The royal family, and especially Not only that. As The Evening Standard, among other newspapers, noted In the 1930’s, moreover, some members were widely seen as openly sympathetic from the New Hey, just because his family comes from Germany and was chummy with Argument 8,758 against hereditary monarchs… The royal family, and especially Prince Philip, the queen’s husband, has committed an array of gaffes. Prince Philip reinforced his reputation for ill-chosen utterances in 1997 when he addressed Chancellor Helmut Kohl of Germany as … Continue reading ![](\"http:\/\/cyber.law.harvard.edu\/blogs\/static\/dowbrigade\/princharaz.jpg\")
Argument
\n 8,758 against hereditary monarchs…<\/em><\/p>\n
\n Prince Philip, the queen’s husband, has
\n committed an array of gaffes. Prince Philip reinforced his reputation
\n for ill-chosen utterances in 1997 when he addressed Chancellor Helmut
\n Kohl of Germany as Reichskanzler – the title used by Hitler.<\/p>\n
\n on Thursday, the royal family had an ambiguous relationship with Germany
\n and
\n the Nazis. The House of Windsor was formed in 1917 when the royal family
\n changed its name from Saxe-Coburg Gotha, a name it acquired with the
\n marriage in 1840 of Queen Victoria and Albert of Saxe-Coburg, which
\n was then a duchy
\n in central Germany.<\/p>\n
\n to the Nazis. In one iconic photograph, the Duke and Duchess of Windsor,
\n smiling broadly, were seen greeting Hitler.<\/p>\n
\n York Times<\/a><\/p>\n
\n Der Fuehrer, and he likes dressing up in Nazi regalia, that doesn’t make
\n him
\n a Neo-Nazi, or a Nazi sympathizer or anything. Even the Jewish grandson of
\n a haberdasher who lost family in the Holocaust can admit they had the snappiest
\n uniforms since the Roman Legion.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"