking is a nightmare and the primary tool of municipal<br \/>\n        fundraising, and the rents are through the roof. Yet we keep coming back,<br \/>\n        for reasons like the following.<\/p>\n<p>      Last week the Dowbrigade attended <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.law.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/2004\/02\/07#a2571\">a<br \/>\n      couple of amazing Lectures<\/a>, which are<br \/>\n      regular events on the Cambridge cultural calendar, like tractor pulls or<br \/>\n      baked-bean potlucks in other parts of the nation. We have refrained from<br \/>\n      blogging them up to this point as we have been searching for a hook, a<br \/>\n      common thread, a way to integrate them both into an all-encompassing worldview<br \/>\n      which reflects the diversity of intellectual endeavor in the People&#8217;s Republic<br \/>\n      of Cambridge.<\/p>\n<p>      No luck so far, so on this frigid President&#8217;s day we are resolved to go<br \/>\n      ahead anyway, hoping that some uniting principal will emerge as we write.<br \/>\n      If not, our failure may have to be the story itself.<\/p>\n<p>      On Tuesday, we dropped into the JFK Jr. Forum at Harvard&#8217;s Kennedy School<br \/>\n      of Government to see old friend and high school running mate<br \/>\n      <a href=\"http:\/\/www.imf.org\/external\/np\/bio\/eng\/kr.htm\">Ken Rogoff <\/a>talk about his three years as Chief Economist and Director of<br \/>\n      Research for the International Monetary Fund. <\/p>\n<p>      The Dowbrigade has known Ken since we were Middle Schoolers and needed<br \/>\n      our Moms to deliver us to each other&#8217;s houses for &quot;Play Dates&quot; that included<br \/>\n      stamp collecting and model building, but we had not spoken to him since<br \/>\n      he moved to Washington to arbitrate the lives of billions of people in<br \/>\n      the developing world.<\/p>\n<p>      We arrived at the Kennedy School a bit early and staked out a seat in the<br \/>\n      second row. We were disappointed to learn that our Airport card could pick<br \/>\n      up nothing but the overpowering signal of the JFK School wireless service, which<br \/>\n      of course told us in no uncertain terms that we were not authorized to<br \/>\n      access it. <\/p>\n<p>      Silly Dowbrigade! Recently introduced to the world of wireless interconnectivity,<br \/>\n      we had naively assumed that because we were authorized to access the Harvard<br \/>\n      Law School wireless service, our laptop would function all over campus.<br \/>\n      Ha! After 32 years at Harvard we should have assumed that its academic<br \/>\n      Balkanization extended into the wireless world. We suspect that even Harvard<br \/>\n      President Larry Summers lacks super-user privileges which would allow him<br \/>\n      universal access to all nodes Harvardian.<\/p>\n<p>      <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/cyber.law.harvard.edu\/blogs\/static\/dowbrigade\/rogoff2.jpg\" width=\"150\" height=\"224\" align=\"left\">Ken&#8217;s topic was &quot;International Debt Crisis &#8211; the Next Generation&quot; (note<br \/>\n      the geeky Star Trek reference). Promptly at 6 he strode to the podium dressed<br \/>\n      in natty academic uniform; brass-buttoned blazer, grey flannel slacks and<br \/>\n      a valiant vestige of the sixties, a semi-psychedelic neck tie. He was introduced<br \/>\n      by some Kennedy School dean, who remarked on Ken&#8217;s three successive careers;<br \/>\n      as the youngest American chess International Master, a professor at Princeton<br \/>\n      and Harvard, and most recently as the tsar of third-world lending at the IMF.<\/p>\n<p>      There was passing mention of the brouhaha which apparently landed him back<br \/>\n      at Harvard after three tumultuous years at the IMF. About two years ago, when<br \/>\n      the IMF&#8217;s lending policies were viciously attacked by eminent American<br \/>\n      economist  Joseph Stiglitz,<\/p>\n<p>      <a href=\"http:\/\/www.imf.org\/external\/np\/vc\/2002\/070202.htm\">Ken stepped<br \/>\n      up to bat<\/a> to defend the agency. Although most of the economic<br \/>\n      dictums and details which were being bandied about quite frankly flew way<br \/>\n      over the Dowbrigade&#8217;s head, our ear is finely atuned to the minutiae of<br \/>\n      academic discourse, and it was clear in this case that the attacks and<br \/>\n      counter-attacks were becoming increasingly personal. <\/p>\n<p>      This is fortunately rare in the world of academia, but appearantly less so in the upper<br \/>\n      reaches of economic policymaking and evolving globalization, and so we<br \/>\n      were less than completely surprised to learn that Ken was returning to<br \/>\n      Harvard. This evening, he started his presentation by introducing his conclusion &#8211; that<br \/>\n      the revolving debt crises of the 80&#8217;s and 90&#8217;s &#8211; Mexico, Brazil, Argentina,<br \/>\n      Thailand, Turkey, Russia, etc. &#8211; have in no way been resolved, and that<br \/>\n      the current cascade of investment capital into developing markets completely<br \/>\n      ignores the certainty that another round of defaults is just around the<br \/>\n      corner.<\/p>\n<p>      As he developed his thesis it was clear that he had identified as one of the primary<br \/>\n      risk factors for international economic stabilization at this time &#8211; the monstrous<br \/>\n      budget and trade deficits being run up by the Bush administration. It is<br \/>\n      increasingly likely, he said, that the eventual outcome of the US stimulating<br \/>\n      its economy by spending more than it collects and financing the rest will<br \/>\n      be another global recession. He noted however (and here he smiled a thin,<br \/>\n      bloodless smile), &quot;A recession is to an economist what a plague is to an<br \/>\n      undertaker.&quot;<\/p>\n<p>      As Ken asks in his article  <a href=\"http:\/\/www.msnbc.msn.com\/id\/4209189\/\">&quot;This<br \/>\n      Time its Not Different<\/a>&quot; in this week&#8217;s Newsweek International,<br \/>\n      &quot;Has everybody forgotten about Mexico (1994); Thailand, South Korea, Indonesia<br \/>\n      and others<br \/>\n      (1997); Russia (1998); Brazil (1999); Argentina (2001); Turkey (2001),<br \/>\n      and Brazil (2002)? They shouldn&#8217;t&quot;.<\/p>\n<p>      His point is that because interest rates are so low in the developed world,<br \/>\n      international investors are once again pouring capital into developing<br \/>\n      markets ill-equipped to maintain the discipline and sound economic management<br \/>\n      necessary to guarantee a continued return on investment. As an example he mentioned Brazil,<br \/>\n      which in August 2002, less than two years ago,<br \/>\n      was on the border of default and only escaped thanks to a $45 billion loan<br \/>\n      from the IMF. At the time, they had to pay a whopping 24% above US treasuries<br \/>\n      prime rate to find financing on the international market. Today Brazil is<br \/>\n      paying only 4% above prime, not that much more than the spread many individuals<br \/>\n      pay on their mortgages. As Ken notes, it is a lot easier for the local<br \/>\n      bank to seize your house or car than it is for Citibank to get to a deadbeat<br \/>\n      sovereign debtor.<\/p>\n<p>      His main point was that the post-1994 period of revolving third world debt<br \/>\n      defaults was not an aberration. Argentina has defaulted five times since<br \/>\n      its birth in the 1820s, Brazil seven times, Mexico eight times, Turkey<br \/>\n      seven, Venezuela nine, etc. While it is impossible to predict exactly where<br \/>\n      the next collapse is coming, it is inevitable, and the investors pouring new<br \/>\n      money into these endangered economies are either in denial or playing a<br \/>\n      dangerous game of musical chairs with their money.<\/p>\n<p>      &quot;Investors ought to realize that last year&#8217;s 55 percent average return<br \/>\n      on emerging-market debt was an aberration. Developing-country leaders need<br \/>\n      to realize that borrowing is like taking steroids: it gives countries a<br \/>\n      short-term performance boost but leads to insidious long-term problems.&quot;<\/p>\n<p>        Ken&#8217;s solutions? Basically, more discipline. Discipline on the part<br \/>\n            of developing countries to avoid debt financing that solves their<br \/>\n            immediate problems<br \/>\n        but creates unsupportable debt loads. Discipline on the part of international<br \/>\n        lenders to realize that these economies still represent considerable<br \/>\n            risk and raise interest rates accordingly. Discipline on the part of the US government in controling their own deficit spending. And discipline in the<br \/>\n            international<br \/>\n        lending community to make it more difficult for foreign creditors to<br \/>\n            enforce claims in rich-country courts and make it harder for developing<br \/>\n            countries<br \/>\n        to borrow.<\/p>\n<p>        Perhaps his most surprising pronouncement to the Dowbrigade personally<br \/>\n        was that any and all of the developing countries in debt crisis could<br \/>\n        pay their debt, if they only had the political will to do so. He made is sound so simple.<\/p>\n<p>        He called the present free-lending atmosphere a recipe for disaster,<br \/>\n        and ended on this sobering note, &quot;Debt crises are as old as international<br \/>\n        lending,<br \/>\n        and call me crazy, but I don&#8217;t think we are going to have to wait too<br \/>\n        long for the next one.&quot;<\/p>\n<p>        After that eye-opening glimpse into the high-flying world of international<br \/>\n        finance we didn&#8217;t feel much like sticking around to wool-gather about<br \/>\n        high school escapades, so after a brief exchange of business cards and<br \/>\n        a loose<br \/>\n        plan to get together soon to play tennis, we left.<\/p>\n<p>        The very next night we ventured into a very different world-view, just a<br \/>\n        few blocks away, at the First Parrish Church on Church Street in Harvard<br \/>\n        Sq.<br \/>\n        to hear old classmate <a href=\"http:\/\/wadedavis.com\">Wade Davis<\/a> speak about &quot;Vanishing Cultures &#8211; Mankind&#8217;s<br \/>\n        Dwindling Heritage&quot;.<\/p>\n<p>        <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/cyber.law.harvard.edu\/blogs\/static\/dowbrigade\/wadedavis.jpg\" width=\"220\" height=\"168\" align=\"left\">Wade and the Dowbrigade were at the core of Harvard&#8217;s program in Cultural<br \/>\n        Anthropology back in the 1970&#8217;s. Both of us were interested in Ethnobotany,<br \/>\n        which is basically the academic study of getting high on weird plants.<br \/>\n        Although the Dowbrigade got sidetracked on a research expedition to the<br \/>\n        Peruvian Amazon and ended up teaching English in the Peruvian National<br \/>\n        University for 10 years, Wade went on to become the premier ethnobotanist<br \/>\n        of our generation and how has one of the All-time Greatest Job Titles<br \/>\n        in the history of jobs. He is, according to his resume and business card,<br \/>\n        the Explorer-in-Residence at the National Geographic!<\/p>\n<p>        What a job! He gets to gallivant around the globe, saving endangered<br \/>\n        species of humans and animals, writing about and photographing the weird things<br \/>\n        he sees and hears. Over the years Wade has developed a dynamic and hypnotic<br \/>\n        speaking style, which is somewhat surprising considering that back in<br \/>\n        college we attributed<br \/>\n        his quiet demeanor to near-constant intoxication by stupefying substances.<br \/>\n        His lecture was pure poetry, as he painted word pictures in the air with<br \/>\n        a cadence<br \/>\n        and clarity which bespoke practice and conviction.<\/p>\n<p>        He began with a brief but panoramic tour of some of the diverse cultures<br \/>\n        he has visited, trying to give the audience an idea of the incredible<br \/>\n        variety of flavors of the human experience that exist on the planet today.<br \/>\n        He was<br \/>\n        attempting a task so daunting as to be almost impossible; to express<br \/>\n        in words what it is like to live in a different world, to experience<br \/>\n        life<br \/>\n        from a different perspective, and to move back and forth between alternate<br \/>\n        realities like some people switch from the Red Line to the Green.<\/p>\n<p>        Obviously impossible to do in words, but we got the impression that the<br \/>\n        majority of the packed house of perhaps 200 had enough first-hand experience<br \/>\n        with other cultural worldviews to appreciate the truth of which he spoke.<br \/>\n        After impressing us with the wonder of human variety and his encyclopedic<br \/>\n        knowledge of some of the nooks and crannies of life on earth, he started<br \/>\n        dropping bombshells on our sense of wonder.<\/p>\n<p>        Deforestation and development is destroying the habitats not only of<br \/>\n        thousand of animal and plant species, but of a significant percentage<br \/>\n        of existing<br \/>\n        human cultures in the world. Within our lifetimes, over half of all human<br \/>\n        cultures and languages will disappear. Every two weeks an elder dies<br \/>\n        somewhere on the planet who represents the last speaker of a unique human<br \/>\n        language.<br \/>\n        It takes thousands of years for a language to evolve. These languages<br \/>\n        will never be heard again.<\/p>\n<p>        Like Wade Davis, the Dowbrigade believe that humanities inheritance is<br \/>\n        irreversibly impoverished every time the variety of human experience<br \/>\n        is reduced in this way. To us, the human experience on this planet is<br \/>\n        like<br \/>\n        an intense and beautiful tapestry composed of thousands of distinct and<br \/>\n        stellar threads of culture and language, and when those threads are cut<br \/>\n        or left to dangle the coherence and completeness of the tapestry can<br \/>\n        be seen to fray and weaken. If there is a way for the human race out<br \/>\n        of this<br \/>\n        mess we have created, each time the diversity of the human experience<br \/>\n        is reduced by cultural extinction, the solution becomes that much more<br \/>\n        difficult<br \/>\n        to imagine. If present trends continue, we will eventually find ourselves<br \/>\n        trapped in a monoculture with no way back.<\/p>\n<p>        Wade ended with a story which reinforced the concept of technological<br \/>\n        relativity and gave pause to the Dowbrigade, who like so many today looks<br \/>\n        to technology<br \/>\n        as a source of solutions and a fountain of hope. Back in the 70&#8217;s, when<br \/>\n        we were students of Cultural Anthropology, the concept of &quot;Appropriate<br \/>\n        Technology&quot; was in vogue. Wade&#8217;s story went like this.<\/p>\n<p>        In Canada, where Wade is from, there were until relatively recently,<br \/>\n        groups of Aleuts in the northern territories who lived lives to a large<br \/>\n        extent<br \/>\n        identical to their ancestors. They hunted and fished, built their shelters<br \/>\n        from ice, and not only survived but thrived in one of the most hostile<br \/>\n        environments on the planet. In the early 1950&#8217;s, not coincidentally in<br \/>\n        conjunction to open up the vast Canadian oil and gas fields, the government<br \/>\n        embarked<br \/>\n        on a program to collect the native Aleuts and gather them into fixed<br \/>\n        villages where they could benefit from health, education and economic<br \/>\n        infrastructure<br \/>\n        &#8211; basically all the benefits of modern society.<\/p>\n<p>        Most of the Indians were more than willing to accept the offer of free<br \/>\n        housing, healthcare and education, but some of the old-timers resisted,<br \/>\n        preferring to preserve the ancient ways. One old man in particular loved<br \/>\n        his rough life on the ice and tundra, the companionship of his sled dogs,<br \/>\n        and the divine illumination he found in the artic emptiness and nowhere<br \/>\n        else.<\/p>\n<p>        His family was determined to move him to the new village along with them,<br \/>\n        and were convinced he had acquiesced as his protests diminished with<br \/>\n        time as the relocation date moved closer. In order to keep him from striking<br \/>\n        out on his own, they confiscated all of his tools and resources; his<br \/>\n        knife,<br \/>\n        sled, boots, snowshoes, etc., leaving him with just the furs on his back.<br \/>\n        But one night just a few days before the final departure, under cover<br \/>\n        of darkness and into a gathering blizzard, the old man slipped from the<br \/>\n        final<br \/>\n        family igloo.<\/p>\n<p>        Behind a protective wall of ice he squatted and took a sizable shit.<br \/>\n        Carefully, he reached down and retrieved it, and as the Arctic cold solidified<br \/>\n        it he carefully molded it into a shit-knife. After the basic form was<br \/>\n        set, he used his saliva to create a hard, sharp edge.<\/p>\n<p>        The old man then went to his beloved sled dogs. He called to his favorite,<br \/>\n        and while murmuring reassuring endearments to the animal, slit its throat<br \/>\n        and gutted it on the spot.<\/p>\n<p>        Quickly, he skinned the dead animal with his shit-knife and wrapped his<br \/>\n        freezing feet in the warm dog skin. Then he constructed a crude but functional<br \/>\n        one man sled from the dog? ribs, and cords and straps form its ligaments.<br \/>\n        Calling over another dog, he strapped up his home-made sled and disappeared<br \/>\n        into the raging storm.<\/p>\n<p>        Apocryphal or not, it really makes one think, no? For those of us for<br \/>\n        whom &quot;roughing it&quot; means getting by without broadband on vacation, the<br \/>\n        knowledge,<br \/>\n        ingenuity and determination of that old Eskimo are things we will never<br \/>\n        be privileged to experience. To the Dowbrigade the lesson to be learned<br \/>\n        is that the crucial factor in the value of our experience is not in what<br \/>\n        technology is available to us, but rather how we use it, and to what<br \/>\n        ends.<\/p>\n<p>        And so, in the end, our own ideological conundrum came down to this;<br \/>\n        Can we envision a world in which the personal visions of Ken and Wade<br \/>\n        can constructively<br \/>\n        coexist? Q world where macro-economic growth can continue in a fashion<br \/>\n        equitable to both investors and investees, while protecting and preserving<br \/>\n        the human cultural inheritance we received from our ancestors and are<br \/>\n        charged with leaving for our descendents.<\/p>\n<p>        We are unable to answer in the affirmative. For a while now our main<br \/>\n        doubts about the transcendental potential of capitalism has lain in the<br \/>\n        cyclical<br \/>\n        nature of its spasmodic starts and stops. While these mathematically<br \/>\n        delineable variations are grist for the publications of economists and<br \/>\n        , they take<br \/>\n        a devastating human toll of on both the microeconomic (workers struggling<br \/>\n        to stay afloat without a paycheck) and macroeconomic (nations in periodic<br \/>\n        bankruptcy stifling the aspirations of millions) levels.<\/p>\n<p>        Wade talked about how one of the demographic results of globalization<br \/>\n        has been massive internal migrations to the major cities in impoverished<br \/>\n        third-world<br \/>\n        countries. This makes it easier for those people to participate in the<br \/>\n        global economy, to access modern education, medicine and manufacturing<br \/>\n        jobs (if they exist), but at a tremendous cost. Declining agricultural<br \/>\n        production, abandoned hinterland and, most tragically, truncated cultural<br \/>\n        traditions and forgotten repositories of human knowledge.<\/p>\n<p>        For someone who prides himself on his ability to simultaneously hold<br \/>\n        contradictory ideas in his mind, this inability to integrate Wade&#8217;s and<br \/>\n        Ken&#8217;s worldviews<br \/>\n        is deeply disturbing. Lacking a way to encapsulate them in an integrated<br \/>\n        whole, sanity demands that we choose one or the other. Stay tuned&#8230;&#8230;<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp; <\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>What a great place to live and work Cambridge is! The weather sucks, parking is a nightmare and the primary tool of municipal fundraising, and the rents are through the roof. Yet we keep coming back, for reasons like the &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/2004\/02\/16\/vanishing-worlds-and-emerging-markets\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":299,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1443],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2099","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-esl-links"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2099","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/299"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2099"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2099\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2099"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2099"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.blogs.harvard.edu\/dowbrigade\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2099"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}